Posted on 03/13/2007 12:48:56 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
Britain forced Argentina to invade the Falkland Islands, the members of General Leopoldo Galtieri's family said yesterday in their first interview since the 1982 conflict.
The widow and children of Argentina's former military ruler claimed that the war was engineered by Britain to avoid negotiations that could have led to the loss of sovereignty over the islands.
Speaking to The Daily Telegraph in the Buenos Aires apartment where Galtieri lived with his wife Lucia until his death in 2003, his son Carlos said: "I am convinced the English wanted the conflict to happen. They had realised they were going to have to negotiate (under the aegis of the United Nations). So what did they do? They made Argentina look like an aggressor."
A UN resolution was passed in 1965 asserting that the Falklands constituted a colony and calling on Britain and Argentina to negotiate. But the 1982 conflict extinguished all hopes of negotiations.
After weeks of growing tension, Argentina sent a force to occupy Port Stanley on April 2, 1982 and, in the weeks that followed, Margaret Thatcher, the prime minister, sent a task force to win back the islands. By the time Argentina surrendered on June 14, 255 Britons and 655 Argentinians had died. But the family insists that the widely accepted version of events - in which Galtieri figures as a wicked, drunken dictator who started a war to distract an increasingly discontented nation - is wrong.
"History is written by the winners. But the losers know the truth," said Mrs Galtieri, sitting alongside her son.
Vilified after the war, which led to the collapse of the military junta in 1983, Galtieri refused, until his death, to speak publicly except to say he had "no regrets".
After a "period of respect" for his father, his son explained, the family had decided to speak now, only on the subject of the Falklands, weeks away from the April 2 anniversary of the beginning of the conflict.
"I think that after 25 years it is time to start talking about this again, to seek a solution," said Carlos.
"Now is the moment to take action to see if it is possible to resolve the last example of traditional colonialism that exists in Latin America."
Using coffee table ornaments and a pot of plastic tulips to demonstrate movements by both countries around the islands, the family claimed that Britain deliberately overreacted to the arrival of a group of Argentinian scrap workers on South Georgia in March 1982, creating a diplomatic stand-off and a military build-up that left Galtieri with "no option" but to invade.
If Galtieri had accepted the British demand that the workers have their passports stamped to remain on the islands, he would effectively have been dropping Argentina's 150-year-old claim to sovereignty over the islands the Argentinians known as Las Malvinas, they said.
"He rang me in the morning to tell me they had recovered the Malvinas," remembered Mrs Galtieri, smoking nervously as she spoke.
"I thought, 'My husband is a patriot. The last in Argentina'."
The general, the family said, was an honourable military man who felt a duty to defend the Argentinian belief that "Las Malvinas son Argentinas" (The Malvinas islands are Argentine).
"He had no regrets. He had a clear conscience," said Carlos.
The family laughed at the idea that Galtieri had used the conflict to stay in power amid growing public protests. Galtieri would have preferred to have focused on plans to return the country to a democratically elected government within two years, they said.
"He never wanted to be president," the whole family shouted, one voice rising over another.
"He was not a politician. He was a military man. But he accepted the job because he felt it was his responsibility."
Few Argentinians sympathise with the Galtieri family or share their views.
Like many other military leaders, until his death Galtieri risked abuse or egg throwing if he ventured out of his home.
Once democracy was restored in 1983, Argentina's military leaders were pursued for human rights abuses during the seven-year-long dirty war. Galtieri served five years of an 11-year sentence for "mismanagement" of the Falklands conflict before being pardoned by then president Carlos Menem. When he died, he was under house arrest for alleged involvement in the abduction of babies born to detained dissidents.
Well, if true, all Argentina would have had to do to thwart Britain's plans was to not invade the Falklands.
He was a good dictator, really...
Whatever.
And while we are on the subject... the Falklands are not like other colonial territories. The residents WANT to be part of the UK, by an overwhelming majority. It's not like the UK hasn't been willing to shed colonies the last 40 years. They just don't want to shed ones where the people actually want to be a part of the UK.
Hispanics blaming the Anglo. Spain battling England. Catholic fighting Protestants. A hardy perennial. Same wacko drama is acted out daily in the United States with illegal immigration
Yes...most of them have trees!
That is a pretty weird position. So no Argentinians ever visited the Falklands by getting their passports stamped by the British in all those 150 years? I find that quite difficult to believe. The Argentinians provoked the conflict, the British simply insisted on normal protocol.
Nearly every resident of the Falklands wanted to remain part of Brittan.
Argentina Invaded the islands and set up a military outpost to try to keep and control the islands.
Brittan simply gathered up a suppressor force and threw the invaders out. Also kicking the Argentine military asses on the way.
Brittan simply defended its territory unlike say the U.S. in regards to its own southern border.
The Chileans Gave the Brits AIR Cover by placing their radars on their territory in the southern city Punta Arenas. The Radars were Brought from Australia and the Ozzies transhipped them through Easter Island where ozzies wore Chilean Uniforms when weekly Lan Chile Flights were on the Island.
Please Don't Forget the GURKAS they Probably would have had registered the most Kills.lopping off heads...."great Book Don't Cry for me Sargeant Major"
according to sources they counted the Generals Whiskey cases in the Trash to see how delusional he was in the Casa Rosada. Generalisimo was passed out drunk when The Head of the Air Force finally Surrendered on behalf of all of Argentina and ended the madness.Most argentines I knew sincerely believed they were winning,unti they lost!.
How is and was relations between Chile and Argentina?
Gotta believe it ate at the Argentines that chile lined up against them?
Argentina was in a Financial Basket case chile had just privatised their social security and Uk style medical system. Argentina was envious of all the Foreign Investment in Chile and Couldn't understand their socialist way of life was sucking with 1000% Inflation. Argentina was going to attack Chile but John Paul the Great intervened. So they attacked Falklands.
Still a Bit of Animosity today... Remember at the end of World war II Argentina was the 3rd largest economy in the world.Their sel esteem was hurt.
Chile and Argentina have a history of tension. There is still some disputed territories in the south of both countries. They have fought some short but intense wars in living memory, although I believe relations are much improved these days.
I guess France and Britain made Hitler invade Poland.
ping
Thanks for the info
Most of the good units in the Argentinian Army were on the Chilean border the entire Falklands War. It came as no surprise to them.
LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.