Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
3 posted on
03/12/2007 11:15:34 PM PDT by
saganite
To: SunkenCiv
4 posted on
03/12/2007 11:18:09 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Go to: http://www.TheVanguard.org)
To: LibWhacker
I have Schrodinger's Toilet at my house- I flush it, and if I walk away it keeps running. If I stand and watch it- it stops.
I know it's a combination of waves and particles. Very large particles.
6 posted on
03/12/2007 11:22:39 PM PDT by
fat city
(What part of cognitive dissonance don't you understand?)
To: LibWhacker
That was surprisingly light reading.
|
|
|
To: LibWhacker
80 years my ass. I've known this for 25 years and how could I have known it unless I read it somewhere?
9 posted on
03/12/2007 11:36:38 PM PDT by
jwh_Denver
("Planet of the Apes" happened because people wouldn't proof read their posts.)
To: LibWhacker
cool physics bump for later........
10 posted on
03/12/2007 11:44:04 PM PDT by
indthkr
To: LibWhacker
Afshars experiment consists of the clever idea of putting small absorbing wires at the exact position of the dark interference fringes, where you expect no light, Knoesel said. He then observed that the wires do not change the total light intensity, so there are really dark fringes at the position of the wires. That proves that light also behaves as a wave in the same experiment in which it behaves as a particle. I don't get it. I stand in the sun, and my body casts a shadow, and my hand's shadow disappears when I move it into my trunk shadow. Are these learned Solons saying that my hand shadow can still be discerned in some way?
11 posted on
03/12/2007 11:44:52 PM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: Bellflower
13 posted on
03/13/2007 12:14:33 AM PDT by
Bittersweetmd
(God is Great and greatly to be praised.)
To: LibWhacker
So it's a desert topping
and a floor wax?
L
18 posted on
03/13/2007 1:37:56 AM PDT by
Lurker
(Calling islam a religion is like calling a car a submarine.)
To: LibWhacker
Thanks for illuminating this subject.
To: LibWhacker
If true it's pretty odd that guys like Einstein and Bohr didn't think of it first.
21 posted on
03/13/2007 4:12:55 AM PDT by
bkepley
To: LibWhacker
Not bragging, but in 1979 I got thrown out of Physics 101 because I would not let go of this exact theory, It was heresy in the Physics world at the time. The professor would hear none of it. Seemed only logical to me at the time. He accused me of "Star Trek" physics. Well joke on him. Roddenberry turned out to be right on many things that have been verified since then.
25 posted on
03/13/2007 5:11:11 AM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(So many geeks, so few circuses.)
To: LibWhacker
Flores continued, It is interesting to note that even after 80 years we can still gain a better understanding about the nature of light using refined measurement techniques and creative ideas and therefore are able add to the vast insights of former scientists.
Except when challenging something like the Big Bang by demonstrating that red shift of quasars and galaxies is only partly due to recessional velocity. The answer to this is to refuse publication to those scientists who claim otherwise and to lock them out of the observatories.
27 posted on
03/13/2007 5:21:43 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: LibWhacker
Interesting how we are seeing the demise of a number of major theories. Sounds wierd but this makes light sound a bit like it has some characteristics of water....
29 posted on
03/13/2007 6:08:15 AM PDT by
applpie
To: LibWhacker
I have alway been confused by the idea of light as waves, since waves require some type of medium to propagate them (the way sound waves can only move through air or water, but not in a vacuum.)
So it always seemed to me that if light is made of waves, it would not travel through space.
I'm no physicist, but I did study acoustics in music school back in the '70s.
I know that light does have some characteristics of waves, but it always struck me that it fundamentally had to be comprised of particles.
31 posted on
03/13/2007 9:31:07 AM PDT by
Maceman
(This is America. Why must we press "1" for English?)
To: LibWhacker
Light is made of particles AND waves, not OR
Yes, I knew that. Thank you junior-year physics!
32 posted on
03/13/2007 2:30:53 PM PDT by
G8 Diplomat
(Life is full of change....it's called calculus)
To: LibWhacker
This evidence tends to prove that science should be left to credentialed scientists and not circulated in the general population.
36 posted on
03/13/2007 3:50:00 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
To: LibWhacker
This dual nature of light led to the insight that all fundamental physical objects include a wave and a particle aspect, even electrons, protons and students.
I love a guy with a sense of humor.
41 posted on
03/13/2007 4:31:08 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Physicist; RadioAstronomer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson