Posted on 03/09/2007 6:44:43 PM PST by LdSentinal
"..if someone didn't witness first-hand what he achieved in NYC, and the battles that were fought to get there, they really can't ever understand who he is. .."
Tell that to preborn babies who burned to death from saline in earlier abortions, or get ripped apart from partial-birth abortions.
Here is a little civics lesson CONGRESS PASSES THE LAW!!! CONGRESS PASSES THE BUDGET!!!! THE PRESIDENT SIGNS OR VETOS THE LAWS!!! THE PRESIDENT SIGNS OR VETOS THE BUDGET!!!! That is how it works.. Hunter is good at passing laws and passing budgets.. Not a good sign for someone to be an Executive. Also is to warm cozy with the unions..
Well if Roe vs Wade is overturned, the issue of abortion is going to be decided by state by state again.. As it should....
Hmmmmm ..?? How do you wear a "suite" ..??
John Hawkins: Would you like to see Roe v. Wade overturned?
Duncan Hunter: Yes. You know, I'm the author of the personhood-at-conception bill which right now has over 100 co-sponsors ...that would define personhood as moment of conception, so, it would allow us to have a reversal of the effects of Roe v. Wade without a constitutional amendment.
http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=114155
Didn't some people lose the past election cause of this???
A lot of the Defense company guys do NOT like Hunter and no, they are NOT the BIG MONEY GUYS anyway.
Hunter will be lucky to still be breathing ( in a political way ) next February 20th. He'll still be on the bottom of the barrel and nobody will be leaving the top tier guys.
Your wishful thinking is in complete discord with reality.
Even if he does win, he is going to get his butt handed to him in the national election...
The unions love that.
***So the blue collar democrats who vote their pocket books might vote for him? That proves that he has wide appeal. The illegal immigration thing is another one with wide appeal across party lines. Prop 187 passed in caleefornia with heavy MSM drumbeating against it, low polls, liberal electorate, and it passed with a good margin. When you have the right approach to issues that resonate, you win elections. Rudy has the wrong approach to issues that resonate with the socon base, so he splits the base. Then he's going to go after the same middle ground voters that Hillary owns, and as soon as the MSM turns on him he won't even have Bob Dole's numbers.
Which is better for the party, [win or lose the election] a republican who splits the base (perhaps permanently) or one who solidifies the base and draws middle class crossover votes?
Who do you support for POTUS, sir?
Here's more of why I like DUNCAN HUNTER:
DUNCAN HUNTER announcement speech
"China is cheating on trade. They are piling up over 200 billion U.S. dollars each year as a result and they are buying ships, planes and missiles with American trade dollars.
They have purchased Russian Sovreignny Class missile cruisers designed to destroy American aircraft carriers.
They have built between 750 and 1,000 medium range ballistic missiles and they have 17 submarines under construction.
How are they cheating? China gives 17% tax rebate to their exporters and a 17% penalty to our businesses who export to them. In addition, they maintain a 40% currency devaluation just to make sure the U.S. business doesn’t win.
This is not free trade. This is not fair trade. It’s cheating and if we put up with it, then we are disserving not only business and workers, but also our security.
If this was a football game, it means China has put 74 points on the score board before the opening kick-off.
Our own head of the Federal Reserve Board, Mr. Bernanke, went to China a few weeks ago and wrote a speech describing China’s currency manipulation as a “subsidy.” Then he pulled those words out so as not to anger his Communist hosts.
I thought Republicans didn’t believe in appeasing Communists.
This isn’t a game. It is pulling apart American’s Arsenal of Democracy which has saved the world three times in the last century and will be called on to do so again.
As President, I will make sure that our businesses and workers get a level playing field. I will do this because our security is at stake."
excerpt: http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/hunter/hunter012507sp.html
The general public can't contact the Hunter for President campaign through e-mail. It's snail mail only unless you are part of the media.
Yes, they did.
Then if Hunter had any smarts why in the heck did he choose someone associated with Abramoff(sp)???
Troublemarker! :-)
Don't you know Duncan Hunter walks on water and the sun shines out of his...well never mind
There is an new rule for Free Republic.. Thou shall not question Duncan Hunter...
The fetus at 20 weeks gestation "is fully capable of experiencing pain. … Without question, all of this is a dreadfully painful experience for any infant subjected to such a surgical procedure." — Robert J. White, M.D., PhD., professor of neurosurgery at Case Western University, Cleveland, Ohio, in testimony before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, March 21, 1996
DD 214 ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.