Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 18 February 2007
Various big media television networks ^ | 17 February 2007 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 02/18/2007 5:12:27 AM PST by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, February 17th, 2007

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): White House press secretary Tony Snow.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Joe Biden, D-Del., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann Romney; actor Michael Douglas.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : White House press secretary Tony Snow; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson; magician Penn Jillette; former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele; and Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guests; lineup; news; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 881-889 next last
To: FreeReign

Thanks for adding those quotes of the President to this thread.


661 posted on 02/18/2007 11:18:01 AM PST by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
See? you missed it.

Missed what? The President had an excellent opportunity to respond to the House Dems and 17 RINOs who passed an unprecedented resolution during wartime that provided aid and comfort to our enemies and undermines the morale of our troops. It was more than just a difference of opinion.

If the Democrats have to resort to getting political cover from someone they despise, what does that say about them?

They are not seeking political cover. They are trying to destroy the US war effort in Iraq and insure defeat. And they are doing it all under the guise of supporting the troops but not the mission.

And, had Bush answered any other way, can you imagine how far the Democrats would be going right now? They might have decided to simply defund the entire war, and blame it on Bush for calling them unpatriotic.

I guess we shouldn't make the Dems really angry, because they would really, really take some drastic actions. It sounds like this business of not making the terrorists mad by "escalating" our attacks against them. Look, the Dems will do whatever it takes to win this politicial test of wills. They don't need a pretext or an excuse. If they believed that they had the support of the American public and it would be free from political consequences, they would defund the war in Iraq tomorrow.

Bush doesn't have to call them unpatriotic. He just has to explain how such a resolution will be perceived by the enemy, by our allies in the region, and by our troops. Let the MSM and the Dems draw their own conclusions. He could also point out that more than twice as many Iraqi security forces, military and police, have been killed than Americans or that they have lost three times as many in 2006. Iraiqs are fighting and dying for their country.

When Bush cant win, thank God he has the good sense to not play to lose.

It is not a game to win or lose. The very fact that the Dems felt so emboldened and empowered to even offer up such a Resolution and then have it passed says a lot about the shift in public opinion about the war. This was just the opening salvo and to dismiss it as "non-binding" misses the political significance of what has just happened.

662 posted on 02/18/2007 11:18:08 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal; Emilio Largo
Most everything is smarter than Juan! ; )

Even "several species of small furry animals sitting around in a cave and grooving with a Pict" are smarter than Juan...

663 posted on 02/18/2007 11:18:22 AM PST by tarheelswamprat (So what if I'm not rich? So what if I'm not one of the beautiful people? At least I'm not smart...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

Comment #664 Removed by Moderator

To: mainepatsfan

Vote Al Qaeda. Vote Democrat.

That's all I've got to say. : (


665 posted on 02/18/2007 11:19:57 AM PST by Chgogal (Vote Al Qaeda. Vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

And what would he [Hagel] propose we offer them?

*****

I remember that a few years ago when Iran had a massive earthquake, they would not even let Americans in to help. Did they let our supplies help freezing homeless Iranians? No.


666 posted on 02/18/2007 11:22:29 AM PST by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: maica
) that these conferences take place around 11am on a weekday, and whether because of strategy or safety concerns are not publicized by the White House more than a few hours ahead of time. Even people who might like to tivo or set a vcr are often unprepared to do so.

They are repeated on C-SPAN and the transcripts are on the Internet. The basic problem is that most Americans could care less about politics. We are lucky to get 50% to turn out for most elections and the numbers are usually far less. As a result, people are easily swayed by lies and deceptions.

2) by a magnitude of powers, what most people hear as 'news' is what they hear from Leno, Letterman, Colbert, npr, mtv, and a hundred other outlets who filter the President's words.

Sad, but true.

667 posted on 02/18/2007 11:23:05 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: maica

:)


668 posted on 02/18/2007 11:23:37 AM PST by FreeReign (Still waiting for the best conservative candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies]

To: 4butnomorethan30characters; Alas Babylon!
An award from Alasbabylon!- congratulations


669 posted on 02/18/2007 11:26:19 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: neverhillorat

Amen


670 posted on 02/18/2007 11:27:01 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

Comment #671 Removed by Moderator

To: kabar
If they believed that they had the support of the American public and it would be free from political consequences, they would defund the war in Iraq tomorrow.

...and begin impeachment proceedings against both Bush and Cheney the day after.

672 posted on 02/18/2007 11:28:07 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Just remember, fully HALF of the people you encounter in life are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: snugs
He is very much the man to say what will give him the best press and put him in the best light with the people he is with at the time. Is that what you want from your President I would rather have a man who believes in what he is doing and does it regardless of others around him - and I do not mean the general public or the press Blair has no real interest in either group.

That describes most politicians. How did Blair get the Labour Party to go along with sending troops to Iraq and keeping them there for as long as he has? I understand the UK will cutting its troops down to 5,000 this summer or about half of what they have there now. I still credit Blair for political courage and doing something unpopular and with less support than GWB had.

673 posted on 02/18/2007 11:28:08 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: kabar
It is a mistake to assume that anyone in America, no matter which side they are on, still need to have the war explained to them. Anyone wishing to know the facts can find them anywhere they care to look. The President does not need to continue to make his points ad-nauseum. The time comes when you either get it, or you dont.

It is not about avoiding Democrat anger, it is about not poisoning the well. Who doesnt know by now what the Dems are about? And if you find someone that stupid, why waste time trying to convince them? The job is not to convince anyone, the job is to win.

Anyone making the argument that Bush didnt fight hard enough is being unrealistic. It is not Bush's job to fight, it is ours. The leader of the free-world does not need to reduce himself to the level of a John Murtha in order to get his way.

I will question anyone who thinks the President should have done more, by asking them just what they have done on their own. I think Bush should spend his time keeping the nation safe and the economy strong. I leave the Cheerleading, arguing and the rest to others.

We should stop believing that those who disagree with Bush just didn't hear it right, we should understand that they are either against us, or they are just plain too dumb to care.

674 posted on 02/18/2007 11:28:42 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

That may still come after their Congressional committees start their investigations to build a dossier.


675 posted on 02/18/2007 11:31:14 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
There is no way to summarize this post. It is required reading for everyone, everywhere. It's just loaded with everything from the war to the election to you name it!

The biggest thing I got out of it is actually how well the surge tactics are working for everyone! Mookie is hiding in Iran,which shows who he really is, the politicos in Iraq who have been "taking the people's money" as it is described, have been told by Maliki to get out!,

We are finding terrorist after terrorist and the entire areas is being secured at a rapid rate with 75% of the Iraqi army showing up as requested.

It's all a win, win win situation! As Hannity often says "the greatest story never told."

Once again we get all this from Ali Veritas-- Queen of links and once again she shows just how good her work truly is.

676 posted on 02/18/2007 11:33:01 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: kabar
On one level I agree with you but I find it hard to get beyond the Clintonlite smile maybe that is me being shallow but I see most of his views as more Clinton than Bush.

My own personal belief re the WOT is that Blair wanted to be treated as a serious world leader for this he needed US support and in particular the US President. He got this by his unwavering support for GWB and the WOT. He will for ever be welcome at many political think tanks in the States etc etc this is all part of his legacy in my opinion.

If you hear him on world economic forums, climate change forums etc etc it is almost like listening to Clinton.

I will always support what he did and believe it was the right thing but I do have serious doubts regarding why he did it.
677 posted on 02/18/2007 11:33:15 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I finally saw an episode of that Red-Eye show on Fox.

I never stay up late enough to watch it...unless, my granddaughter, who stays up VERY late is here.

After she finally fell asleep at about 1:45 AM..I turned to Fox and Red-Eye was on...

WOW do those people on that show talk FAST!!! It sounded like a show I would like...I just can't stay up late enough to watch it every night though.


678 posted on 02/18/2007 11:34:02 AM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: All

Time for me to depart, please freep me if you want any further awards posted.

Roast lamb with veg and Yorkshire Pudding followed by dropped scones which are similar to your pancakes.


679 posted on 02/18/2007 11:35:06 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
Also when will People see that she has non Union People working in her Vineyards and Restaurant. Steny Hoyer is a mean, nasty guy but he looks almost statesman like next to her, and he is undoubtedly waiting for the right moment for the Coup. He knows Nanzee is a thug like her Thug Daddy and Brother, so he will be very careful but I would imagine there are lots of conversations going on between Steny and some of the Party elite that wants to win, and stay in the Majority. She and Murtha could almost double handedly ruin their chances in 2008. There is no honor among thieves, and Murtha is too crazy and senile to know not to crap where you dine, and Nanzee is too power mad to realize that everything she says or does is going to come back to haunt the Rats in this 24-7 New Media World.
680 posted on 02/18/2007 11:38:21 AM PST by samantha (The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 881-889 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson