Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Renowned Cosmologist Draws Sold-Out Crowd (Stephen Hawking)
The Daily Californian ^ | March 14, 2007 | Andrea Lu

Posted on 03/14/2007 9:15:46 PM PDT by dayglored

Last night, nearly 3,000 people received a mini lesson on the origin of the universe from perhaps the world’s most famous cosmologist, Stephen Hawking.

Hawking spoke to a packed audience in Zellerbach Hall about how Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity and quantum theory explained the creation of the universe.

...

His lecture, which touched upon subjects such as black holes and spacetime, was peppered with quips that drew laughs from the audience.

“If one believed that the universe had a beginning, the obvious question was, what happened before the beginning,” Hawking said. “What was God doing before He made the world?"

...

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycal.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bigbang; god; hawking; posterchild; universe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
Hawking is a brilliant scientist. He expounded on how science is ever better able to explain the events that followed the Big Bang (how the universe was created).

Yet his comments about "what God was doing before He made the world", while humorous, point to the fact that the closer our scientists get to a description of the Big Bang, the closer they come to concluding that God did it.

IMO, a clear demonstration that advancing scientific understanding of the universe, and belief in the existence of God as the Creator of the Universe, are not only compatible, BUT VERY LIKELY THE SAME THING.

As one trained in Physics, and who has an unshakable belief in God as the Creator, I find Hawking's comments quite interesting and pleasing. Of course, your mileage may vary, depending on your own beliefs...

1 posted on 03/14/2007 9:15:49 PM PDT by dayglored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Why did the headline, to me, read cosmetologist?


2 posted on 03/14/2007 9:19:16 PM PDT by DalcoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DalcoTX
> Why did the headline, to me, read cosmetologist?

I think that's a different kind of "Big Bang"...

3 posted on 03/14/2007 9:21:18 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
Lol!!! I am sure I don't know what you are talking about. However...you must agree that the words are awfully close.
4 posted on 03/14/2007 9:23:12 PM PDT by DalcoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
Fon Creation Story

In the beginning there was nothing but Nzame. This god is really three: Nzame, Mebere, and Nkwa. It was the Nzame part of the god that created the universe and the earth, and brought life to it. While the three parts of Nzame were admiring this creation, it was decided to create a ruler for the earth. So was created the elephant, the leopard, and the monkey, but it was decided that something better had to be created. Between the three of them they made a new creature in their image, and called him Fam (power), and told him to rule the earth. Before long, Fam grew arrogant, he mistreated the animals and stopped worshipping Nzame. Nzame, angered, brought forth thunder and lightning and destroyed everything that was, except Fam, who had been promised immortality. Nzame, in his three aspects, decided to renew the earth and try again. He applied a new layer of earth to the planet, and a tree grew upon it. The tree dropped seeds which grew into more trees. Leaves that dropped from them into the water became fish, those that dropped on land became animals. The old parched earth still lies below this new one, and if one digs deep enough it can be found in the form of coal. Nzame made a new man, one who would know death, and called him Sekume. Sekume fashioned a woman, Mbongwe, from a tree. These people were made with both Gnoul (body) and Nissim (soul). Nissim gives life to Gnoul. When Gnoul dies, Nissim lives on. They produced many children and prospered.

http://www.gateway-africa.com/stories/"
5 posted on 03/14/2007 9:23:28 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

You know, in every science, the more those that are learned study their fields, the more their findings support the Bible, rather than detracting from it. This comes as a suprise to some.


6 posted on 03/14/2007 9:24:18 PM PDT by Polak z Polski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DalcoTX
> Lol!!! I am sure I don't know what you are talking about. However...you must agree that the words are awfully close.

Agreed... What I was referring to was, I had a close friend years ago who was a cosmetologist, and she was also one of the more "cosmic" people I've ever known (into horoscopes, crystals, cosmic vibrations, etc.). Her views on the Big Bang were a riot.

7 posted on 03/14/2007 9:26:20 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

I'm trained as a mechanical engineer, into thermodynamics. If you know your thermo, you have to understand that the laws do not in anyway preclude the existence of God, as many claim. As you get into quantum uncertainty, it becomes even more difficult to not believe in a God. That leaves a lot of room for interpretation, but it is certainly a far cry from the academic atheism taught in college.


8 posted on 03/14/2007 9:27:15 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Makes as much sense as any of the other creation stories man has created.
9 posted on 03/14/2007 9:27:37 PM PDT by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 11/05/1979.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Polak z Polski
You know, in every science, the more those that are learned study their fields, the more their findings support the Bible, rather than detracting from it. This comes as a suprise to some.

Well, that's not the case for the global flood story.

Geologists gave up on that idea about 30 years before Darwin's monumental publication.

10 posted on 03/14/2007 9:28:13 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
Freaking hilarious. I have a few friends that are enlightened as such. I appreciate the reply.
11 posted on 03/14/2007 9:28:59 PM PDT by DalcoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet; Coyoteman
> Makes as much sense as any of the other creation stories man has created.

I rather like the way the Big Bang is developing as a Creation Story. It has wonder and charm, power and glory, and points back to an unknowable "creation moment". Backed by Science, yet not in conflict with faith (of a certain kind, of course).

Suits me fine, anyway.

12 posted on 03/14/2007 9:32:05 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
> I'm trained as a mechanical engineer, into thermodynamics. If you know your thermo, you have to understand that the laws do not in anyway preclude the existence of God, as many claim. As you get into quantum uncertainty, it becomes even more difficult to not believe in a God. That leaves a lot of room for interpretation, but it is certainly a far cry from the academic atheism taught in college.

I'm about 30 years past my college thermo, but I agree with you that the more one studies science, the more one is presented with the notion of God. It's only a question of what one chooses to believe.

You can choose either one without the other, but for me, the combination is unbeatable.

13 posted on 03/14/2007 9:35:53 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

"...the closer our scientists get to a description of the Big Bang, the closer they come to concluding that God did it."

Uh, no. They don't. And Hawking doesn't conclude that God did it. He's just using colorful language.


14 posted on 03/14/2007 9:37:01 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DalcoTX

"Lol!!! I am sure I don't know what you are talking about. However...you must agree that the words are awfully close."

They are close because they come from the same Greek word: kosmos, which refers to order, or an orderly arrangement. Cosmology has to do with the orderly arrangement of the universe and cosmotology has to do with the orderly arrangement of the face.


15 posted on 03/14/2007 9:41:45 PM PDT by Lucas McCain (The gene pool could use a little chlorine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
> "In the beginning there was nothing but Nzame. This god is really three: Nzame, Mebere, and Nkwa. It was the Nzame part of the god that created the universe and the earth, and brought life to it..."

I was going to say, one advantage of the scientific Big Bang creation story over the various religious ones, is that the names of the players are more familiar and easier to pronounce. Then I remembered we're talking all those subatomic particles, various quarks, bosons, and whatnot, so maybe our scientific names aren't much better than Nzame, Mebere, and Nkwa.

OTOH, the fact that the scientific story hangs together with some really fine mathematics is something none of the religious stories can claim.

16 posted on 03/14/2007 9:42:40 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Do we not now have better research technology? I would think if it was given over a hundred years ago it is a cold case, not an unproven case.


17 posted on 03/14/2007 9:47:04 PM PDT by Right in Wisconsin (Have a Happy Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mlo
> Uh, no. They don't. And Hawking doesn't conclude that God did it. He's just using colorful language.

Agreed, and that conclusion wouldn't belong in a scientific lecture, either. I only said that his use of that question about God indicates that a synthesis of scientific explanation for post-Big Bang events, with a belief in God as the pre-Big Bang mover, is something that human scientists should ponder.

Large and difficult philosophical issues are often addressed initially with light-hearted humor. I believe that at age 65, Hawking has come to the realization that talking about God and science in the same lecture, even in the same paragraph, is entirely acceptable, and I think he does a service to his listeners by challenging them to think about God even as they think about the science of the beginning of the universe.

18 posted on 03/14/2007 9:48:19 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

>> Yet his comments about "what God was doing before He made the world",

The remark is a conundrum and, if not deliberately farcical, insulting.


19 posted on 03/14/2007 9:59:06 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
“If one believed that the universe had a beginning, the obvious question was, what happened before the beginning,” Hawking said. “What was God doing before He made the world?"

Some of the comments on this thread indicate Dr. Hawking should have put the < /s > tag after that "quip."

20 posted on 03/14/2007 10:01:49 PM PDT by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 11/05/1979.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson