Posted on 02/12/2007 12:02:08 PM PST by PhiKapMom
New York, Feb 12 -
The Rudy Giuliani Exploratory Committee today announced that Congressman Pete Sessions and former Congresswoman Susan Molinari are supporting Mayor Rudy Giuliani to be the next President of the United States. Both will take active roles aiding Giuliani’s exploratory efforts, with Sessions working to build support in the House and Molinari serving as both Senior Advisor and Chairman of Washington outreach.
In announcing their endorsement, Sessions and Molinari praised Giuliani’s proven leadership.
“I’m supporting Mayor Giuliani for President because he has the experience, record of results and vision to unite our country during these uncertain times. I’m honored to be a part of his team and will work hard to elect Rudy Giuliani as the next President of the United States,” said Congressman Pete Sessions.
Congresswoman Susan Molinari stated, “I’ve seen the results of Mayor Giuliani’s leadership – cutting taxes, transforming a historic deficit into a multi-billion dollar surplus and reducing crime. Without a doubt, Rudy Giuliani is the demonstrated leader America needs to tackle difficult challenges and move our country forward.”
Mayor Rudy Giuliani thanked both Congressman Sessions and former Congresswoman Molinari for their support. “I’m honored to have the support of two Republican leaders who have made a real difference as public servants.”
If the sponsor of the event has no problem with it, what's yours????
That's why the NY Times hates him so much!
Please tell me you are kidding.
No adult, especially my age, appreciates being lectured about anything.
The Haley Barbour issue is closed--and no I would never support Rudy Giuliani under any circumstances, no matter whom they put with him.
Thanks! See this link for main source.
Still at it I see. Its a featured story at demorats.org BTW.
Also BTW, Rudy gave $80,000 to the charity, not $20,000.
It's a keeper, thanks!
"Also BTW, Rudy gave $80,000 to the charity, not $20,000."
After he was busted for being a greedy scumbag. I guess that makes him a saint in YOUR eyes, eh?
FO
After he was busted for being a greedy scumbag. I guess that makes him a saint in YOUR eyes, eh?
Don't put words in my mouth. I made no comments either way about Rudy's sainthood status. And don't change the subject. I'm just documenting the facts, which is something you falsely reported.
Back to the facts;
The speech and payment was over two years ago.
This democrat.org "bust" was last week.
Based on those facts it appears your statement is false.
BTW, when was the last time you got off your a$$ and donated 80 grand?
Any principle that requires you to do nothing about it, but instead, to just proclaim it loudly, is no principle at all in my book.
And no, he actually didn't, he said he didn't think the President would appoint judges that would overrule RvW. That's not the same thing.
Anyhow, if you are so stupid as to think Santorum would have won had he endorsed Toomey, I don't think you are reachable.
Too bad you can't come and annoy us. Trolls are verboten on the Dose, and with your tagline, that's clearly what you are........either that, or you're a moron yourself, and are just trying to advertise it.
Too bad, little one....... only grownups allowed on the Dose. And I have a gut feeling you'll never make it there.
Don't judge others by yourself and your own feelings; especially since you have yet to live through a presidential primary on FR and I have.
Rumors based on wishful thinking. Katrina didn't help any.
Then, apparently "judicial restraint" is not a principle in your "book."
You need a book with more words and fewer pictures.
And no, he actually didn't, he said he didn't think the President would appoint judges that would overrule RvW. That's not the same thing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1269675/posts
Anyhow, if you are so stupid as to think Santorum would have won had he endorsed Toomey, I don't think you are reachable.
I've just utterly destroyed your first two assertions. I'm taking bets on the possibility your third is any less assinine.
OK, my facts were wrong. He divorced his second wife after being caught committing adultery. He's an unfaithful man.
And what's wrong with repeating myself? Those with low expectations, who think Rudi is as good as it gets, repeat themselves many times a day at FR.
sw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.