Posted on 03/05/2007 3:25:49 PM PST by Mini-14
Mr. Alan Gottlieb, Chairman
Citizens Committee for the
Right to Keep and Bear Arms
12500 N.E. Tenth Place
Bellevue, WA 98005
Dear Alan:
They say that hindsight is always 20-20. In my case, hindsight has been a hard teacher, like the father teaching the son a lesson about life in the wood shed.
I was wrong when I recently suggested that wildlife agencies should ban semiautomatic firearms I erroneously called “assault rifles” for hunting. I insulted legions of my fellow gun owners in the process by calling them “terrorist rifles.” I can never apologize enough for having worn blinders when I should have been wearing bifocals.
But unlike those who would destroy the Second Amendment right to own a firearm – any firearm – I have learned from my embarrassing mistake. My error should not be used, as it has been in recent days by our common enemies, in an effort to dangerously erode our right to keep and bear arms.
I would hope instead to use this spotlight to address my hunting fraternity, many of whom shared my erroneous position. I am a hunter and like many others I had the wrong picture in mind. I associated these firearms with military action, and saw not hunting as I have known it, not the killing of a varmint, but the elimination of the entire colony. Nothing could be further from the truth, but I know from whence it comes. This ridiculous image, formed in the blink of an eye, exerts and unconscious effect on all decisions that follow. In seeking to protect our hunting rights by guarding how we are seen in the public eye, I lost sight of the larger picture; missed the forest for the trees.
My own lack of experience was no excuse for ignoring the fact that millions of Americans – people who would share a campfire or the shelter of their tent, and who have hurt nobody – own, hunt with and competitively shoot or collect the kinds of firearms I so easily dismissed.
I recently took a “crash course” on these firearms with Ted Nugent, to learn more about them and to educate myself. In the process, I learned about the very real threat that faces all American gun owners.
I’ve studied up on legislation now in Congress that would renew and dangerously expand a ban on many types of firearms. The bill, HR 1022 sponsored by New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, is written so broadly that it would outlaw numerous firearms and accessories, including a folding stock for a Ruger rifle. I understand that some of the language could ultimately take away my timeworn and cherished hunting rifles and shotguns as well as those of all American hunters.
The extremist supporters of HR 1022 don’t want to stop criminals. They want to invent new ones out of people like you and me with the simple stroke of a pen. They will do anything they can to make it impossible for more and more American citizens to legally own any firearm.
Realizing that what I wrote catered to this insidious attack on fellow gun owners has, one might say, “awakened a sleeping giant within me, and filled him with a terrible resolve.”
I made a mistake. But those who would use my remarks to further their despicable political agenda have made a bigger one. I hope to become their worst nightmare. I admit I was wrong. They insist they are right.
Enclosed, you will find a check that is intended to be used to fight and defeat HR 1022. I also hope it inspires other gun owners to “do as I do, not as I say.”
I’m putting my money where my mouth should have been, and where my heart and soul have always been. I know the Second Amendment isn’t about hunting and never has been. My blunder was in thinking that by working to protect precious hunting rights I was doing enough. I promise it will never happen again.
I don’t know what lies over the horizon for me. I am not ready for the rocking chair.
I’m going to devote every ounce of my energy to this battle. I will remind my fellow hunters that we are first, gun owners. Whether we like it or not, our former apathy and prejudices may place that which we love, hunting, in jeopardy. I will educate fellow outdoorsmen who mistakenly think like I talked, even if I have to visit every hunting camp and climb into every duck blind and deer stand in this country to get it done. I was wrong, and I’m going to make it right.
Sincerely,
If you know the number....it ain't enough.
Sounds like Zumbo had an epithany and has woke up re liberals and their gun seizing and limiting laws on the books and this proposed monster.
I give this guy a lot of credit for admitting his mistake, and working to rectify it.
I think Dumbo is on the right path.
I believe most anyone with good sense can change, and maybe this will make him a warrior for our rights.
He certainly seems to get it in the letter..Now if he walks the walk.
Color me impressed.
Someone needs a better acronym. Might as well be "Mxyzptlk".
He still advocates from a position of protecting RKBA for "hunters and gun enthusiasts." I'm more interested in firearms for home and self defense. That's the important aspect of RKBA.
Apology accepted.
I'll take Zumbo's word for it.
Be Ever Vigilant!
Still not enough for me. When I see that hes made a list of all the various "Critter Unlimiteds", and is making an effort to preach the Second to those anti-gun Fudds, then I will forgive.
In fact, Im sending him a letter to that effect. Throwing money at a problem and talking about it is the liberal way of doing things, help me in asking him to show that he understands the conservative concern for the Second Amendment...
Never heard of him either, but he has enough of a profile to raise a national ruckus so if he's ready to use that profile for good, then great.
But I agree, he's on probation for a while.
Of course Bush sounded sincere when he said "Campaign Finance Reform" was unconstitutional when he was running for the POTUS and then he signs "Campaign Finance Reform" into law when he gets in office.
Still, lets see what he does.
We believe in redemption, in forgiveness, in correcting mistakes, and in restoration. If not for that, all of us would be sunk.
State constitutions are strange animals, in that they have regulatory functions written in to them, too. In Michigan, the 6% sales tax is part of the state constitution. Does that mean I have a "right" to pay sales tax? Can I choose not to exercise that right?
Game animals, as opposed to vermin, belong to the state government, and the government licenses the right to you to hunt them. "The right to hunt" is not in the Bill of Rights, probably because it was not as fundamental as the right to life itself, free speech, and carrying arms, all of which are vital to free people. "Hunting rights" exist, and are important, but they just don't equate to "inalienable rights" the the US Bill of Rights.
ping for your information
Thanks for the ping Leatherneck_Mt.
I see Zumbo has had time to give the issue some deeper thought.
His letter looks sincere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.