Posted on 02/27/2007 8:30:38 AM PST by Reagan Fellow
The U.S. Department of Education released 12th grade NAEP scores last week and the results are discouraging.
Reading scores of 12th grade students have declined significantly since 1992. The percentage of high school seniors scoring below basic in reading increased from 20 to 27 percent between 1992 and 2005. During the same period, high school seniors scoring proficient in reading dropped 14 percent.
Separately, the Department released a study showing that since 1990, high school grade point averages are up across the country. Also, the percentage of students taking college-prep classes climbed from 40 to 68 percent. In addition, 12th graders in 2005 averaged 360 more hours of classroom instruction than their 1990 counterparts.
Despite all of that, the Class of 2005 performed worse on the NAEP than students in the early 90s. Id like to remind you that Bill and Ted were students during that time
Although the Department of Education did not mention it, inflation adjusted per pupil spending increased more than 20 percent between 1990 and 2002. It has increased even further since then.
As another famous Bill once said, its time for a change.
Thanks for that Youtube link. What a horror. Did we learn nothing from the New Match debacle? Is there something wrong with teaching the simplest, most direct way of problem solving? Is that what PoMo math looks like? The incredible thing is that test scores haven't gone through the floor. At best, we're creating a generation of math-phobes.
When GPA is up and test scores are down, it means more parents are doing their childrens homework for them. But unfortunately, they can take the test for them.
Maybe Businesses can sue the schools for turning out poor quality employees. A Sector could agree to a set of standards all employees must meet for their given discipline. Instead of firing employees for poor performance, maybe they could sue the colleges and universities for a loss of productivity etc. Then fire the poor performing employee, and that ex-employee in turn sues the same school for creating the problem.
ping
It was of my Dad and the MP's he commanded that were assigned to SHAEF.
My step-granddaughter saw it and asked what it was. As she is an 11th grade student I figured she would not know the term SHAEF, so I explained that it was my Dad and all the MP's assigned to Eisenhower's command in World War II.
Her reply: "Who was Eisenhower?"
In addition to her grammar, we are now also working on her knowledge of American History.
Hmmm...anyone here familiar with the concept of grade inflation? Nah, teachers would NEVER do that.../sarc
If you don't like testing, then come up with an alternative. Just letting the teachers go on the way they are is not an acceptable alternative.
When a system is failing year in and year out to produce what it promises and when it's only proposed fix is "give us more money," then the rubes putting up the money have the right, no, the duty, to question the experts who aren't delivering results. Testing is one obvious, maybe not the best, way to start trying to figure out what is broken.
And Education is broken in this country. As long as we keep shoveling money down the hole, the educators have no apparent interest in making the system any better, except to increase the number of teachers in the union and what they get paid. The teachers and the administrators ARE the problem.
I personally would shut down every public school, ban anyone who has taught there from being employed again as a teacher in the new system, and ban anyone with an education degree from being a teacher in the new system. Vouchers for everyone and let the chips fall where they may. There would be a few years of chaos and then we would have an education system that outperforms the current one at half the cost.
Because it's harder to get standardized tests to lie about how much kids have been taught.
Worse--if you give Johnny or Jane a bad grade, they'll feel bad and mommy and daddy will have to come defend their underachieving little booger-eaters.
Agreed. The math curricula I've seen have been really wretched. My kids happen to have good math teachers at present, which is their only saving grace.
MONEY is required for THOSE "educational fads"....
Ah, I see. So something that's demonstrably unhelpful must remain in place until I come up with the alternative?
How ... stupid. And how very like the educational problem you purport to want to fix.
The alternative is actually very straightforward.
First, require teachers to get a real college degree, rather than an "education" degree. Then require a teaching certificate, which would consist of an additional year of classes which comprise the small set of classes which are actually useful.
"Specialty" teachers can take additional classes, and get additional certification.
THEN ... get good curricula, the characteristics of which are known, because they've passed the test of time.
THEN -- and only then -- does "testing" make sense, but only as an instructional tool, and not some idiocy designed to promote "competition" between schools.
The trouble with that is that it'll clog the courts and encourage the lawyers.
The REAL problem is that an education is not really prized. Oh, everybody knows that more education = more $$$ in a vague sense, but in fact, especially in minority communities, education is seen as "acting white" and is shunned.
A kid should be responsible for his own education after a certain point, but if all your friends discourage you, are you gonna get new friends, or go along?
Not doing a very good job of teaching to tests are they?
Maybe there are too many tests. When I was in HS in NYC [a long time ago], the State Board gave 'Regents' tests which the teachers taught to and did a very good job. Tests were in English, History and Economics. Diplomas were with or without Regents credit. I believe this single test helped teachers, students, and schools.
Tests provide measure in health, sports or learning. Tests are for admission to professions. Knowing the 'score' is how the game is played.
It depends on the school, of course.
If "they" happen to be a school filled with well-off kids from two-parent families, they generally do great on the tests.
And if "they" happen to be a school filled with poor kids from a place near the street named for MLK, they'll almost always do poorly.
Testing can't deal with that kind of difference.
You are correct and indeed that is what is happening now. Many colleges are requiring subject areas for middle and high school teachers. The hold-outs are the elementary education majors. The trend now is to earn a degree in a subject area, then the masters in education, spend a semester student teaching, complete comps and/or thesis and ready to rock and roll in the real world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.