Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Jim Robinson
To: Jim Robinson
I think this Rudy guy is one seriously bad candidate for the USA. Ugh.
3 posted on
03/06/2007 10:55:54 PM PST by
Fierce Allegiance
(RINO = Rudy Is Not Ours! Keep scrubbing, Rudy supporters, the blood won't come off.)
To: Jim Robinson; Delphinium; Gelato; Reagan Man; Spiff; dirtboy; Taxman; Ladycalif; Waywardson; ...
4 posted on
03/06/2007 10:56:39 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
(With "Republicans" like these, who needs Democrats?)
To: Jim Robinson
And Presidents appointing like minded people to the courts suprises you how?
6 posted on
03/06/2007 10:57:20 PM PST by
screaming eagle2
(No matter what you call it,a pre-owned vehicle is still a USED CAR!)
To: FreeInWV; Reagan Man; Fierce Allegiance; EternalVigilance; B Knotts; jmc813; Kimberly GG; Sun; ...
Will this be another 'crickets' thread???
7 posted on
03/06/2007 10:57:24 PM PST by
flashbunny
(<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
To: Jim Robinson
"Presidents, going back to the beginning of the republic, generally appoint people on the Supreme Court that they believe agree with them." Precisely! Rudy's words speak for themselves.
Excellent find!
8 posted on
03/06/2007 10:59:20 PM PST by
TAdams8591
(Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
To: Jim Robinson
"Presidents, going back to the beginning of the republic, generally appoint people on the Supreme Court that they believe agree with them." - Rudy Giuliani
"Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine." - Rudy Giuliani
10 posted on
03/06/2007 11:02:43 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
(With "Republicans" like these, who needs Democrats?)
To: Jim Robinson
12 posted on
03/06/2007 11:05:54 PM PST by
dcwusmc
(We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
To: Jim Robinson
He was advocating for Roberts in this transcript, maybe he shouldn't have, I guess we should have just went with Harriet Miers instead.
We well be a lot better off once Republicans start to realize that Rudy is the man and quit cherry picking old meaningless quotes, articles and video clips.
To: Jim Robinson
Presidents, going back to the beginning of the republic, generally appoint people on the Supreme Court that they believe agree with them. So what we take from this is that the one bone tossed the conservatives' way by those pushing Rudolph Giuliani is in fact a plastic one.
15 posted on
03/06/2007 11:09:51 PM PST by
Lexinom
(Duncan Hunter - the electable answer for the WOT and border security. www.gohunter08.com)
To: Jim Robinson
I can't comprehend why a prominent conservative like Sean Hannity and others can't understand that a pro-abortion candidate like Giulinai wouldn't nomination originalists to the court. Hannity has become one of the Kool-Aid drinkers he always criticizes.
To: Jim Robinson
Rudy SAID he would appoint SC Justices like Roberts and Scalia
I'm convinced!
YES! The SC Justices he would appoint would be human, breathe oxygen, exhale carbon dioxide and have been born since 1900.
JUST LIKE Roberts and Scalia.
Yes! Vote early and often for Rudy!
I'm convinced!
Cheers!
24 posted on
03/06/2007 11:20:49 PM PST by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: Jim Robinson
So you dont have a problem with GWB appointing people that agree with HIS opinion that we should do NOTHING about illegals coming into this country?
works both ways
To: Jim Robinson
Three votes against Rudy...
![](http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q298/turkeybrown/Triplets.jpg?t=1173252201)
28 posted on
03/06/2007 11:25:29 PM PST by
Earthdweller
(All reality is based on faith in something.)
To: Jim Robinson
He assumes that SC judges are "very much influenced by precedent", and "should be a very good lawyer". Well, color me unimpressed. No where in his last answers is any mention of the constitution. He sounds like a "stare decisis" kind of guy, and we already have enough of those.
We need judges associated with an originalist or at a minimum a strict constructionist judicial philosophy. I assume if he means to appoint a nominee to SCOTUS that agrees with his political philosophy we are likely to see another O'Conner, or even worse another Souter type of judge on the bench. Yuk! Sounds like shades of the Harriet Meiers failed nomination might return in spades.
35 posted on
03/06/2007 11:32:04 PM PST by
gpapa
(Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
To: Jim Robinson
Good catch. ..and it's really just common sense that Rudy will surround himself with people who think likewise.. just maybe 'conservatives' that welcomed and applauded Rudy at CPAC should be more ashamed at that than what Coulter said.
37 posted on
03/06/2007 11:36:23 PM PST by
SeaBiscuit
(God Bless America..Duncan Hunter 2008.)
To: Jim Robinson
But But Jim, Rudy the only one that can win! He, no his surrogates promised that he would take time off killing babies and gun grabbing and supporting degenerates so we should support him, OK /s
47 posted on
03/06/2007 11:51:00 PM PST by
Dstorm
To: Jim Robinson
Where are the Rudybots on this thread. Did they all go to bed. Or are they afraid to tangle with the Freepers who have posted so far on this thread. Bring 'em on.
49 posted on
03/06/2007 11:54:15 PM PST by
gpapa
(Boost FR Traffic! Make FR your home page!)
To: Jim Robinson
His opponents will have a field day with that material. Ouch!
To: Jim Robinson
I believe that he will put in someone he believes is a "Constitutionalist", but I seriously doubt his appointment will be in favor of abortion.
A liberal Democrat on another board was saying the Democrats would consider it a "moral victory" if JulieAnnie won the election.
58 posted on
03/07/2007 1:54:21 AM PST by
Pinkbell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson