IF YOU WOULD LIKE ON OR OFF THIS HIGH VOLUME RUDY PING LIST PLEASE LET ME, PHIKAPMOM OR BUNNYSLIPPERS KNOW!
Another false poll. The non-announced Gingrich is included, but the non-announced Fred Thompson is omitted. What's up with that? Can you say slanted???
Just the annointed three, thank you, that's all.
It seems like the only significant poll movement is going on in the Dem race.
But Rudy better watch out: immigration will bite him just as hard.
Still, good to see someone is beating Hillobama regularly. Now, if Fred Thompson will get in the race, I'd like to see how he stacks up.
Thanks for posting the poll.
However, upon investigation, Newt has 13% in the article, not 10%
Please make the correction!
Thanks!
The fact that Giuliani is the only candidate in either party who more people would definitely vote for than against is very significant. HUGE!
Rudy doesn't seem to be budging much past 33-35 percent on anybody's poll...and it's been that way for awhile.
So who are these 15% still voting for McCain in these polls and can't we void their voter registration cards for just being too stupid or apathetic?
Incredible - reading through this tired thread.
The same voices - the same tired opinions - I feel like I am reading the voices inside some grade school class.
Romney, Rudy, Newt - Duncan, Fred, - - - etc. etc.
All fine men - each will have to confront attacks, all will have to define themselves, and defend themselves.
The 08' election will come down to party unity and the issues defined inside national security. Social issues will NOT carry the 08' election - they will only restrict the debates on the real issues.
Whomever we nominate we must all agree to work for - and support.
Honestly - most of you - I can close my eyes are recite your diatribes line by line.
It gets old.
ummmm....what's the point of adding in people who aren't even running, unless you wanna play "statistical lie" with the People?
Why not add in Dick Cheney? Condi Rice? Rush Limbaugh? They're not running either...
Why does the title have Newt at 10% when the article says 13?
Those who identify themselves as Somewhat Conservative prefer Giuliani over McCain by a 37% to 17% margin. Among political moderates in the GOP, 42% say they would vote for Giuliani, 20% for McCain, and 6% for Romney"
Rudy's Right Record
Giulianis pre-9/11 performance should ease conservatives doubts.
By Deroy Murdock, National Review
The same Beltway experts who anointed Senator John McCain (R., Ariz.) the GOP frontrunner, even as he under-polled fellow presidential contender Rudolph W. Giuliani, now parrot equally dodgy talking points: When Republicans meet the real Rudy, they will abandon New Yorks former mayor like cattle fleeing a burning barn. Then, the wobbly Washington wisdom continues, Giulianis three marriages, and his less-than-solidly right-wing views on gays, guns, and gametes will torpedo his buoyant presidential hopes.
These seers now detect unhappiness with the GOP aspirants. They cite a recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll in which 26 percent of Republican primary voters were dissatisfied with Giuliani, McCain, and former Massachusetts governor Willard Mitt Romney, among others. However, 56 percent called these choices satisfactory. This lines up with the 57 percent of conservative Republicans who preferred Giuliani, versus 31 percent for McCain. More broadly, Republicans backed Giuliani 38 percent to McCains 24, former House speaker Newt Gingrichs 10, Romneys 8, and 2 percent each for Kansas Senator Sam Brownback and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee.
But what if voters like Giuliani better once they understand his pre-9/11 performance? Educating Republicans on his complete mayoral record and soon may be Giulianis best bet for extinguishing lingering grumbling about his candidacy.
I recently visited Baltimore, Charlotte, Richmond, Salem, Oregon; Seattle, and Johnstown, Pennsylvania, mainly to deliver speeches sponsored by Young Americas Foundation. I conversed with conservative activists, College Republican leaders, university professors, and think-tank scholars, among others.
These Americans vividly remember Giuliani emerging from the ashes of September 11, like a latter-day Churchill rising from the rubble of the London Blitz. However, these involved and informed citizens knew startlingly little about Giulianis other mayoral achievements:
Through robust policing, Giuliani drove overall crime down 56.1 percent, while chopping homicides 66.6 percent, from 1,946 in 1993 to 649 in 2001.
Abortions on Giulianis watch dropped 16.9 percent, according to figures from the New York State Office of Vital Statistics. It reports 103,997 legal abortions in New York City in 1993 and 86,466 in 2001. Abortions fell more quickly under the pro-choice Giuliani than they did nationwide. The pro-choice Guttmacher Institute tracked 1,495,000 abortions across the U.S. in 1993 versus 1,303,000 in 2001. This 12.8 percent national decrease lagged the swifter fall-off in local abortions during Giulianis tenure. Meanwhile, taxpayer-funded Medicaid abortions plunged 22.9 percent under Giuliani. Giulianis pro-choice rhetoric seemed to accompany an official hands-off policy that otherwise did not promote abortion.
