1 posted on
03/07/2007 1:41:57 PM PST by
madprof98
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: NYer
2 posted on
03/07/2007 1:43:44 PM PST by
joseph20
To: madprof98
Yeah, they want to support Hillary instead, and see another ACLU lawyer elevated to the SCOTUS.
3 posted on
03/07/2007 1:43:59 PM PST by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: madprof98
Im not a catholic but well said!
6 posted on
03/07/2007 1:47:31 PM PST by
N3WBI3
("Help me out here guys: What do you do with someone who wont put up or shut up?" - N3WBI3)
To: madprof98
Wait a minute. Isn't the NCR a pretty leftish paper?
8 posted on
03/07/2007 1:48:26 PM PST by
Mercat
To: madprof98; All
I am a Roman Catholic and I refuse to let the Roman Catholic Church or any church for that matter tell me who to vote for president.
14 posted on
03/07/2007 1:53:26 PM PST by
areafiftyone
(RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
To: madprof98
From my perspective as an ex-Catholic living in the about most Catholic city in America, this should be of no concern to Rudy. Heck, he still calls himself a catholic, and there is the trouble. I would hazard to guess that upwards of 90% of Catholics are closet protestants in that they don't follow the Catholic doctrine. Not out of ignorance, but out of choice. They feel no need to obey the church, yet they still consider themselves to be catholic.
As a label, "Catholic" is even more meaningless than "Republican".
16 posted on
03/07/2007 1:55:16 PM PST by
shempy
(EABOF in '08)
To: madprof98
How can the church maintain a tax exempt status if they are telling their members how to vote?
I thought discussion of politics was a no-no.
18 posted on
03/07/2007 1:58:39 PM PST by
Kimmers
To: madprof98
Heck I am supporting Fred Thompson who is pro life.
19 posted on
03/07/2007 2:00:10 PM PST by
mware
(By all that you hold dear.. on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
To: madprof98
Maybe Giuliani won't be on the ballot. Perhaps the GOP will perform a partial birth abortion on his candidacy. Guiliani will understand. He knows what happens when someone is not wanted.
20 posted on
03/07/2007 2:01:01 PM PST by
ex-snook
("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
To: madprof98
..sounds like the beginning of pro-life mobilization in this campaign
23 posted on
03/07/2007 2:02:49 PM PST by
WalterSkinner
( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
To: madprof98
The Register simply states the obvious.
This Catholic will never vote for Rudy (or Romney, or any similar liberal) in the primary or general election.
28 posted on
03/07/2007 2:15:28 PM PST by
JohnnyZ
("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
To: madprof98
Some people cannot abide a reasoned argument. Being pro-life as well as a member of this constitutional republic shows a consistency of thought. Without the right to life, there are no other rights. How difficult is that to understand.
Politicians who cannot support the right to life over the right to choose death of another individual have not used their God-given reasoning ability. They are not, as far as I am concerned, eligible to hold political office, especially not that of President of the United States.
Every newspaper should be pointing this out, not just Catholic ones.
30 posted on
03/07/2007 2:22:49 PM PST by
MSSC6644
(Defeat Satan. Pray the Rosary)
To: madprof98
"Would a pro-abortion president give us a pro-life Supreme Court justice? Maybe he would in his first term."
This is what they wrote? Do they even understand the makeup of the Court? Only one more originalist is needed to take down Roe, and the next President will get 2 picks very early in their term.
So they tell me "maybe he would in his first term" - hell, that's all that's needed.
To: madprof98
Good for them!! It's only going to get worse for Rudy.
39 posted on
03/07/2007 2:36:30 PM PST by
don-o
(Fight, fight. fight to drive the GOP to the right!!!!)
To: cpforlife.org
41 posted on
03/07/2007 2:39:22 PM PST by
OneLoyalAmerican
(Truth was the first casualty in the MSM's war on President Bush.)
To: madprof98
I'm looking into the political bias of the National Catholic Register.
To: madprof98
This is a great article, regardless of whether on is a Catholic or not. The presidential nominee controls the party platform and defines the party. So if Guiliani is nominated, the GOP becomes at least mildly pro-abortion. Then pro-lifers will be without a home, putting more strength in NARAL's arguments that anyone who doesn't support abortion is an "extremist."
This should be a much bigger consideration than what Guilaini might do in office. So long as he appoints conservative judges, there is not a whole lot a president can do. But he can definatly change the party.
53 posted on
03/07/2007 2:47:32 PM PST by
AVNevis
(In memory of Emily Keyes (1990-2006))
To: madprof98
They have a perfect right to say this. It's more than a year until the election, and we don't know who the nominees will be.
I share their concern. I like Giuliani in many ways, but this issue needs to be resolved, one way or another, or it threatens to splinter the conservative coalition.
57 posted on
03/07/2007 2:48:54 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: madprof98
The Republican party had better come forth with a decent candidate. Not a leftist in republican's clothing. Please, never again any more Giuliani's, McCain's, Bloomberg's, or Rell's.
A genuine conservative please, otherwise I'll stay home or vote for mickey mouse.
To: madprof98
Catholics used to be all democrats, this is changing, due to the parties changing. Old Catholics might still vote democrat, but wisely, all new Catholics can't. Democrats are now the party of the devil, if you see it clearly.
62 posted on
03/07/2007 2:56:34 PM PST by
mutley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson