Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

For all of those following Red China's phenominal naval buildup, and particularly those who have been following the fate of the former Soviet aircraft carrier Varyag.
1 posted on 03/03/2007 6:36:49 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...

FYI, my latest on the PLAN activities with the Varyag.


2 posted on 03/03/2007 6:37:21 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

They sold it for $20 million?

Maybe the US should have bought it just to keep it out of Chinese hands.


3 posted on 03/03/2007 6:40:56 AM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Great post/pics. Thanks.


5 posted on 03/03/2007 6:51:57 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
Good work Jeff.
6 posted on 03/03/2007 6:53:41 AM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
Alas, it if get into a shooting war it will soon be a target for this:


10 posted on 03/03/2007 6:58:48 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
Some operational questions:

The Russians, the Indians, and now the Chineese are using SU-33s for their carrier operations. I understand that the aircraft, like the F-15 and F-16, has a greater than 1 to 1 thrust ratio, hence the ski ramp and lack of catapult gear.

Landings are arrested, I presume? If so, does that mean that due to the lack of an angled deck that bolters go along the length of the flight deck and back off the ski ramp again?

Does that also mean that fewer aircraft can be carried aboard because the entire length of the flight deck must be cleared of parked aircraft to accomodate bolters?

17 posted on 03/03/2007 7:06:14 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
In 1988, when the Soviet Union dissolved,

It's hard to take the rest of your post on your authority, when the first clause is just flatly wrong. Check your dates.

21 posted on 03/03/2007 7:18:24 AM PST by Alter Kaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Ah so.


24 posted on 03/03/2007 7:21:51 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

What did the Chinese rename the Varyag?


28 posted on 03/03/2007 7:27:11 AM PST by chainsaw (We are going to take things away from you. - H. Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
Although the Chinese are apparently developing the ability to project power, I can't imagine how a navy that can be tracked by satellite and sunk with GPS guided weapons can survive against the United States Navy.

My guess is that, lacking anti-missile defense capability, the flotilla with the longest range missiles would win. I have serious doubts that the Chinese are so equipped, yet. Having been in the radar electronics business and witnessed the transfer of production to Asia, it won't be long before they can make the components, but putting whole systems together is another matter.

30 posted on 03/03/2007 7:30:14 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

For an aggressor, it is most advantageous to concentrate on building up their economy and industrial base first (which they have been busily doing ever since getting permanent Most Favored Nation status)

If you are the one who chooses the time and place to strike, you can defer military spending until it's almost showtime


31 posted on 03/03/2007 7:34:09 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (Never try to teach a pig to sing -- it wastes your time and it annoys the pig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Just FYI, the USSR did not dissolve in 1988. Otherwise interesting reading.


39 posted on 03/03/2007 8:01:59 AM PST by brothers4thID (Hillary: "We are going to take from you.. to provide for the common good")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
Anyone else want to keep an eye on the Varyag? [Google Maps] ^

Also found an interesting site: Varyagworld.com ^

In November 1998, Cheng Zhen Shu, chairman of Chong Lot Travel Agency, has said that Varyag would become a multi-functional entertainment centre, with 600 room hotel, casino, discotheque, restaurants and night-clubs, and has called it Ocean Entertainment Centre.

In May 2005, the Varyag was placed in dry dock and, in early August, it emerged painted in People's Liberation Army Navy gray.

At that time Macau's casino magnate Stanley Ho announced the construction of  Oceanus,  an $800 million entertainment complex in Macau, with 600 room hotel, casino, cinema, retail and apartments, scheduled to open in 2009.

It seems Stanley Ho lost the Varyag in transoceanic subterfuge and decided to have a new one.

Oceanus

Nowadays, presence and mystery of the Varyag is a cost-effective way that cause maximum intimidation against unsinkable aircraft carrier Taiwan.


40 posted on 03/03/2007 8:24:19 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zot; Hurtgen; Interesting Times

Looks like the ChiComs are going for a blue water navy in competition to us. And there weren't anymore enemies after the fall of the Berlin Wall.


45 posted on 03/03/2007 8:54:13 AM PST by GreyFriar ( 3rd Armored Division - Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

bookmark for later printing.


63 posted on 03/03/2007 10:42:44 AM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head; Vicomte13

bttt for surface warfare


68 posted on 03/03/2007 12:41:25 PM PST by investigateworld (Those Border Patrol guys will do more time than the worst Jap POW camp commander, thanks Bush!.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

It will make an excellent reef in the Straits of Taiwan!


91 posted on 03/03/2007 8:06:40 PM PST by Tatze (I'm in a state of taglinelessness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head; SLB
The FoxNews ticker just had that the Chinese government has confirmed that they are increasing their military budget by 17.8% this next year. Since they spent at least $65-billion last year, this is an increase of over $11.5-billion.

That is a lot of new ships, tanks, and planes that will be sporting the red star of China.

102 posted on 03/03/2007 9:49:17 PM PST by Stonewall Jackson (Sir, I protest! I am not a merry man! - Lt. Worf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Unlike in your books, I do not believe we are prepared - financially, infrastructurally, and most importantly, culturally - to lose a few carriers.


116 posted on 03/04/2007 6:17:08 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Thanks for posting such a good thread


134 posted on 03/05/2007 5:09:14 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Charge'em Both Ways)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson