If you like, you and that handful like you can start a manners movement. It will give you something to occupy your time while actual conservatives do the heavy lifting. You can be a "conservative" fellow traveler while handing out books full of Dear Abby and Ask Ann Landers. The left is not harmed by distracting its eccentrics with vegetarianism, twelvesome liberation fronts, interspecies sex advocates, one shower a year clubs, and what not. Conservatives can thrive when the "their turn to curtsy, their turn to bow" wussie caucus are concentrating on the really important things like whoring after "human respect" from the enemies of our civilization.
This country's SCOTUS and the militantly immoral left have achieved the 50 million marker in slaughtered innocent babies and all you worry about is manners. You are no ally of mine. Ann is. You are no ally of the conservative movement. Ann is a vital part of it. She counts. You don't.
If you think our enemies are owed respect, pay it to them (as publicly as possible so we will know who you are). I won't. Thirty-five years ago, I noticed that leftists hate nothing more than they hate being laughed at. It totally disarms them because they take themselves and their lunatic causes sooooooo seriously. They become disabled by rage in the presence of conservatives who make fun of them. The faggoty Breck girl/Silky Pony is a perfect example.
BTW, again, the Beck Girl/SilkyPony''s foreign policy, military policy, spending policy, social issues policies, abortion policy, lavender queen policy, among others are faggot policies. He is effeminate (hours fussing with his hair each day). He seeks the nomination of the faggot-loving party. Ergo, he is a faggot. The left does not define the meaning of words. The dictionary does. The older the better.
If you do not have the stomach for combat, get out of the way. Stirring the base and adding to it win campaigns. Even Nixon derided McGovern as the candidate of "acid, amnesty and abortion" to great effect. Agnew had great effect attacking the media in ways from which they have not been able to recover yet. See the history of what happened to leftist columnist Drew Pearson when he (truthfully) outed a lavender ring in Reagan's first gubernatorial administration. Reagan shut Pearson's mouth as to Reagan permanently by challenging Pearson the next day on statewide California live televised news conference to explain Pearson's arrest on morals charges in St. Louis in 1918 or 1919. Reagan rid himself promptly of all of the perps and never had that sort of problem in his governments again. Reagan's words (for those who regard our best man and best president as a wimp) were roughly: "Before Drew Pearson takes up his tripewriter again or a grease pencil to scrawl his obscenites on an outhouse wall which is the only place they might belong, he should explain the details of his own arrest on morals charges in St. Louis in 1918" (or 1919).
Of course, you and some others here will be tempted to accuse Ronaldus Maximus of political opportunism at the expense of Pearson, and opportunism that lowered the tone of the "debate" (there is NO debate and hasn't been one for many years) or that he had a "big mouth" and wanted "lots of press" even though what he said reflected negatively on Drew Pearson (pooooor Drew Pearson) or on those objective icons of the working press who had to bear hearing such inconsiderate (well, just rude really!!!) even before their traditional meal of spaghettied spine of weakling "rightist" (which Reagan never was).
Reagan chose his moments while Annie is on autoattack but she is not running for office. She makes our candidates look soooooooo much more "moderate" unless they would like to compete with her.
#183 is directed to you. The others pinged are not the target but are pinged for sensible previous posts on the subject.
Excuse me BlackElk, please show me my post where I criticize Ann OR have shown respect to my enemies. I have done NOTHING but stand up for her rights to speak HER MIND as she choses. I really have NO IDEA what your rant is about.
Actually, I never said that. I simply don't think you win votes by having arrogant blondes insulting candidates to draw attention to HERSELF. And FYI, I'm extremely conservative. Perhaps you meant to accuse me of not being an ally to the Republican Party - it's not nearly conservative enough for me.
PLEASE, Do NOT respond to me again. Your rant is ridiculous.
These days faggot means homosexual. You have no proof that Edwards is a homosexual, only that he is a bit effeminate. In fact, if he were not a public figure, you could be charged with libel for your ridiculous rant. DO NOT respond to me again.
I am happy to agree to disagree, but I refuse to argue with someone who makes unfounded, libelous accusations. Lies don't belong in debates.
Have a good day.
Reagan rid himself promptly of all of the perps and never had that sort of problem in his governments again. Reagan's words (for those who regard our best man and best president as a wimp) were roughly: "Before Drew Pearson takes up his tripewriter again or a grease pencil to scrawl his obscenites on an outhouse wall which is the only place they might belong, he should explain the details of his own arrest on morals charges in St. Louis in 1918" (or 1919).
---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---
GREAT quote. Also, great explanation of the true meaning of Ann's wonderful screed and implication, her "schoolyard taunt" of sKEdwards, and your personal observation (and mine, and Ann's) that the best weapon we have against the libidiots is to make fun of them.