Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: '9/11' May Be The Only Answer Giuliani Needs
The Cable News Network ^ | POSTED: 8:28 p.m. EST, March 1, 2007 | Jeff Greenfield

Posted on 03/02/2007 11:57:07 AM PST by meg88

Rudy Giuliani is going before a big meeting of conservatives this weekend with a remarkable lead in the GOP race; according to a Washington Post poll, he's ahead of Sen. John McCain 44-21.

That raises a question: How could a pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-gun control ex-mayor from New York be doing so well with Republicans?

The short answer is "September 11," but for reasons that go beyond the obvious, which is the sense that Giuliani rallied a stricken city, spoke in bold language about defeating the new enemy and actually was at risk in those moments.

But 9/11 did something else -- it elevated Giuliani far above the level of big-city mayor.

He was the official who "stood up to al Qaeda" and became a major American figure in the global battle against the enemy who'd so savagely attacked the United States. That made him much more than a big city mayor.

Moreover, the attacks radically changed the picture of New York -- the biggest Democratic city in the nation, and one not usually admired by core Republicans.

Two things have changed about New York. First, 9/11 made New York much more "American."

That's where the enemy attacked; that's where the president and the mayor stood with firefighters and American flag to promise payback.

The second factor -- and this is an argument Giuliani hasn't made much, but I'm guessing he will -- is that New York was where a Republican mayor, using conservative ideas on crime, taxes and welfare, turned around the city that was ground zero of modern liberalism.

For whatever reason, New York is much safer, cleaner, healthier city than it was a decade and a half ago, and Giuliani is likely to say, "I don't just talk about ideas like senators. I made them work."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: rudy; rudy2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator

To: areafiftyone
>>>>FROM YOUR LINK JEEZE I WONDER WHY YOU NEGLECTED TO PUT THIS PART IN?

LOL I neglected nothing! MI`s homepage HAD the link posted. You were just too lazy to look hard enough for it. The analysis by MI`s Edmund J. McMahon is the good the bad and the ugly of Rudy`s record. That final closing chapter of Rudy`s fiscal record as mayor of NYCity showed he was no fiscal conservative.

The proof is in the pudding. As Mayor of NYCity, Rudy raised spending by 32% --- double the inflation rate, expanded the city government, and left behind a $2.0 billion deficit, along with doubling the city's debt to $42 billion. And as MI said: "Even with the tax cuts of the last several years, New York remains by far the most heavily taxed big city in the country."

If everyone read ONLY your posts, they'd think it was the second coming of Reagan. Which it is not, btw. Besides, only one in four new jobs back then, can be attributed to those measly tax cuts. The modest cut of $200 million in city income taxes that Giuliani and the City Council agreed to, did little good. Three in four new jobs were directly attributed to the nationwide economic boom of the 1990`s. Which Rudy had NOTHING to do with.

102 posted on 03/02/2007 2:49:22 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kellynch
but I truly just don't get it.

Nope, i guess you don't. You trust your government implicitly. Not everyone does.

103 posted on 03/02/2007 3:20:31 PM PST by Fierce Allegiance (RINO = Rudy Is Not Ours! Keep scrubbing, Rudy supporters, the blood won't come off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

all respects but NY ain't the nation. Nationwide conservatives will doom Rudy only 'cause of


104 posted on 03/02/2007 4:37:57 PM PST by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

every and I mean every media guru is SCARED of Hillary


105 posted on 03/02/2007 4:38:51 PM PST by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
War?

Borders?

Invasion?

2nd Amendment?

Lax immigration enforcement???

Terrorist student visas?

National security?

RINO = Redeploy Immigration & Naturalization Officers.

You need to get serious...

106 posted on 03/02/2007 5:02:06 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Your FR screen name, as I have pointed out to you previously, is a disservice to the man its supposed to revere - because Ronald Reagan NEVER said the kinds of VILE things you have been throwing around lately about ANYONE.

Partly because he was a nice guy (which you are not), and partly because he was a Christian who "WALKED THE WALK', while most alleged Christians merely 'talk the talk'.

You could be a Buddhist, but the lesson is the same.

You do not deserve to have the name "Reagan" in your nic because you soil it with every post.

As I suggested previously, "The Mad Monk" is still open out there...and more descriptive...

107 posted on 03/02/2007 6:10:29 PM PST by Al Simmons (Why Rudy in 2008? Because National Security should not be left to children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Guiliani did turn New York around was good for the city of New York. But American is not New York. We need a president who is fiscally as well as socially conservative.


108 posted on 03/02/2007 6:15:04 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey; captainswife
Just calling a spade a spade. Invading Iraq may or may not have been a bad idea, but invading it without a realistic plan for WHAT COMES AFTERWARDS was a VERY BAD IDEA.

Yeah, I was in the front of the warmongers who wanted Saddam out of there - after Afghanistan we all got a little too greedy, I think.

Had I known that we had no plan for 'what happens afterwards', and had I believed Gen Shinseki instead of dismissing him as a Clinton shill along with the other Koolaiddrinkers around here, I would not have been in favor.

On balance, I still like Dubuya and certainly (I pray - for the sake of the nation) future events will hopefully lead history to treat him more kindly than present polls indicate.

But he was sold a bill of goods on Iraq, and stuck by the people who recommended the wrong strategy way too long.

It PAINS me to admit this, but its a FACT.

Now I pray we can get the Iraqi army to a decent state before we pull out...but I have my doubts there...we have unintentionally strengthened Iran's hand in the region with our failure in Iraq. A costly mistake.

109 posted on 03/02/2007 6:24:37 PM PST by Al Simmons (Why Rudy in 2008? Because National Security should not be left to children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
I understand your frustration, but don't be angry with me. You chose Al Simmons as your screen name. A really dumb move.

I chose a screenname that honors a great conservative icon. If you're a conservative and you believe its important to advance conservatism on the internets premier conservative website, then it only makes sense to take a screenname that is appropriate for that venue. One that represents what conservatism is all about. Think I'll keep my handle. I hope it continues to drive you liberals bonkers.

Maybe you could ask JimRob to change your screenname to "Giuliani Man", or maybe a more generic handle would work better for you. Say, "Liberal Man".

110 posted on 03/02/2007 7:17:27 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: meg88; All
It will be either Rudy or Romney getting the nomination. The others are all running for VP.

For my money, it was Rudy, more than Bush, who rallied the country after 9-11. Bush represented the government response; Rudy represented the public reaction. He was able to get and keep a connection with the people that Bush lost with the mismanagement of the Iraq war.

I see Rudy has having the potential to be this era's Teddy Roosevelt-another "Outsider" who was a reformer and a man of ideas, not just ideology. And isn't that what conservatism is supposed to be about?

111 posted on 03/02/2007 7:38:14 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel-Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

lunge??? that is so laughable. ....Mitt is at 4$ he has no where to go but down....McCain will too as he's jumping on the mud bandwagon with Mitt


112 posted on 03/02/2007 8:19:13 PM PST by texicali (those that can do! Rudy does in spades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I have spoken to many NYFD and NYPD post 9/11 and they tell me a very different story than the one you are trying to portray....they respect him and admire him as he went to all the funerals of those who died....walked brides down the aisle...officiated at wedding ceremonies and many other things he was asked to do by the families of those great fire and police officers and their families....


113 posted on 03/02/2007 8:30:23 PM PST by texicali (those that can do! Rudy does in spades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
*LOL* Well, I hardly expected my post to elicit just about the only polite reply I've seen from you - Touche!

(You've learned from our last exchange, no?)

I AM a liberal - in the classical sense, of course.

And I think I'll keep my nic. It'll keep me squarely in your sights. ;>)

114 posted on 03/02/2007 8:32:10 PM PST by Al Simmons (Why Rudy in 2008? Because National Security should not be left to children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

that is NOT Ray Nagin....he hid in they Hyatt and did nothing but whine...I have family that lives there and in MS and they are all ashamed of him


115 posted on 03/02/2007 8:40:40 PM PST by texicali (those that can do! Rudy does in spades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Still rooting for McCain I see .. ROTFLOL!! Poor things!


116 posted on 03/02/2007 8:42:15 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
When you're not playing cheerleader for Rudy, you're playing the part of the victim. You want people to feel your joy and your pain. What a whiner! LOL

Bottom line. Nothing has changed from what I told about a week or so ago. Liberals are the enemy of conservatism. Around FR, supporting Rudy Giuliani is a form of political treason. Like it or not, its a betrayal of conservatism. You'd be better served to keep your sights on that fact, mister Rudybot. Political debate is not your forte. ;^)
117 posted on 03/02/2007 9:44:19 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

*YAWN*


118 posted on 03/02/2007 9:54:41 PM PST by Al Simmons (Why Rudy in 2008? Because National Security should not be left to children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons

Looks like its way past your debate-time.


119 posted on 03/02/2007 9:56:41 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: texicali
I have spoken to many NYFD and NYPD post 9/11 and they tell me a very different story than the one you are trying to portray....they respect him and admire him as he went to all the funerals of those who died....walked brides down the aisle...officiated at wedding ceremonies and many other things he was asked to do by the families of those great fire and police officers and their families....>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I agree with what you say about Giulianis cultural qualities. I am sure he is a fine man. His politics and record stink.

However , Giuliani is creating an image, and has spent millions on it. He has done this so as to obtain political power from an electorate. I am Giulianis political enemy. He is a liberal, I am a conservative. I will produce facts to show that he is a liberal. I will tear him down as a liberal. You Rudy Rooters seem to think that we conservative Republicans need to lie down and not join issue with Rudy's record, and his previous images, created by Rudy to acqquire votes which will work against conservative interests after Rudy is elected.

I guess you think we should all just lay down as conservatives and let the Rudy Machine just roll over us?

Ain't gonna happen. Whatever King making is going on with Rudy as the MSM darling, we will defeat it. Our place is to generate grass roots support for a conservative candidate, that will overcome men like Rudy. And we mean to be about our business.

Now, lead, follow, or get out of the way.

120 posted on 03/03/2007 6:52:01 AM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson