Posted on 02/25/2007 4:25:46 PM PST by Winged Hussar
You can neutralize the rest of your pollutionthrough offsets. When you buy offsets, you essentially pay someone to reduce or remove global warming pollution in your name.
For example, when you buy 10 tons of carbon offsets, the seller guarantees that 10 fewer tons of global warming pollution go into the atmosphere. While the pollution you produce yourself is the same, you get the credit for that 10-ton reduction.
(Excerpt) Read more at fightglobalwarming.com ...
How do they keep 'score' of how many 'carbon credits' one uses?!!! These people are IDIOTS!
I heard a talking head Democrat say that Al Gore has 'bought' carbon credits so it's okay if he flys around the country in a private jet and owns several homes. They must think people are as stupid as they are!
One of the 'leaders' of this 'movement' in the United States is from CANADA?!!!
*******
For a list of Gold Standard vendors, please see the Resources section under "Gold Standard Vendors".
Brief Biography
David T. Suzuki PhD, Chair of the David Suzuki Foundation, is an award-winning scientist, environmentalist and broadcaster.
David has received consistently high acclaim for his 30 years of award-winning work in broadcasting, explaining the complexities of science in a compelling, easily understood way. He is well known to millions as the host of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's popular science television series, The Nature of Things.
His eight part series, A Planet for the Taking won an award from the United Nations. His eight-part PBS series The Secret of Life was praised internationally, as was his five-part series The Brain for the Discovery Channel. For CBC Radio he founded the long running radio series, Quirks and Quarks and has presented two influential documentary series on the environment, From Naked Ape to Superspecies and It's a Matter of Survival.
The UK government is to set standards for carbon offsetting schemes to bring "greater clarity" to the industry.
The move comes as an increasing number of consumers try to limit the environmental impact of actions such as driving a car or flying by plane.
However, carbon offsetting schemes have been attacked for a lack of transparency and inconsistent prices.
Environment Secretary David Miliband said the voluntary standards would help consumers pick "genuine" projects.
Trees and bulbs
There are a number of ways that consumers can offset their carbon emissions, including paying for trees to be planted and buying energy-efficient light bulbs for use in developing nations.
The worry for the government has been that the benefits of many of the projects have proved difficult to verify and may be open to abuse.
I wonder...
How long will it be before a large enough market and high enough prices developes so that it becomes profitable to be willing to shut down a business so you can promise to cut carbon use and thus sell the carbon credits.
Airbus is a big contributor to carbon in the air. They mix theirs with fiber and call it a plane.
Since the United States didn't sign it we can IGNORE it which I plan to continue doing. I think we have planted enough trees to offset any 'harm' my family has done to this planet. PUKE!
They can all shove it as far as I'm concerned.
< AOL > SEND THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!! < /AOL >
Here is how it works. This was on Oprah, and the USPS says it is LEGAL!
When you buy six offsets, you sell each of them to six friends. Each of them buys six more and sends you back one!
You sell these to six more friends, who do the same thing!
At the end of six months, you will own 2/3 of ALL the Carbon Offsets on the Planet!!!
Now you can sell huge blocks of them to ENRON, SHELL, MOBILE, GENERAL MOTORS, etc. and then be able to buy up the remaining third of all offsets, thereby RULING THE WORLD.
Warmest Personal Regards, Energy Minister Reverend Dr. Field Marshal Mguu Mkimbe.
I'm all for reducing pollution, recycling and other efforts to reduce the impact we impose upon the planet.
I'm against using the human induced global warming hogwash to accomplish that end result. In fact, it actually makes me want to pollute more.
If the Greenies stand up and advocate reduce, reuse and recycle for the sake of reducing our impact and being environmentally friendly, I'm in whole heartedly.
When they try fear mongering based on psuedo science and try to stifle the debate over their ridiculous claims - I will refuse, resist and ridicule.
I HAVE to borrow this; it is funny (AND ACCURATE).
You could also flush $216 down tht toilet and have exactly the same impact.
I have half a gazillion carbon offsets. Unfortunately I can not transfer them out of Nigeria...
There are examples of other emission trading programs that could probably be researched to find an answer. Offsets for non-attainment areas (see Houston for example) can get pricey.
A better question is when will high enough prices develop so that it will be profitable to shut down a business, sell carbon credits for profit, and then re-open the business (under a different "name" ofcourse) in a country that could care less about CO2 emissions.
Not that I think that some nations that are excused from CO2 emission requirements under Kyoto, even if they are large producers of CO2, and projected to have CO2 emissions which exceed those from the U.S in the near future, would use their preffered status to benefit their economy at the expense of ours. They obviously understand that the U.N., the E.U., the NRDC, etc., know what is best and will voluntarily give up their developing prosperity for the common good of the world...
Why does the image of Elmer Gantry, Jerry Falwell, and others keep popping into my mind?
If they promised a health benefit the FDA would be all over their collective ***s. But since it is dealing with global warming and carbon offsets I guess they arent selling snake oil.
Here's more for your ping list, Diana.
Incredibly funny on dog, cat and even Reindeer farts. Not any Reindeer. These are Santa's Reindeer Carbon Credits. Go figure?
http://shop.easybeinggreen.com.au/categories.asp?cID=106
Just send it to six friends, and we'll split it 50-50! :-)
>> There are examples of other emission trading programs that could probably be researched to find an answer. Offsets for non-attainment areas (see Houston for example) can get pricey.
A better question is when will high enough prices develop so that it will be profitable to shut down a business, sell carbon credits for profit, and then re-open the business (under a different "name" ofcourse) in a country that could care less about CO2 emissions. <<
Sadly, I suspect you are right - this could become a profitable new line of "investment" that would actually have negative productivity for the country... very sad.
Aluminum companies in California have already shut down operations to resell electricity (for which they had locked-in contracts) when prices went sky-high a few years ago. In other words, California economics turned them from manufacturers into non-value-adding middlemen. To their credit, I don't think they laid off their workers; they just sent them home and kept paying them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.