Posted on 03/03/2007 11:14:08 AM PST by Dallas59
DECATUR - David and Eileen Wetzel don't get going in the morning quite as early as they used to.
So David Wetzel, 79, was surprised to hear a knock on the door at their eastside home while he was still getting dressed.
Two men in suits were standing on his porch.
"They showed me their badges and said they were from the Illinois Department of Revenue," Wetzel said. "I said, 'Come in.' Maybe I shouldn't have."
Gary May introduced himself as a special agent. The other man, John Egan, was introduced as his colleague. May gave the Wetzels his card, stating that he is the senior agent in the bureau of criminal investigations.
"I was afraid," Eileen Wetzel said. "I came out of the bathroom. I thought: Good God, we paid our taxes. The check didn't bounce."
The agents informed the Wetzels that they were interested in their car, a 1986 Volkswagen Golf, that David Wetzel converted to run primarily from vegetable oil but also partly on diesel.
Wetzel uses recycled vegetable oil, which he picks up weekly from an organization that uses it for frying food at its dining facility.
"They told me I am required to have a license and am obligated to pay a motor fuel tax," David Wetzel recalled. "Mr. May also told me the tax would be retroactive."
Since the initial visit by the agents on Jan. 4, the Wetzels have been involved in a struggle with the Illinois Department of Revenue. The couple, who live on a fixed budget, have been asked to post a $2,500 bond and threatened with felony charges.
State legislators have rallied to help the Wetzels.
State Sen. Frank Watson, R-Greenville, introduced Senate Bill 267, which would curtail government interference regarding alternative fuels, such as vegetable oil. A public hearing on the bill will be at 1 p.m. today in Room 400 of the state Capitol.
"I would agree that the bond is not acceptable, $2,500 bond," Watson said, adding that David Wetzel should be commended for his innovative efforts. "(His car) gets 46 miles per gallon running on vegetable oil. We all should be thinking about doing without gasoline if we're trying to end foreign dependency.
"I think it's inappropriate of state dollars to send two people to Mr. Wetzel's home to do this. They could have done with a more friendly approach. It could have been done on the phone. To use an intimidation factor on this - who is he harming? Two revenue agents. You'd think there's a better use of their time," Watson said.
The Wetzels, who plan to speak at a Senate hearing in Springfield today, recalled how their struggle with the revenue department unfolded.
According to the Wetzels, May told them during his Jan. 4 visit that they would have to pay taxes at either the gasoline rate of 19½ cents per gallon or the diesel rate of 21½ cents per gallon.
A retired research chemist and food plant manager, Wetzel produced records showing he has used 1,134.6 gallons of vegetable oil from 2002 to 2006. At the higher rate, the tax bill would come to $244.24.
"That averages out to $4.07 a month," Wetzel noted, adding he is willing to pay that bill.
But the Wetzels would discover that the state had more complicated and costly requirements for them to continue to use their "veggie mobile."
David Wetzel was told to contact a revenue official and apply for a license as a "special fuel supplier" and "receiver." After completing a complicated application form designed for businesses, David Wetzel was sent a letter directing him to send in a $2,500 bond.
Eileen Wetzel, a former teaching assistant, calculated that the bond, designed to ensure that their "business" pays its taxes, would cover the next 51 years at their present usage rate.
A couple of weeks later, David Wetzel received another letter from the revenue department, stating that he "must immediately stop operating as a special fuel supplier and receiver until you receive special fuel supplier and receiver licenses."
This threatening letter stated that acting as a supplier and receiver without a license is a Class 3 felony. This class of felonies carries a penalty of up to five years in prison.
On the department of revenue's Web site, David Wetzel discovered that the definition of special fuel supplier includes someone who operates a plant with an "active bulk storage capacity of not less than 30,000 gallons." Wetzel also did not fit the definition of a receiver, described as a person who produces, distributes or transports fuel into the state. So Wetzel withdrew his application to become a supplier and receiver.
