Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 18 February 2007
Various big media television networks ^ | 17 February 2007 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 02/18/2007 5:12:27 AM PST by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, February 17th, 2007

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): White House press secretary Tony Snow.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Joe Biden, D-Del., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann Romney; actor Michael Douglas.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : White House press secretary Tony Snow; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.; New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson; magician Penn Jillette; former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele; and Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guests; lineup; news; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 881-889 next last
To: demkicker

Thanks, the worse part is that Mrs. Clinton frequently appeared on Greta's show with Matthew Linder playing an important part. Looks like FNS want to get closer to Mrs.Clinton which is why Linder was picked up as senior producer. Well, making news & getting ratings are different things. Wallace & FNS wants the former than the latter.


341 posted on 02/18/2007 7:47:16 AM PST by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Oh dear Lord, Kabar, you are just soooooooo right.

A perfect example of how Bush blew it.

Damn, to give the Dems credit for being patriotic in any damn sense of the word is totally wrong. Bush should have JUMPED all over that question, he should have pointed out, loudly and angrily, that even IF the House of Reps has problems with how he, as CIC, handles the war, they certainly shouldn't be passing a "non-binding" resolution that the rest of the world will surely see as binding and a slap in the face of the leader of our military. He should state loudly for the soccer moms to hear that congress shouldn't be broadcasting all this to world. I still think Americans would understand this.

He just, ladidah, ladidah, ladidah, let's it pass.

I'm not impressed people and nothing anybody can tell me will change my mind. I really believe BUSH can change the tide of this thing but he's too busy defending Pelosi's need for a big-assed jet and just two weeks ago Bush was right here in Delaware, Dupont....to encourage grain alcohol or some such. But Bush was here, right smack dab in Castle's territory with this big win, wooooooo, for little ole Delaware.

Yet Castle, a REPUBLICAN, this week spits in the man's face.

They know Bush is a wimp and if y'all were to be honest with your own selves, you know it too.

The opposition has no respect for Dubya, his own party has little respect, and the hopeful base such as you and I sat and hoped he would be a man and fight back.

I have very little respect for the man.


342 posted on 02/18/2007 7:47:44 AM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

He has to say that. He's not some Senator or Congress Critter that can just go off on a Kennedy or Byrd style rant.

The President is supposed to appear above the fray.

The ones that NEED to be expressing the Presidents sentiment are those Congress Critters that call themselves "Republicans" in the House and Senate.

They are the ones that are supposed to say what a President with any kind of class can not.


343 posted on 02/18/2007 7:47:52 AM PST by txradioguy (In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Engineer Bn. K.I.A. 25 Apr. 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
You got their number Bah and thanks again for doing this, it's like being there.
344 posted on 02/18/2007 7:48:29 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

"So unless you see what he says "live"...you will never truly know what the President said or didn't say thanks to the fifth colum in the DBM."

Absolutely true! And they carry precious few of his live statements . . . all the while talking over him telling us what he is 'saying'.



345 posted on 02/18/2007 7:48:44 AM PST by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: bray

Amen


346 posted on 02/18/2007 7:48:52 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

I loved the way that Chris Wallace questioned Levin's assertion that China joined with Clinton in dealing with Korea

6 months and 11,000 deaths into the Korean War, Truman didn't cut and run.

Instead, Truman's administration

1. drafted thousands more young men and
2. imposed full wartime censorship.

Imagine if Bush tried to do either of those two things.

A Tribute to Draftees,By Dennis Byrne.

In the Korean War, 1.8 million were draftees, compared with 1.3 million volunteers.

In the Vietnam War, draftees finally became a minority of those who served, about one-third.

This will surprise some: About 70 percent of those killed in Vietnam were volunteers.


347 posted on 02/18/2007 7:49:25 AM PST by syriacus (Are MURTHA and OBAMA rabid ANTI-SHI'ITES? They preferred keeping Saddam and his Sunnis in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
When Britt leaves FNC will be in deep...uhhh water!!
348 posted on 02/18/2007 7:49:55 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

"I have very little respect for the man."

Gee how would we have ever guessed that? *rolls eyes*

The folks at DU that lurk here are enjoying your agreement with them about the President right about now.

As I just poinnted out to someone else...how about instead of blaiming all of this on one man...you get just as pissed at the Republicans in the House and Senate that are supposed to act as the literal voice of the President in these matters and say the things he can't...and chastize them for remaing so damn silent.

It would appear that the only Republican left in Congress with his testicles intact is Mitch McConnell!!!!!


349 posted on 02/18/2007 7:50:59 AM PST by txradioguy (In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Engineer Bn. K.I.A. 25 Apr. 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy; Fishtalk; All

So unless you see what he says "live"...you will never truly know what the President said or didn't say thanks to the fifth colum in the DBM.

&&&&&

Example: President Bush gave a powerhouse press conference this week. No reporter cought him in a gotcha soundbite. Ergo: no reporting on what he said, much less actually hearing his voice on the radio.

Ann Compton is the WH reporter for ABC news; I hear her voice every half hour when I listen to our station that carries Rush, Sean, Mark Levin and a solidly conservative morning program.

She played a 13 word clip of the President's voice ONCE in her reports the day after that conference. I'm sure it was so she could refute anyone who might say she never did it. I know this because I started listening early in the morning specifically to how ABCnews would cover the conference, and heard her tell us about the conference for a few hours before she actually included the soundbite in her report - exactly once - then reverted to just her voice in her report.

Just remember the 8 years of Clinton -- his voice was on the news every half hour!!!!


350 posted on 02/18/2007 7:51:16 AM PST by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

That is not the George W Bush I observe daily


351 posted on 02/18/2007 7:52:19 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; All

For those who missed it:
Welcoming Heroes Home (Must see)
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/02/16/welcoming-heroes-home/


352 posted on 02/18/2007 7:52:24 AM PST by AliVeritas (Stop Global Dhimming. Demand testicular fortitude from the hill. Call the crusade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
Ok, even if you what you say is true with regard to the Pres never defending himself (and I disagree that he does this), then where are the rest of us???

During the Whitewater/Lewinsky scandals, hundreds of dem spokesmouths went out to vigorously defend Clinton. Where are our Bush defenders? LOL, joining, in many cases, the Bush basheres!!!!

If Republicans and conservatives "pundits" spend 1/8 of the effort defending this Pres as the Clintonistas did theirs we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

Many a dem had written an op-ed as to why Clinton was being worngly attacked in my local rag, the Montgomery (Ala) Advertiser. Not one op-ed supporting Pres Bush, though, through his host of media generated "troubles". I continously hound my Congressional delegation as to why they never go to bat for the Pres. It's shameful.

353 posted on 02/18/2007 7:52:48 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
No way to summarize this post it's must read FR at it's finest, great job Morgan.
354 posted on 02/18/2007 7:52:48 AM PST by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Thanks for the update. It's not on here for another ten minutes. I'm looking forward to seeing it.


355 posted on 02/18/2007 7:53:36 AM PST by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy; Fishtalk
So unless you see what he says "live"...you will never truly know what the President said or didn't say thanks to the fifth colum in the DBM.

Fishtalk, he is right on with this post. And that's *if* the networks carry it and *if* cable news doesn't cut away to a car chase or new annanicholsmith development. Then they have a couple of democrats on to demonize the president's words. The evening news then carries a few lines of the POTUS speech and then the buzz words of the week from the demos. That is what the general public is subjected to.

356 posted on 02/18/2007 7:55:34 AM PST by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: windchime; All

The DBM learned well the lesson from the 8 years of Reagan. Ronaldus Magnus had a way of speaking past the cameras...past the talking heads...and speaking directly to the people. So his message came through loud and clear.

This time around...when this current plain spoken President came into office...the DBM was better equipped to distort deflect and twist what the people thought they were hearing the President say.

Never again will the DBM allow a President or Presidential Candidate reach out to the people and bypass their control of the news to get his/her message out.

All you have to do is look at how his approval numbers jump when he speaks directly to the people as opposed to staged and stilted press conferences where the reporters like that sleazeball David Gregory circle the man like hungry sharks.


357 posted on 02/18/2007 7:56:02 AM PST by txradioguy (In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Engineer Bn. K.I.A. 25 Apr. 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
Agreed people forget that the President is also the Head of State can you imagine the British Queen saying some of the things that people think the President of the United States should.

He had a difficult dual role and has to walk a fine line with it. He can have the occasional digs especially when campaigning for fellow Republicans but on many other occasions he has to appear above partisan politics.
358 posted on 02/18/2007 7:56:07 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: windchime

Great comment


359 posted on 02/18/2007 7:58:46 AM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
I saw that great story. Check this out:

helpsteven.com

360 posted on 02/18/2007 7:59:01 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Have you seen Rick Perry's brain? Neither has he!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 881-889 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson