To: chesley
Sure it's a bad verdict, BUT before we begin blaming liberal jurors, or liberal judges, or liberal Fitz, or the liberal atmosphere in D.C. why don't we ask why Libby decided NOT to testify or subpoena Cheney to the stand for clarification of memory about what he did or did not say about Valerie Plame?
I personally think the defense team stunk up the court on this one!
35 posted on
03/06/2007 11:14:11 AM PST by
meandog
(If it feels good, don't do it!)
To: meandog
Maybe so. My own opinion, however, is that this case should never have been brought to court. If they can't find an underlying crime, they shouldn't be able to go after misleading the investigators. Misleading about what?
39 posted on
03/06/2007 11:20:15 AM PST by
chesley
("Socialism" - The devil made them do it..)
To: meandog; chesley
I believe that the reason Libby didn't testify was because the Defense felt like Fitzfong proved his case, so there was no point in putting Libby on the stand. Correct me if I'm wrong.
200 posted on
03/06/2007 8:20:23 PM PST by
Purrcival
(Dare we hope that even a D.C. jury can sort this Libby trial out? Apparently not.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson