Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/06/2007 10:53:28 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Jim Robinson

Asking myself, "Az, would you support a pro-abortion, gun grabbing, liberal candidate?"

As Rudy said, "No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing."


60 posted on 03/07/2007 2:57:48 AM PST by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim for more on Ruby G check our flashbunny's about me page, it is loaded!


66 posted on 03/07/2007 3:37:59 AM PST by stockpirate (Rudy is a cross dresser, He is really a Liberal Democrat dresssed as a Conservative Rupublican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Giuliani, a frequent keynote speaker at NARAL abortion banquets, will appoint people to the Supreme Court who agree with him?

Comforting! /sarc


67 posted on 03/07/2007 4:44:35 AM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Yeah, but as the Rudybots would explain to us, "but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but". Seems they're falling all over their butts. ;)


68 posted on 03/07/2007 4:50:49 AM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; FreeInWV; Reagan Man; Fierce Allegiance; EternalVigilance; B Knotts; jmc813; ...

The premise that "Presidents generally appoint people on the Supreme Court that they believe agree with them" is only part of the story.

We know from our own experience that a president's judicial nominees are subject to intense scrutiny by outside forces----the president's political supporters. The presidential nominee may or may not survive the scrutiny-----I give you Harriet Meirs.

Irregardless of the crumbs he's throwing to conservatives about potential nominees, Rudy is joined at the hip to NARAL, Planned Parenthood, and the most radical pro-abortion elements.

You can bet your bottom dollar judicial picks will be scrutinized, decided upon, and seated, by the NARAL crowd. NO WAY would NARAL permit their boy Rudy to install conservative-leaning judges.

Anybody who believes Rudy would seat conservative judges is smoking something illegal.

The pro-abortion savages have commenced the killing of the innocents. Who knows where it will stop with Rudy controlling the levers of government, and NARAL whispering in his ear?


69 posted on 03/07/2007 4:54:54 AM PST by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Rudy: Presidents generally appoint people on the Supreme Court that they believe agree with them.

They DO???

Whoda thunk!

72 posted on 03/07/2007 5:20:15 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

This election is really eye-opening. I am amazed at the level in which many 'conservatives' will go in the name of whom they think is a 'sure win'. A 'sure win' will most likely turn into disaster not only for Rudy but for the GOP. And if by some reason Rudy did actually become President, the Demonrat Congress and Rudy will become a little too chummy like has been warned and we can thank the enablers for allowing liberal policies to be enacted to no end. Rudy should not be President.


73 posted on 03/07/2007 5:22:24 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Excellent post, and quite obviously correct.

As has been pointed out previously, it is preposterous to imagine that a president would appoint supreme court justices who would protect the people from his own views.

85 posted on 03/07/2007 6:26:03 AM PST by B Knotts (Newt '08! FReepmail me to get on the Newt '08 Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

You Rudy hater! Don't you know that Rudy is the only one who can win?


89 posted on 03/07/2007 7:13:23 AM PST by beltfed308 (Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
..strict constructionist judges eh

More like strict abortionist...

90 posted on 03/07/2007 7:13:57 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; AFA-Michigan; Agitate; Alexander Rubin; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

It should be obvious that were Rudy to be elected president that all we should expect from him is to appoint judges who share his leftist views on homosexuality, abortion, embryonic stem cell research, gun grabbing, etc.

91 posted on 03/07/2007 8:19:11 AM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Did someone just figure this out?

If that's the case, I fear for our country.


95 posted on 03/07/2007 9:52:21 AM PST by ukie55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Excellent catch. We've been hearing from Rudy's surrogates for some weeks now how he's going to appoint conservative justices. We now have Rudy on record stating that this is unlikely. The few excuses that conservatives could have offered for supporting his candidacy have now throughly been debunked.


102 posted on 03/07/2007 11:57:10 AM PST by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
It the ultimate in naivete' for the Guiliani-Apologists to think that he would appoint judges that OPPOSE his basic beliefs.

It's not just naive, it's just plain stupid. It's just crazy to assume that bilge that the JulieAnnie Apologists are trying to peddle.

103 posted on 03/07/2007 12:02:08 PM PST by stockstrader ("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

BTTT


115 posted on 03/08/2007 9:51:40 AM PST by cgk (I am emboldened by my looks to say things Republican men wouldn’t. - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson