Posted on 03/23/2007 8:30:31 PM PDT by jdm
While the world wonders about the attack on and abduction of 15 British sailors by Iranian forces earlier this month, US News & World Report published the details of an attack by Iranian forces on Iraqi and American troops last September:
As the British government demanded the immediate release of 15 of its sailors whose boats were seized by Iranian naval vessels in the Persian Gulf on Friday, U.S. News has learned that this is not the first showdown that coalition forces have had with the Iranian military.
According to a U.S. Army report out of Iraq obtained by U.S. News, American troops, acting as advisers for Iraqi border guards, were recently surrounded and attacked by a larger unit of Iranian soldiers, well within the border of Iraq.
The report highlights the details: A platoon of Iranian soldiers on the Iraqi side of the border fired rocket-propelled grenades and used small arms against a joint patrol of U.S. and Iraqi soldiers east of Balad Ruz. Four Iraqi Army soldiers, one interpreter, and one Iraqi border policeman remain unaccounted for after the September incident in eastern Diyala, 75 miles east of Baghdad.
The Coalition forces saw three Iranian soldiers in Iraqi territory. As they approached, two of them ran back across the border, but one remained in Iraq. The joint force started interrogating the Iranian, and that's when the attack commenced. A stronger contingent of Iranians materialized and threatened to attack the US/Iraqi patrol if they tried to leave. While the Iranian captain told them this, his forces started firing on the patrol with small arms and RPGs.
The Iraqis and Americans returned fire at that point, and they took no casualties. However, the forces were unable to account for a half-dozen Iraqis after the incident. The report does not say whether the missing men were ever found or released by the Iranians, assuming they were captured.
This isn't the first time Iran has captured British sailors, either. In June 2004, they seized three British patrol boats and detained eight sailors. Teheran released them shortly afterwards, but analysts believed that they wanted to shift attention from the recently-released IAEA report that accused them of dishonesty in violating the non-proliferation agreement. They also may have wanted to push oil prices higher in order to make Bush's re-election more difficult.
Iran should take care. The British still have diplomatic relations, and so far have acted as a brake on American action against the mullahcracy. London may decide that the Iranians aren't worth the effort.
L
Maybe they have the nuke, or a few of them.
Very odd.
Makes you wonder what their trump card is.
a. a nuke
b. assurances of support from China or Russia
c. Economic power of oil
d. Religious stupidity
e. Back channel meetings with Ted Kennedy or maybe Soros
"Clearly the smart play..."
I don't think "smart" factors into their actions in this instance at all. They have plenty in common with their western leftist enablers:
They are both driven by an illogical, irrational pseudo-passion, believe chaos precedes "revolution", and therefore must need be. Amadnutjob is begging for the return of the mahdi, but knows he will not unless chaos is widespread and the rule. The leftists revel in chaos and injustice with glee and are therefore suitable partners and allies.
If I am not mistaken, the U.S. does not get any of their oil from Iran.
The Brits are now justified to declare war on Iran and take out their nukes.
Who says they are baiting the UK? W ho says the UK wasn't pushing things? Seems to me that Blair/Bush would be wise to push the envelope, making the Iranians have to decide how far to give before reacting. In fact, it seems irresponsible if we *aren't* trying to provoke a response!
As to the French carrier, I'll quote Patton:
"I'd rather have two German Divisions ahead of me, than three French ones behind me."
Doesn't matter....oil is a fungible commodity.
And the fact that Iran is surrounded by U.S. forces on pretty much all of its flanks...
Ahmadinejad is certifiable.
Result: A repeat of the 79 revolution. The Iranian youth is delivered to the Clerics and Conservatives on a silver platter. For another generation Iran is firmly in the control of the various clerics and political demagogues running that country.
The sad thing is that the way things are going we may really have no option but to hit Iran. That will play into the hands of Mad Ahmad, but we really may have no other choice. Those guys are pushing things too far.
Anyways, that is what I think Mad Ahmad is trying to do. Goad the West into attacking, and by doing so crystallize his grip on the future of Iran(well, not really his, but that of the true powers in Iran).
To do so he has to ensure that we (or a major Western power ....by the way, even France would do ....) attack them. And the way he is doing things he may just get his wish.
Or, how do you get rid of a lot of them? From what I've read about the Iran/Iraq war, these people have no qualms about sending thousands of their own teenagers to certain deaths. And, I think you present an astute perception here.
If only we would. But, we won't.
The answer is: Amadinnerjacket believes he can bring forth the Mahdi. As a matter of fact, I'm not too sure he doesn't have someone all set to pose as the Mahdi so he can rally all the Shiia people to his cause. That's why we have to be very sure of what we are doing when we retaliate. We have to go in with surgical precision so the people see they are not being attacked.
So you can't understand it, is that correct? Our congress is threatening to cut funds for the war we're already in and YOU want Bush to start another one? If you were so tough, then why didn't you make sure the democrats didn't get in power so they could attempt to publically castrate Bush and our military?
They do a lot of what to us seem odd, but to them may seem appropiate.
"very odd"
It makes perfect sense if, in his state of delusion, i'manutjob thinks an attack on iran would unite muslims and the arab world againstthe infidels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.