Posted on 02/26/2007 3:09:26 PM PST by ConservativeStatement
February 26, 2007 -- Giants star Amani Toomer is splitting with his wife, claiming she not only reneged on a pact to have kids with the veteran wide receiver but went so far as to abort four pregnancies, according to bombshell court papers.
Toomer has sued to annul his marriage to Dr. Yola Dabrowski, who won't get a dime if a judge upholds Toomer's argument that she committed "fraud" when they wed. She is seeking a divorce.
The divorce trial is set to begin tomorrow in Hudson County, N.J., Family Court.
Toomer, 32, alleges his wife refused to have the "big family" they had discussed before getting hitched in a Las Vegas civil ceremony in October 2002.
"This false promise was never delivered," he charges in documents filed in court.
Instead, Dabrowski "had up to four" abortions "against Toomer's wishes [and] without his consent," the Giant claims.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
LOL! That was my first thought, too. "Doctor" of - er, what?
Pitty the fool who has to go see a dr who has yet to figure out how to prevent a pregnancy! sheesh! ROFLMAO!
That's the wrong Yola Dobrowski. From a ceramics site...the real one is the skinny flakey blonde....who murdered four of her own children.
I cannot imagine how betrayed he must feel.
I didn't say that it did - just that it would meet even that standard, OK? But, if it makes you feel better to think you've somehow corrected me, go ahead and feel better. It's "on the house".
I used to have a co-worker who told me she had an abortion years prior and she followed it up by saying "Try to find a woman who hasn't had an abortion. If she tells you she hasn't had one, she is a liar."
Read the whole article. The accusations by both parties are entertaining
Didn't mean to offend you. It seems to be common around here for people to post without reading the original article, and I just wanted to correct any mis-conception by anybody that the "civil" annulment being sought by the husband had anything to do with "religious" annulments that are granted by the Catholic Church.
Even the Catholic Church requires that a couple secure a legal DIVORCE before seeking a religious annulment. The regulations are quite clear about that, but many people do not understand that (particularly non-Catholics).
And a good mistress to another liberal and a good fling for a few other liberals.
Motivation.
I understand. I shouldn't have let rip like that. I am a Catholic (who has a annulment) and know the standards so my point was just what I said about this guy, if his story is true, being completely in the right.
Hell, it's his baby too. Shouldn't he have a "choice"?
Marrying one of those would be worse than being stuck on an elevator with a Jehovah's Witness that sells Amway.
There is no way to know who's right here, aside from the four abortions (if they happened), which are disgusting. What is clear is that one should have divorced the other long ago. One suspects this pretty woman stayed with Mr. Toomer because she liked the money ... and/or bedroom "prowess," even though it's sometimes unwelcome.
"..Dabrowski, who has been granted $11,000 a month in temporary support, wants permanent alimony and half the couple's marital assets.."
I hate to be crass, but for what? She has no prospects? She can't get married again?
Probably not for that kind of money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.