Mike Klemens, spokesman for the department of revenue, explained that Wetzel has to register as a supplier because the law states that is the only way he can pay motor fuel tax.
But what if he is not, in fact, a supplier? Then would he instead be exempt from paying the tax?
"We are in the process of creating a way to simplify the registration process and self-assess the tax," Klemens said, adding that a rule change may be in place by spring.
David Wetzel wonders why hybrid cars, which rely on electricity and gasoline, are not taxed for the portion of travel when they are running on electrical power. He said he wants to be treated equally by the law.
David Wetzel, who has been exhibiting his car at energy fairs and universities, views state policies as contradicting stated government aims.
"You hear the president saying we need to reduce our dependence on foreign oil," Wetzel said. "You hear the governor saying that."
State Rep. Bob Flider, D-Mount Zion, also plans to support legislation favoring alternative fuels.
"I'm disappointed that the Illinois Department of Revenue would go after Mr. Wetzel," Flider said. "I don't think it is a situation that merits him being licensed and paying fees.
"The people at the department of revenue apparently feel they need to regulate him in some way. We want to make sure that he is as free as he can be to use vegetable oil. He's an example of ingenuity. Instead of being whacked on the head, he should be encouraged."
Just the tax, mam.
There is also an excise tax on tires for road maintenance.
Jackbooted thugs in dark suits.
Thanks - I never saw that quote before.
Darn smart man.
I would have paid the taxes if they added them -- I was only doing it to get the gas which was not available anywhere else.
Hell, I'll pay this for them to reward them for their innovation... I'm sure the government has paid far more in trying to collect this amount..
Holy Schmoly! This does not bode well for those of us that want to eventually be "off the grid" as far as energy consumption goes.
Smacks of what the Nanny Staters have done to smokers. Run them down, run them underground as much as possible, while still reaping the benefits of tobacco product taxes. And then hunt them down and demand taxes for on-line cigarette purchases, etc.
Fat people are next. I see a tax on food in the future; first fast food, then convenience items, then lastly fresh fruits and veggies. Then those of us that grow our own food and/or have livestock will be forced to turn over our food to the state for distribution amongst the proletariat.
It's insanity!
If this is true, the agents and anybody who directed them or instigated this should have their kneecaps broken.
Not really. Here in Michigan, and I'm sure in other states as well, you can buy fuel for farm use and you don't pay the excise tax for road maintenance on it. But you're not allowed to use it in a road vehicle, only farm vehicles that don't use public roads.
So, if you're allowed to skip the fuel tax if you don't use the fuel on the road, then you should have to pay the tax for fuel you do use on the road, even if you got that fuel from the McDonald's fryer.
There is not enough information in the article to make a positive judgement on what really happened. It can be read that he ran gis golf on veggie oil sometimes and diesel fuel sometimes. It can be read that he used a blend of veggie oil and diesel.
If he blended the two it would appear that the tax was already paid on the diesel. The question then is what does the law actually say? If he says Fuel, he has to pay the tax because that is the law. The blend is running a diesel engine so the state does have a case.
There is a whole other set of laws regulating the use and manufacture of chemicals. He is manufacturing fuel when he blends the fuel and thus becomes subject to laws regulating chemical manufacture. Barring some limits or statutory minimums. he is manufacturing.
It is wise to remember that Illinois is a democrat liberal union state that places the government incharge of all aspects of one's life....including the fuel that gets you from place to place. Lawyers insist on control of every aspect of American life.
Anyone using Green Power should be made to pay tribute to the Goracle, the annointed one.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
There is no state in the Union more Socialist than Illinois.
Like living in the Old Soviet Union.
Nanny State Ping.........
Utter insanity.
It ain't for nothin' that the people who go after illegal whiskey stills in the hills of Kentucky are called "Revenooers."
We used to have a country in which, if there wasn't a law against it, you could do it. We now live in a country where, you can't do it until the government decides whether it wants to regulate it first.
And that is the cutting edge of the statist, totalitarian left.
I'm still trying to wrap my brain around this one - but what a crock.........sheesh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.