Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juror Explains Libby Verdict (".. what is HE doing here? Where is Rove and all these other guys..")
Editor&Publisher ^ | March 6, 2007 | Greg Mitchell

Posted on 03/06/2007 10:58:42 AM PST by chesley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-296 next last
To: omega4179
"they had biased Libtards stacked on the jury not a trial of Libbys PEERS."

Remember the famous photo from the 1950's era trial of some men accused of murdering civil rights workers, with a bunch of redneck jurors laughing in the jury box, stuffing their mouths with Red Man chewing tobacco? Some conservative cartoonist ought to do the same with this trial, show a bunch of jurors with Obama and Clinton lapel buttons, reading a Michael Moore book.
101 posted on 03/06/2007 12:47:32 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
The statement in and of itself may not be grounds for appeal, but when combined with Fitzgerald's idiotic closing statement it certainly is.

In fact, Fitzgerald went to such great lengths to politicize this trial that it even seemed like he deliberately laid out all these grounds for a successful appeal.

102 posted on 03/06/2007 12:50:08 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Yes


103 posted on 03/06/2007 12:54:24 PM PST by Graycliff (Long haired freaky people, need not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito
For that matter, if this was Libby's trial, what led them to want Rove, et al's skin?

I believe part of Libby's defense was to claim that the White House set him up to take the fall for Karl Rove... that might be why the jury was asking, "Where's Karl Rove?"
104 posted on 03/06/2007 12:59:28 PM PST by California74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito
For that matter, if this was Libby's trial, what led them to want Rove, et al's skin?

I believe part of Libby's defense was to claim that the White House set him up to take the fall for Karl Rove... that might be why the jury was asking, "Where's Karl Rove?"
105 posted on 03/06/2007 12:59:28 PM PST by California74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

I'd swear I'd seen that face in a larson cartoon.


106 posted on 03/06/2007 1:03:36 PM PST by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: chesley

To the jurors--payback and karma are a bitch--remember that the next time you are the "screwee."


107 posted on 03/06/2007 1:12:38 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

This should have been a mistrial. The dismissed juror showed everyone the media item she viewed. Tainted jury = mistrial.


108 posted on 03/06/2007 1:14:45 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Has anyone seen the racial makeup of the jury??

I feel that was a big zero for the Republican side.

DC is about 75% black, and 25% rich Whites across the park who are too slick to sit on a jury.


109 posted on 03/06/2007 1:23:57 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

No, but no matter the color of the jurors, it was an OJ jury.


110 posted on 03/06/2007 1:31:20 PM PST by chesley ("Socialism" - The devil made them do it..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Good afternoon.
"Juries mostly consist of people who are too stupid to figure out how to get out of doing jury duty."

I disagree. I think most jurors take their obligation seriously and do the best they can with what they are allowed to see and to decide about.

There have always been aberrations, such as the OJ jury, but in general most haven't thought like you.

I think that is changing and bias in some form or another will become the norm. I also think the Left and minorities will benefit from this and the Right will suffer.

Michael Frazier
111 posted on 03/06/2007 1:45:11 PM PST by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Not sure about which district he can appeal, but I really don't know the makeup of the courts at the district. I guess he could get lucky.


112 posted on 03/06/2007 2:21:29 PM PST by agincourt1415 (The Sum of all Fears: Democrats running the war or trying to run away from the war on terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: chesley
Why do matters not before the jurors color their deliberations? The demon Rove, genocide-monger Dick Cheney and the clueless tool George Bush should not have been in the minds of the jurors.
How did a jounalist make it onto the the jury? What was the Libby defense team thinking?
113 posted on 03/06/2007 2:33:38 PM PST by thegreatbeast (Selling Carbon Offsets since 2007. Get right with Gaia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Why was Denis Collins, a former reporter for the Washington Post, allowed to sit on a jury where all of the key witnesses for the prosecution were reporters?

More here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1796312/posts


114 posted on 03/06/2007 3:22:09 PM PST by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley; zot

I wonder if the jury, iff all sound like this one, will end up talking an appealate court into over turning the conviction. Sounds like they were out to get Bush and took Libby as a "consolation prize."


115 posted on 03/06/2007 4:20:19 PM PST by GreyFriar ( 3rd Armored Division - Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

I have no clue as to why Libby's lawyers let this former reporter on the Jury. I bet he writes a book.


116 posted on 03/06/2007 4:23:10 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
I'm sure this guy is now looking forward to a lucrative book deal, endless appearances on MSNBC and wild sex from a variety of grungy women with tattoos, underarm hair and bad breath.


Exactly! Liberal women = Hells Angels with breasts.
117 posted on 03/06/2007 4:23:49 PM PST by Douggles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chesley
Trial by common whizdumb of the media brainwashed.

When this is all over, Libby ought to take the alphabet networks for every dime he can get.

118 posted on 03/06/2007 4:25:44 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Outrageous if true.

Mistrial?


119 posted on 03/06/2007 4:27:31 PM PST by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley

Blinded by their hate. What an article.


120 posted on 03/06/2007 4:28:23 PM PST by gotribe (There's still time to begin a war in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson