Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: '9/11' May Be The Only Answer Giuliani Needs
The Cable News Network ^ | POSTED: 8:28 p.m. EST, March 1, 2007 | Jeff Greenfield

Posted on 03/02/2007 11:57:07 AM PST by meg88

Rudy Giuliani is going before a big meeting of conservatives this weekend with a remarkable lead in the GOP race; according to a Washington Post poll, he's ahead of Sen. John McCain 44-21.

That raises a question: How could a pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-gun control ex-mayor from New York be doing so well with Republicans?

The short answer is "September 11," but for reasons that go beyond the obvious, which is the sense that Giuliani rallied a stricken city, spoke in bold language about defeating the new enemy and actually was at risk in those moments.

But 9/11 did something else -- it elevated Giuliani far above the level of big-city mayor.

He was the official who "stood up to al Qaeda" and became a major American figure in the global battle against the enemy who'd so savagely attacked the United States. That made him much more than a big city mayor.

Moreover, the attacks radically changed the picture of New York -- the biggest Democratic city in the nation, and one not usually admired by core Republicans.

Two things have changed about New York. First, 9/11 made New York much more "American."

That's where the enemy attacked; that's where the president and the mayor stood with firefighters and American flag to promise payback.

The second factor -- and this is an argument Giuliani hasn't made much, but I'm guessing he will -- is that New York was where a Republican mayor, using conservative ideas on crime, taxes and welfare, turned around the city that was ground zero of modern liberalism.

For whatever reason, New York is much safer, cleaner, healthier city than it was a decade and a half ago, and Giuliani is likely to say, "I don't just talk about ideas like senators. I made them work."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: rudy; rudy2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: kellynch
And, to this day, there are people here in NY who hate his guts because "he's a fascist/Nazi."

His anti-constitutional stance on guns makes their feelings justified, I'd say.

81 posted on 03/02/2007 1:15:48 PM PST by Fierce Allegiance (RINO = Rudy Is Not Ours! Keep scrubbing, Rudy supporters, the blood won't come off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Did you see his speech at CPAC today?


82 posted on 03/02/2007 1:16:49 PM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: auto power

Must suck being such a thin skinned sissy. Wah.


83 posted on 03/02/2007 1:16:51 PM PST by Fierce Allegiance (RINO = Rudy Is Not Ours! Keep scrubbing, Rudy supporters, the blood won't come off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
Hey fighting in the vietnam war, while honorable, does not give one experience fighting modern day islamo terrorism either. Unfortunately no one other than Bush has "experience" fighting the WOT. I'm sure Hunter would be great, I'd be happy to support him but in the likely event that he won't be around to be a choice come Nov '08 you can bet if it's Rudy vs Hillary, Obama, The Breck Girl or any of the other socialists running I will take my chances with Rudy.

The I'm gonna take my ball and go home voters rarely get what they want and in the end we end up with nothing. And please spare me with the Rudy's just the same (not necessarily you) he's not for socialized healthcare, redistribution of wealth, higher taxes to pay for more handouts, surrendering to the Islamopignazis and hoping they will treat us nice......and the list could go on.

84 posted on 03/02/2007 1:27:31 PM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: marlon

"And please spare me with the Rudy's just the same (not necessarily you) he's not for socialized healthcare, redistribution of wealth, higher taxes to pay for more handouts, surrendering to the Islamopignazis and hoping they will treat us nice......"

no, he's for:

1. Gun control
2. campaign finance reform laws
3. Hate crime laws
4. Harboring illegal aliens in violation of federal law (NY sanctuary city)
5. Roe v wade as "good constitutional law".
BTW, he also supports government fundng for abortions, so I'm not sure how that fits in with the limited government label

Then he has his problems with the first amendment- numerous lawsuits he lost as mayor of NYC on first amendment grounds, including the one against NY magazine (look it up to see how thin skinned rudy is)


85 posted on 03/02/2007 1:31:53 PM PST by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! And watch Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Name recognition.



He was the Mayor of one of America's largest cities, thrust suddenly into a nightmarish situation only few could have imagined. Unwelcome limelight suddenly cast upon him from an event no civilized people would wish upon anyone. Thousands of his fellow citizens suddenly displaced, their lives forever torn apart. Frantic calls for help from all over the city, seemingly unending. Death and destruction on a scale only imaginable in one's worst nightmares. Untold property damage from which his fair city could never fully recuperate. His world, his city, permanently scarred in an event forever indelibly written upon the annals of America's history.

Yet, the "Big R" stood in the trenches, squared his shoulders, looked danger in the eye, and met the challenge that lay before him as well as his frail human form would allow.

















His name is Ray Nagin....

GOTCHA! LOL!!!
And you thought it was Rudy!


86 posted on 03/02/2007 1:34:32 PM PST by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: meg88
If the Republicans nominate Giuliani, they get to define the principle issue in the 2008 election. Being able to define an election's issue is a huge boost to any political campaign.

If Giuliani is the candidate, then the principle issue in the 2008 election is the War on Terror.

If the principle issue in the 2008 election is the War on Terror, the Republicans win, and win big.

QED.

87 posted on 03/02/2007 1:36:39 PM PST by Mr J (All IMHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

To: Fierce Allegiance
I have to know. What is it about guns that drives people's votes? I have shot guns, but in a controlled environment (at various NYPD shooting ranges). My father grew up in a rural part of the country and learned to hunt, but he has no desire to have a gun now. Why does the average person feel compelled to own a gun? OK, the Constitution says I can have one, but that doesn't mean I "need" to have one.

We need a license to get married. We need a license to drive. We need a license to have a dog. What's so awful about a license and some training to own a gun?

Perhaps it's because I grew up in and around New York City, but I truly just don't get it.

89 posted on 03/02/2007 1:52:48 PM PST by kellynch ("Our only freedom is the freedom to discipline ourselves." -- Bernard Baruch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: advertising guy
"always beware when the media picks the republican nominee

They know a dem beats Rudy cause many will sit on their hands and not vote for a liberal like Rudy."

The press has a "liberal enough" view of Rudy. Even they are tired of Hillary. Bill was a fun guy, but they were not and are not a fun couple. I think the press thinks Rudy would be entertaining in Washington, while Hillary would be a combination of your mother in law plus a preacher--4 years of moralizing boredom......

91 posted on 03/02/2007 1:58:15 PM PST by cookcounty (How odd. Lee Hamilton now employed by Sandy Berger: stonebridge-international.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

IIRC that was before anyone had an opportunity to see how badly the funds have been mismanaged.


92 posted on 03/02/2007 1:58:49 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
IIRC that was before anyone had an opportunity to see how badly the funds have been mismanaged.

That was less than five months after 9-11.

And it is telling that Giuliani was forced to impose safeguards and reduce fees for the deal to be allowed.

93 posted on 03/02/2007 2:00:13 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: kellynch
Why does the average person feel compelled to own a gun? OK, the Constitution says I can have one, but that doesn't mean I "need" to have one.

You are asking this in a fair manner and I will reply in kind.

Guns serve at least three vital purposes:

Self defense

Community defense

And as a bulwhark against government tyranny.

Self-defense should be obvious. You don't need to shoot someone to defend yourself with a gun. Making a perp aware that you are armed suffices 95 percent of the time or more. And instead of the cops responding to 9-11 to find you as a victim, they can respond to 9-11 to pick up the perp.

Community defense should be obvious. Imagine if the pilots or a couple of passengers had been armed during 9-11. It would not have happened. Likewise, look how people defended their neighborhoods with guns after Andrew and during the Rodney King riots.

And government tyranny is both the least likely and most vital reason for gun ownership. It is least likely precisely because we as a country are armed to the teeth and would put up a HELL of a fight against a usurping tyrant. Unless, of course, he convinces us to give up our guns for our own good and safety without a fight.

We need a license to get married. We need a license to drive. We need a license to have a dog. What's so awful about a license and some training to own a gun?

Registration often leads to confiscation. That is the problem.

94 posted on 03/02/2007 2:05:42 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: meg88; adam_az; airborne; Alberta's Child; Arizona Carolyn; Arthur Wildfire! March; ...

Looks like the Rudybots are on the ropes for sure.


Drooling over an article by the South Whidbey Wack-job is the only way they can feel good about their reprobate candidate.


95 posted on 03/02/2007 2:21:13 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Be sure to watch Duncan Hunter on C-Span tonight at 8 PM!


96 posted on 03/02/2007 2:23:16 PM PST by airborne (Elect an Airborne Ranger,Vietnam Veteran for President ! Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Antique Gal; flashbunny
"I think it comes down to ,who do you tust to fight radical Islam with more conviction."

Yep! Rudy can't do anything with conviction; that is the essence of the problem. He has always been as solid as a weather vane.

97 posted on 03/02/2007 2:24:53 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Could you remove me from your ping list? I'm not sure how I got on in the first place.


98 posted on 03/02/2007 2:29:14 PM PST by Hoodlum91 (I support global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Al Simmons
b. He screwed up in Iraq.

Wow, Al. I may disagree with your choice of candidates, but you've certainly earned my respect with that remark.

99 posted on 03/02/2007 2:36:33 PM PST by Doohickey (I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Providing a hot link:

Rudy's shot at the Big Dip

100 posted on 03/02/2007 2:38:32 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson