Skip to comments.
Catholic Newspaper Tells Anti-Abortion Voters Not to Support Giuliani
FoxNews.com ^
| March 7, 2007
Posted on 03/07/2007 1:41:55 PM PST by madprof98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-166 next last
1
posted on
03/07/2007 1:41:57 PM PST
by
madprof98
To: NYer
2
posted on
03/07/2007 1:43:44 PM PST
by
joseph20
To: madprof98
Yeah, they want to support Hillary instead, and see another ACLU lawyer elevated to the SCOTUS.
3
posted on
03/07/2007 1:43:59 PM PST
by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: AZRepublican
Yeah, they want to support Hillary instead...
Maybe they actually are acting on their convictions. Maybe they are smart enough to know Hillary will not be the Democrat nominee.
4
posted on
03/07/2007 1:46:24 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Giuliani/Chafee 2008 - For the RINOs who want to send the very best to the White House)
To: AZRepublican
That's such a sad, false argument.
It's not Rudy - vs - Hillary just yet.
5
posted on
03/07/2007 1:47:27 PM PST
by
Enosh
(†)
To: madprof98
Im not a catholic but well said!
6
posted on
03/07/2007 1:47:31 PM PST
by
N3WBI3
("Help me out here guys: What do you do with someone who wont put up or shut up?" - N3WBI3)
To: msnimje
Maybe they are smart enough to know Hillary will not be the Democrat nominee. The dem nominee will be pro baby killing, no matter who it is.
7
posted on
03/07/2007 1:48:25 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: madprof98
Wait a minute. Isn't the NCR a pretty leftish paper?
8
posted on
03/07/2007 1:48:26 PM PST
by
Mercat
To: AZRepublican
I actually saw a really interesting law review article recently -- apparently every single SCOTUS justice appointed since 1935 has drifted ideologically away from how people thought of them when they were appointed. Obviously, people like Souter have drifted more than people like Scalia, but there's still an effect there.
Info like this makes me doubt whether ideology should matter much, if at all, in appointing SCOTUS justices, because we can't predict where they'll end up -- maybe we should just concentrate on qualifications?
9
posted on
03/07/2007 1:48:37 PM PST
by
jmellis
To: AZRepublican
the gop primary is well before the general election.
To: Mercat
You're thinking of the National Catholic Reporter -- very far left.
11
posted on
03/07/2007 1:50:24 PM PST
by
maryz
To: AZRepublican
I keep seeing this crop up on anti-Rudy threads and I'm not sure I understand the 'logic' involved. Has Rudy already clinched the nomination? Is it a fact that if we don't nominate Rudy, we will lose?
12
posted on
03/07/2007 1:52:06 PM PST
by
ECM
(Government is a make-work program for lawyers.)
To: maryz
Yup, you are correct. My bad.
13
posted on
03/07/2007 1:52:07 PM PST
by
Mercat
To: madprof98; All
I am a Roman Catholic and I refuse to let the Roman Catholic Church or any church for that matter tell me who to vote for president.
14
posted on
03/07/2007 1:53:26 PM PST
by
areafiftyone
(RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
To: areafiftyone
Nobody's "telling" anyone to do anything.
To: madprof98
From my perspective as an ex-Catholic living in the about most Catholic city in America, this should be of no concern to Rudy. Heck, he still calls himself a catholic, and there is the trouble. I would hazard to guess that upwards of 90% of Catholics are closet protestants in that they don't follow the Catholic doctrine. Not out of ignorance, but out of choice. They feel no need to obey the church, yet they still consider themselves to be catholic.
As a label, "Catholic" is even more meaningless than "Republican".
16
posted on
03/07/2007 1:55:16 PM PST
by
shempy
(EABOF in '08)
To: areafiftyone
You leave that to "Democrats and Black Churches", right?
17
posted on
03/07/2007 1:55:43 PM PST
by
Enosh
(†)
To: madprof98
How can the church maintain a tax exempt status if they are telling their members how to vote?
I thought discussion of politics was a no-no.
18
posted on
03/07/2007 1:58:39 PM PST
by
Kimmers
To: madprof98
Heck I am supporting Fred Thompson who is pro life.
19
posted on
03/07/2007 2:00:10 PM PST
by
mware
(By all that you hold dear.. on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
To: madprof98
Maybe Giuliani won't be on the ballot. Perhaps the GOP will perform a partial birth abortion on his candidacy. Guiliani will understand. He knows what happens when someone is not wanted.
20
posted on
03/07/2007 2:01:01 PM PST
by
ex-snook
("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-166 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson