Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Attacked US Forces In September
Captain's Quarters ^ | March 23, 2007 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 03/23/2007 8:30:31 PM PDT by jdm

While the world wonders about the attack on and abduction of 15 British sailors by Iranian forces earlier this month, US News & World Report published the details of an attack by Iranian forces on Iraqi and American troops last September:

As the British government demanded the immediate release of 15 of its sailors whose boats were seized by Iranian naval vessels in the Persian Gulf on Friday, U.S. News has learned that this is not the first showdown that coalition forces have had with the Iranian military.

According to a U.S. Army report out of Iraq obtained by U.S. News, American troops, acting as advisers for Iraqi border guards, were recently surrounded and attacked by a larger unit of Iranian soldiers, well within the border of Iraq.

The report highlights the details: A platoon of Iranian soldiers on the Iraqi side of the border fired rocket-propelled grenades and used small arms against a joint patrol of U.S. and Iraqi soldiers east of Balad Ruz. Four Iraqi Army soldiers, one interpreter, and one Iraqi border policeman remain unaccounted for after the September incident in eastern Diyala, 75 miles east of Baghdad.

The Coalition forces saw three Iranian soldiers in Iraqi territory. As they approached, two of them ran back across the border, but one remained in Iraq. The joint force started interrogating the Iranian, and that's when the attack commenced. A stronger contingent of Iranians materialized and threatened to attack the US/Iraqi patrol if they tried to leave. While the Iranian captain told them this, his forces started firing on the patrol with small arms and RPGs.

The Iraqis and Americans returned fire at that point, and they took no casualties. However, the forces were unable to account for a half-dozen Iraqis after the incident. The report does not say whether the missing men were ever found or released by the Iranians, assuming they were captured.

This isn't the first time Iran has captured British sailors, either. In June 2004, they seized three British patrol boats and detained eight sailors. Teheran released them shortly afterwards, but analysts believed that they wanted to shift attention from the recently-released IAEA report that accused them of dishonesty in violating the non-proliferation agreement. They also may have wanted to push oil prices higher in order to make Bush's re-election more difficult.

Iran should take care. The British still have diplomatic relations, and so far have acted as a brake on American action against the mullahcracy. London may decide that the Iranians aren't worth the effort.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: brits; iran; sailors; usnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: HardStarboard
There's little love lost between the Iranians and the Brits. Do you remember the Iranian Embassy Hostage murders?

L

41 posted on 03/23/2007 10:29:35 PM PDT by Lurker (Calling islam a religion is like calling a car a submarine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Maybe they have the nuke, or a few of them.


42 posted on 03/23/2007 10:33:56 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack
It makes no sense that Iran is being so provocative prior to having a nuke, much less while Bush/Blair have less than 2 years remaining in Office.

Very odd.

Makes you wonder what their trump card is.

a. a nuke

b. assurances of support from China or Russia

c. Economic power of oil

d. Religious stupidity

e. Back channel meetings with Ted Kennedy or maybe Soros

43 posted on 03/23/2007 10:40:40 PM PDT by oldbrowser (First, Do No Harm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tabor; faq
I had not picked up on that aspect nearly as well as you guys, but I think there is something of weight to your observations.

I don't think people give Bush nearly enough credit on many levels in this most dangerous of games we find ourselves in.

I think as his presidency gets further and further distant in the rear view mirror of history, he is going to come down as a very significant leader of out nation.
44 posted on 03/23/2007 10:53:56 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Southack

"Clearly the smart play..."

I don't think "smart" factors into their actions in this instance at all. They have plenty in common with their western leftist enablers:

They are both driven by an illogical, irrational pseudo-passion, believe chaos precedes "revolution", and therefore must need be. Amadnutjob is begging for the return of the mahdi, but knows he will not unless chaos is widespread and the rule. The leftists revel in chaos and injustice with glee and are therefore suitable partners and allies.


45 posted on 03/23/2007 11:11:09 PM PDT by DEEP_e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam; ElCid89
I got this out of a marketwatch article

A British Navy boarding party had completed an inspection of a merchant ship when Iranian vessels surrounded the British forces, and then escorted them into Iranian territorial waters, the U.K. Ministry of Defense said.
46 posted on 03/23/2007 11:19:59 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

If I am not mistaken, the U.S. does not get any of their oil from Iran.


47 posted on 03/23/2007 11:47:17 PM PDT by Patriot Hooligan ("God have mercy on my enemies because I won't." General George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jdm

The Brits are now justified to declare war on Iran and take out their nukes.


48 posted on 03/24/2007 12:02:09 AM PDT by A6M3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Who says they are baiting the UK? W ho says the UK wasn't pushing things? Seems to me that Blair/Bush would be wise to push the envelope, making the Iranians have to decide how far to give before reacting. In fact, it seems irresponsible if we *aren't* trying to provoke a response!


49 posted on 03/24/2007 12:45:25 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montanus

As to the French carrier, I'll quote Patton:

"I'd rather have two German Divisions ahead of me, than three French ones behind me."


50 posted on 03/24/2007 1:04:34 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Ignorance should be painful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I see it differently, a crisis/invasion needs to happen before the Mahdi appears to lead the shia to victory against the kaffir aggressors.
51 posted on 03/24/2007 1:10:28 AM PDT by Pro-Bush (hater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Patriot Hooligan
If I am not mistaken, the U.S. does not get any of their oil from Iran.

Doesn't matter....oil is a fungible commodity.

52 posted on 03/24/2007 1:25:59 AM PDT by fruitintheroom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Southack
It's strikingly odd that Iran is baiting the UK/U.S. to attack while wartime leaders Blair and Bush are still in Office.

And the fact that Iran is surrounded by U.S. forces on pretty much all of its flanks...

Ahmadinejad is certifiable.

53 posted on 03/24/2007 2:55:01 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Quiet Down Out There!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Personally I think the reason Ahmadenijad is baiting (and he is baiting) the US/UK is to do what you said ....provoke an attack. Why would he want to do that? Well, the Iranian youth have been becoming more and more pro-west, and this is something that has worried both the religious and conservative sections of Iran. Now, how do you get the youth back? Simple: Provoke an attack by an external power (perferably America and Israel, but apparently the UK will do just as fine). War is never sterile, and thus while we may target the people responsible it is inevitable that we will also hit non-targets (or the Iranian forces can 'help us' out by bombing a school or apartment block and claiming it was American ordinance that did that).

Result: A repeat of the 79 revolution. The Iranian youth is delivered to the Clerics and Conservatives on a silver platter. For another generation Iran is firmly in the control of the various clerics and political demagogues running that country.

The sad thing is that the way things are going we may really have no option but to hit Iran. That will play into the hands of Mad Ahmad, but we really may have no other choice. Those guys are pushing things too far.

Anyways, that is what I think Mad Ahmad is trying to do. Goad the West into attacking, and by doing so crystallize his grip on the future of Iran(well, not really his, but that of the true powers in Iran).

To do so he has to ensure that we (or a major Western power ....by the way, even France would do ....) attack them. And the way he is doing things he may just get his wish.

54 posted on 03/24/2007 4:07:12 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Now, how do you get the youth back?

Or, how do you get rid of a lot of them? From what I've read about the Iran/Iraq war, these people have no qualms about sending thousands of their own teenagers to certain deaths. And, I think you present an astute perception here.

55 posted on 03/24/2007 4:21:16 AM PDT by fruitintheroom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: everydayislikesunday

If only we would. But, we won't.


56 posted on 03/24/2007 4:27:37 AM PDT by MrLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tabor
The big question is: why? I mull things around in my head and imagine there are several possibilities. Having said that, we must deal with them strongly, but very intelligently.

The answer is: Amadinnerjacket believes he can bring forth the Mahdi. As a matter of fact, I'm not too sure he doesn't have someone all set to pose as the Mahdi so he can rally all the Shiia people to his cause. That's why we have to be very sure of what we are doing when we retaliate. We have to go in with surgical precision so the people see they are not being attacked.

57 posted on 03/24/2007 5:01:13 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("Hard is not Hopeless" General Petraeus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: navyguy
If this report is correct then its proof that our government will not respond to Iran under ANY circumstances

So you can't understand it, is that correct? Our congress is threatening to cut funds for the war we're already in and YOU want Bush to start another one? If you were so tough, then why didn't you make sure the democrats didn't get in power so they could attempt to publically castrate Bush and our military?

58 posted on 03/24/2007 5:06:51 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("Hard is not Hopeless" General Petraeus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Southack

They do a lot of what to us seem odd, but to them may seem appropiate.


59 posted on 03/24/2007 5:42:29 AM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack

"very odd"

It makes perfect sense if, in his state of delusion, i'manutjob thinks an attack on iran would unite muslims and the arab world againstthe infidels.


60 posted on 03/24/2007 6:07:41 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson