More info here
Posted on 02/27/2007 1:09:06 PM PST by Froufrou
An advocacy group that once lobbied for mandatory nutrition labels for groceries has set it sights on restaurant chains and is asking the federal government to require large chains to offer calorie, fat and sodium information on menus.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest on Monday criticized several food chains for promoting what the group calls "x-treme eating" with dishes that include more calories and fat than most people should eat in one day.
The government recommends that the average American consume around 2,000 calories per day, with less than 10 percent of the calories coming from saturated fat.
A "colossal burger" at Ruby Tuesday contains 1,940 calories and 141 grams of fat. One serving of an appetizer at Uno Chicago Grill called "pizza skins" contains 1,030 calories and 67 grams of fat; the pizza skins dish contains two servings, bringing the total to more than 2,000 calories and 134 grams of fat.
Nutritional information for many chain restaurants - including Ruby Tuesday and Uno - is available on the companies' websites, but CSPI wants the information right on the menus. The group says that after years of lobbying the restaurants to offer the information voluntarily, it is resorting to government force.
CSPI has already convinced lawmakers in 19 states and cities to introduce legislation that would require nutrition labels on menus in restaurants with more than 10 locations around the country. It would apply to restaurants from Ruth's Chris Steakhouse and the Palm to McDonald's and Starbucks.
New York City in December became the first city to pass the law. A federal version of the Menu Education and Labeling (MEAL) Act was introduced in both houses of the U.S. Congress last year but never came to either floor for a vote.
"The food police are not going to take this away from you," CSPI executive director Michael Jacobson said during a news conference in Washington, D.C., Monday.
"The restaurants have every right to make these foods, and you have every right to eat them, but I think at the very least, these restaurants should give consumers the information that would enable them to make decent eating choices," he added.
Margo Wootan, director of nutrition policy for CSPI, said diners often don't realize how many calories they are consuming during a meal at a restaurant. "Without nutrition information it's difficult to compare options and to make informed choices," she said.
"Studies link eating out with higher caloric intake and an increase in rates of obesity," she said. "It's very easy to eat a whole day's worth of calories at a single sitting at a restaurant."
J. Justin Wilson, a spokesman for the restaurant industry-funded Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF), said "it doesn't take a warning label for someone to know that something covered with cheese and bacon is not a health option."
Wilson showed up at CSPI's news conference to hand out cookies from Potbelly Sandwich Works with tongue-in-cheek warning labels saying the cookie "contains lots of calories, plenty of fat, and tons of yumminess."
"Including calorie information on menus will not make Americans healthier," Wilson argued. "Give consumers some credit. They already know the difference between a banana and a banana split, or a milkshake and a diet soda."
Wilson said that "almost every menu out there has a healthy option" and that "sometimes people just want a hamburger."
He said including nutrition information on obviously unhealthy food will add "a heaping pile of guilt along with their dinner if they decide to treat themselves."
Frigging busybodies!
So, he ADMITS they ARE the food POLICE!!!!!!!!.........
Whose business is it what I eat, how often, where and when? Are any of those busybodies offering to pay my rent? My health insurance? My grocery bills? If not, they need to stay the eff out of my face and let me eat what I darn well please....
You didn't really expect that the health nazis would stop with cigarettes, did you?
Why is the federal government regulating local resturants? The fed's need to tell them about this thing called the 10th Amendment and that's not the feds job.
Center for Science in the Public Interest -- aka -- Center for People With Too Much Time on Their Hands
"Double bypass burger!"
I heard that Ruby Tuesday is one of the worst for fat and calories...and I never even got to try one! Wah!
Not that I'm saying that we need a law, but if the government requires nutritional facts to be printed on prepacked foods, why doesn't it require restaurants to disclose nutritional facts on prepared foods? Again--not that I'm saying we need a law--but some consistency would be nice.
When I go out to eat, I usually like to check online to see the nutritional value of the food that I eat, and I find it super annoying when the information isn't posted. Quizno's, for instance, is notorious for keep the nutritional information of its food secret, probably because the food is outrageously bad for you. It would be nice if the restaurants stepped up and put all this information online.
Do these people wake up each day and think "Time to save all the stupid people from themselves, aren't I great?!" or "Time to stick my nose in everyone else's business?"
Not yet... except for...
WARNING: Consumption of this food may cause weight gain and cause you to use up your carbon credits.
Their email address is: cspi@cspinet.org
when I want to eat healthy I eat at home, when I don't I go out..DAM* these people take all the fun out of living...
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Is it wrong to enjoy a hearty steak with a mountain of mashed potatos, smothered in butter?
Whose business is it what I eat,..
****
True, it is nobodies business.
But when we have universal health care, it will be everybody's business. Coming soon to a country near you!
...and if I really want to know what's in a restaurant's food, 9 times out of 10 I can look it up online.
But I don't!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.