Gothams foster-care population fell 38 percent as Giuliani helped loving families adopt 17,804 boys and girls.
By fighting fraud and finding work for legitimate beneficiaries, Giuliani cut welfare rolls 58 percent, starting two years before federal welfare reform. Giuliani renamed welfare offices Job Centers.
Giuliani privatized 23,625 previously confiscated, city-owned dwellings, 78 percent of supply, benefiting family and individual homeowners and tenants.
Pursuant to his One Standard. One City campaign slogan, Giuliani dumped Gothams 20 percent set-aside and 10-percent overbid bonus for minority and female contractors. The whole idea of quotas to me perpetuates discrimination, he explained. He initiated this on his 24th day in office, far exceeding any colorblindness legislation Congress even debated during the 12-year Republican Revolution.
Similarly, Giuliani shuttered the David Dinkins-era Offices of African-American/Caribbean Affairs, Asian Affairs, European-American Affairs, Gay Community Affairs, Immigrant Affairs, Jewish Community Affairs, and Latino Affairs.
Giulianis $10 million Charter School Improvement Fund helped 3,286 pupils in 17 new charter schools, up from $0, zero students, and zero campuses in 1997. He ended tenure for school principals, so slackers could be sacked. He also stopped social promotion; students needed to complete grade-level work to matriculate.
Giuliani ended open admissions at the City University of New York. Mean SAT scores for incoming freshmen rose from 863 in 1993 to 1049 in 2001, a 21.6 percent improvement. Stricter entrance requirements did not impede minorities, as critics ominously predicted. First-time freshmen enrollment at CUNYs seven senior colleges grew from 7,104 in fall 1999 to 9,576 in fall 2006, up 34.8 percent. Black-student arrivals simultaneously increased from 1,655 to 1,765 (up 6.65 percent). Hispanic freshmen jumped 37.1 percent, from 1,771 to 2,428. Meanwhile, blacks earned 5.15 percent more bachelor degrees, from 3,843 in 1999-2000 to 4,041 in 2005-2006. For Hispanics, the equivalent figures were 2,456 and 3,032 a 23.45 percent advancement.
In September 1999, Giuliani loudly wondered why taxpayers helped finance a Brooklyn Museum exhibition that featured a painting of the Virgin Mary decorated with a dried chunk of elephant dung. Photos of vaginas and recta, clipped from adult magazines, also festooned artist Chris Ofilis depiction of Jesus mom.
The city shouldnt have to pay for sick stuff, Giuliani said. Often decried by Giuliani critics as an attack on free speech, he merely asked why such a provocative work could not appear in a private museum, without government subsidy.
Meanwhile, ex-pornography mecca Times Square now welcomes families, tourists, and locals for fully clothed musicals like The Lion King and Mary Poppins. Under Giuliani, the city prohibited sex shops within 500 feet of schools, churches, and residential communities.
Beyond these socially conservative victories, Giuliani governed as a Reaganesque supply-sider:
Giuliani scrapped three taxes and slashed 20 others, lowering Gothams tax burden by 17 percent and saving individual and business taxpayers $9.8 billion. A family of four earning $50,000 saw its local taxes plummet 23.7 percent.
While inflation averaged 3.9 percent, Giulianis average spending grew 2.9 percent annually. If the departed GOP Congress were that fiscally disciplined, the next federal budget would be $2.275 trillion $625 billion cheaper, Cato Institute fiscal analyst Stephen Slivinski calculates.
While hiring 12 percent more cops and 12.8 percent more teachers, Giuliani sliced other positions 17.2 percent. Overall, municipal headcount fell 3.1 percent.
These policies helped cut local unemployment from 10.4 percent in 1993 to 5.7 percent in 2001. Tourist arrivals rose 32 percent in that period, while the Big Apples population grew 9.3 percent. People who came stuck around, and those already here stopped evacuating, as they were doing before Giuliani Time. Not insignificantly, the personal incomes of New Yorkers ballooned 53 percent during Giulianis tenure.
Rudy got this done thanks largely to a management style that he described Wednesday at a $2 million Manhattan fundraiser: Im impatient and single-minded about my goals.
Giulianis legacy has earned him the endorsements of such screaming liberals as President Bushs former solicitor general, Ted Olson, as well as Senator David Vitter (R., La.) and Congressman Pete Sessions (R., Texas) both proud owners of 100 percent ratings from the National Right to Life Committee.
Before Giulianis enemies caricature him as a divorce-driven, abortion-peddling, gun-grabbing transvestite, he should familiarize Republicans with his mayoral accomplishments. From Westwood to Washingtons echo chamber, Rudy Giuliani and his supporters should specify how he rescued Americas largest left-wing city through Reaganite social and economic reforms.
Deroy Murdock is a New York-based columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution.