Skip to comments.
Gay Republicans seek recognition (Rudy Mentioned)
CNN ^
| 8/1999
| Maria Hinojosa
Posted on 02/26/2007 1:47:12 PM PST by pissant
NEW YORK (CNN) -- These days, it seems as if it is good politics for conservatives to address the annual convention of gay Republicans.
"Keep pushing the Republican Party because you're pushing it in the right direction," New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani told the Log Cabin Republican convention over the weekend.
That is a far cry from the 1992 Republican convention, when the party's far right wing attacked the gay community.
"Bill Clinton and Al Gore represent the most pro-lesbian and pro-gay ticket in history," said Pat Buchanan at the 1992 GOP convention.
The convention crowds responded with enthusiasm. But now, some Republican candidates are taking a less confrontational approach.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: desperate; gaystapo; giuliani; homosexualagenda; lcr; logcabin; mariahinojosa; marriage; paleosmearjob; rino; rinos; rudy; rudy2008; rudygiuliani; smear; turdburglers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-169 next last
To: pissant
How did he go nuts? He never waiverd on defense or taxes, it's just that issues that were not even on the radar when he ran and thus were not talked about became more prevalent as he got older and his opinions got out.
81
posted on
02/26/2007 3:02:09 PM PST
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: MinnesotaLibertarian
They must be all nuts like that nutty Goldwater LOL.
82
posted on
02/26/2007 3:02:55 PM PST
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: spikeytx86
He may not of advertised it, but he was always pro-choice. It never really would have came up (gay issues and abortion) when he was running for president so know one really knew. He represented the Liberterian leaning west to a T and am proud to belong to the party he served. In other words, you also think abortion is just fine. So why are you here wasting our time on FreeRepublic?
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.
Do you figure you'll change this site right after you get through wiping the pro-life plank out of the GOP platform?
83
posted on
02/26/2007 3:03:59 PM PST
by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: madprof98
In other words, you also think abortion is just fine. So why are you here wasting our time on FreeRepublic?
One has to hate Goldwater to be a conservative? My, my, times have sure changed.
84
posted on
02/26/2007 3:05:40 PM PST
by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: MinnesotaLibertarian
27 states now have bans. Arizona did buck the trend, 51 to 49%, probably because McCain was in favor of it.
The composite percentages in 2004 and 2006 were 67-33, and 61-39%, respectively. That's called a landslide in my book.
85
posted on
02/26/2007 3:06:15 PM PST
by
pissant
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: madprof98
LOL, so If I am a proud Goldwater Republican that makes me for abortion? I dont agree 100% with his views, and I bet he would probably support the matter going back to the states. I think he was flat wrong on the matter of Abortion.
But 9 out of 10 ain't bad.
86
posted on
02/26/2007 3:07:24 PM PST
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: spikeytx86
He started sounding like a liberal and bad mouthing the right of his party. Considering he used to be on that right, I figured he was nuts. In hindsight Reagan makes Goldwater look very small.
87
posted on
02/26/2007 3:08:17 PM PST
by
pissant
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: Sunsong
I think they really are, literally, suicide for the GOP. The GOP has put itself where it's reliant on a chunk of voters who constantly threaten not to show up to polls if every one of their demands is not met - positions which alienate the majority of other voters. In this last election, the GOP did very poorly among independents, and there was poor turnout among their supposed "base", because they pouted and stayed home.
To: pissant
Well we will never know what Goldwater would have accomplished as President so we can't really compare but you will get no argument from me about Reagan. People still fight to this day to fill those ginormous boots. No one ever will, he was one in a trillion and I wish everyday he was still here to guide the party.
89
posted on
02/26/2007 3:10:53 PM PST
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: pissant
He started sounding like a liberal and bad mouthing the right of his party.
The social conservatives can hardly be seen as the 'right' of the party. As far as I know, Goldwater did not change, the party changed. As early as the 70's, Goldwater refused to support the HUman Life Amendment, though he was opposed to abortion-on-demnad.
90
posted on
02/26/2007 3:11:16 PM PST
by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: pissant
He badmouthed the Religious Right, and not the right wing as a whole. Can you show me where he ever badmouthed anyone for being too strong on defense or taxes or shrinking government.
91
posted on
02/26/2007 3:12:09 PM PST
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: pissant
And that same social conservative wing of the party is also the side of the party that is now called "Big Government Conservatives". Many are at ease with the welfare state.
92
posted on
02/26/2007 3:13:56 PM PST
by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: pissant
Well--so Rudy wants to 'push' (no pun intended) the Party in THEIR direction?
I guess that makes sense actually. The Rudy-apologists here keep telling us that we (the traditional conservative base) are no longer needed. Yep, replacing us with 'liberals, independents, and more gays' is definitely the direction that the Republican Party needs to move. /s
I hope the Rudy-apologists enjoy their NEW PARTY--I wish them well.
93
posted on
02/26/2007 3:14:56 PM PST
by
stockstrader
("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
To: pissant
"Look waht's happening in the UK, Europe and Canada. Coming to a state near you."
Except that we have this one little advantage over the UK, the rest of Europe, and Canada. It's called the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. How, exactly, would one force churches to perform gay marriage without repealing the First Amendment? Even today, churches cannot be forced to perform interracial marriages (and there are a few that refuse to do so).
94
posted on
02/26/2007 3:15:17 PM PST
by
Kahonek
To: LtdGovt
Goldwater supported Reagan, and was very keen to have been part of that 1980 revolution, the year when conservative Christians broke for the GOP.
95
posted on
02/26/2007 3:15:52 PM PST
by
pissant
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: pissant
Actually, Goldwater did not care for Reagan, mostly because of his associations with the Christian Right.
To: MinnesotaLibertarian
The GOP has put itself where it's reliant on a chunk of voters who constantly threaten not to show up to polls if every one of their demands is not met - positions which alienate the majority of other voters. Nasty old theocrats! Kill them!
97
posted on
02/26/2007 3:17:31 PM PST
by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: MinnesotaLibertarian
Not true. At least early on.
98
posted on
02/26/2007 3:17:58 PM PST
by
pissant
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: spikeytx86
Was it the religious right, or the military right that fought Clinton off on the gays in the military. You tell me.
99
posted on
02/26/2007 3:19:11 PM PST
by
pissant
(http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: pissant
Gay Republicans should be forced into the closet, the door locked and all their cries for liberation ignored. :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson