To: Jim Robinson
So you dont have a problem with GWB appointing people that agree with HIS opinion that we should do NOTHING about illegals coming into this country?
works both ways
To: stuck_in_new_orleans
"So you dont have a problem with GWB appointing people that agree with HIS opinion that we should do NOTHING about illegals coming into this country?"
I have a problem with it...
27 posted on
03/06/2007 11:24:51 PM PST by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: stuck_in_new_orleans
Bush43`s two appointments to the SCOTUS are in the early stages of their tenure. What happens 10-20 years down the road is an unknown factor at this time. No one can see into the future. So far, so good.
Bush43 has always been an open borders/amnesty. He supports liberal immigration reform as spelled out in Senate bill S2611. Bush, Giuliani and McCain all want comprehensive immigration reform. They all opposed House bill HR 4437 when it passed the GOP House vote in Dec2005.
29 posted on
03/06/2007 11:28:55 PM PST by
Reagan Man
(FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: stuck_in_new_orleans
Bush's judges are fine by me.
To: stuck_in_new_orleans
So you dont have a problem with GWB appointing people that agree with HIS opinion that we should do NOTHING about illegals coming into this country? works both ways*************
I think you've missed the point. If we don't want judges who are likely to be pro-abortion, anti-second amendment, pro-homosexual marriage, and pro-open borders, we don't want Giuliani as the Republican nominee.
92 posted on
03/07/2007 8:44:05 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson