Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reuters Counts 9/11 Hijackers as 9/11 Victims
http://newsbusters.org/ ^ | March 8, 2007 | Ken Shepherd

Posted on 03/08/2007 5:35:13 PM PST by lowbridge

Reuters Counts 9/11 Hijackers as 9/11 Victims

Posted by Ken Shepherd on March 8, 2007 - 18:15.

From the March 8 edition of James Taranto's Best of the Web. (H/t: Nathan Burchfiel):

Another Man's Victim?

Reuters has a cute little human interest story about funny people from Vermont holding "town meetings" where they call for President Bush's impeachment. What caught our eye was not the darling little Vermonters, though, but something in this paragraph:

Doug Dunbebin, who walked door-to-door collecting signatures to get the question onto the town meeting ballot, said there are still unanswered questions about September 11, 2001, when hijacked plane attacks killed 2,992 people at New York's World Trade Center, at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania.

That number, 2,992, looked unfamiliar to us. We went back and looked at our December item on the Associated Press's bogus "grim milestone" (U.S. military deaths in Iraq surpassing total 9/11 deaths), and sure enough, the AP's 9/11 count was different: 2,973 to be exact.

What's the difference between 2,992 and 2,973? Nineteen. It seems Reuters is counting the terrorists--or should that be "freedom fighters"?--among the victims of 9/11.

For a full list of previous NewsBusters posts on Reuters bias, click here.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 911; alreuters; bias; biasmeanslayoffs; enemedia; liberalmedia; mediabias; mediajihad; mslm; msm; reuters; sept11; september11; trysellingthetruth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2007 5:35:17 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

bump


2 posted on 03/08/2007 5:38:23 PM PST by lowbridge ("Of course Americans should vote Democrat" -Jihad Jaara, senior member, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

So killed = victim. What dictionary are they using?


3 posted on 03/08/2007 5:40:38 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Al-Reuters. Reprobates.


4 posted on 03/08/2007 5:43:13 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Yea, victims of their own idiocy.


5 posted on 03/08/2007 5:43:35 PM PST by doc1019 (Fred Thompson 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Shows the total moral bankruptcy of the liberal media.

I'm surprised these people have the discernment to make it through a single day without falling out a window or walking into traffic.
Either they are totally stupid or they just sympathize with evil.

6 posted on 03/08/2007 5:43:46 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Just shows how fundamentally corrupt Roto-Reuters is.


7 posted on 03/08/2007 5:49:16 PM PST by Clint Williams (Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
Just shows how fundamentally corrupt Roto-Reuters is.

Do you think the terrorists weren't killed when those airplanes stuck the WTC, Pentagon, ground?

Are they still alive?

8 posted on 03/08/2007 5:58:01 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Be much better to be able to count Reuters as among those killed on account of 9/11.

I doubt if they share that value judgment, but that's because they're all punks.

9 posted on 03/08/2007 5:59:00 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

That is some clever investigative reporting. Kudos.


10 posted on 03/08/2007 6:01:12 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

According to Wikipedia:

There were 2,973 fatalities, not including the 19 hijackers: 246 on the four planes.

http://tinyurl.com/g5c8l


11 posted on 03/08/2007 6:09:47 PM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Ask Reuters, and they would probably tell you that their preference is to see it as 2973 murderers wantonly killing 19 victims, by getting in the way of the planes they hijacked.


12 posted on 03/08/2007 6:31:31 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Technically speaking, they were additional fatalities, not victims.

When a murderer ends up dead in the course of committing his crime, only the murdered are victims.

Shouldn't matter how hard the Scribes (and Pharisees) in the media try to water down the term, it still has a proper meaning.
13 posted on 03/08/2007 6:38:07 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
Reuters said killed. They did not use the term, victims.

Do you contend the hijackers were not killed on 9/11?

14 posted on 03/08/2007 6:52:41 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
No, but I will contend they weren't killed soon enough.

I read too many intervening posts to remember that "victim' wasn't in the Reuter's quote, but was used frequently afterward.

Lost track. Sorry.
15 posted on 03/08/2007 7:15:23 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

No, they said "when hijacked plane attacks killed 2,992 people". Typically, one does not count the assailants in the total "killed".


16 posted on 03/08/2007 7:23:42 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: montag813
No, they said "when hijacked plane attacks killed 2,992 people". Typically, one does not count the assailants in the total "killed".

Really splitting hairs on this one.

17 posted on 03/08/2007 7:47:58 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Do you contend the hijackers were not killed on 9/11?

Do you contend that the hijackers are people?

18 posted on 03/08/2007 7:57:26 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
It seems Reuters is counting the terrorists--or should that be "freedom fighters"?--among the victims of 9/11.

Just like the Headlines, "Six killed in shooting at Utah mall" (Boston Herald) or "Six dead after Utah mall rampage"(USA Today), number six was of course the deranged Jihadi who had killed the other five.

Or when the Brady Bunch counts the gang bangers shot by police as victims of "gun violence".

19 posted on 03/08/2007 7:58:34 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Do you contend that the hijackers are people?

What?

20 posted on 03/08/2007 8:02:56 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson