Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As Allen points out, Barack Hussein Obama harbors some evil ideas.
1 posted on 02/12/2007 5:13:44 AM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jmaroneps37

Barack Hussein Obama is a Socialist, and Socialists are evil by the very beliefs they hold, Socialism.


2 posted on 02/12/2007 5:19:03 AM PST by stockpirate (Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine." - Rudy Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Definitely his FAITH, plays a very important part of his ability to vote with passion.


3 posted on 02/12/2007 5:20:34 AM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
According to the record, the bill would allow doctors to kill babies born alive after a botched abortion. Think about that. A baby is born in spite of a monster’s attempt to kill him/her in an abortion and the doctor can cover up this “mistake” by killing the baby there in the operating room. Once the “mistake” is erased the doctor is free go play a round of golf. Obama voted FOR that measure.

Perhaps the bottom line of this bill is just as stated, but it would make for a more convincing argument if the actual wording of the bill was excerpted and then analyzed.

4 posted on 02/12/2007 5:23:02 AM PST by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Obama voted to take the death penalty off the table when a gang member is convicted of killing a person in furtherance of the goals of his gang.

I stated in another post that Obama was at little risk except from some Muslim who thought he was not radical enough. I stand corrected. Osamabama would not want a fellow Muzzie done to death (gang member) if convicted of killing a person (non believer) in furtherance of the goals (bring forth the Caliphate) of his gang (Islam).

5 posted on 02/12/2007 5:24:48 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Well, isn't this horrifying.

Regards, Ivan

6 posted on 02/12/2007 5:30:49 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
We should remember to keep using his middle name, Hussein, in the title every time there's a new thread about him. I read somewhere that he doesn't like it used. Wonder why. I read a letter to the editor a couple weeks back where the writer wondered if Obama was a sleeper.
7 posted on 02/12/2007 5:33:03 AM PST by Shannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Good article. I'll add this:

Here's all any Conservative needs to know about Barrack Hussein Obama:

Special Interest Group Ratings:

Planned Parenthood - 100% Support
National Right To Life - 0% Support
NARAL - 100% Support
Americans for Tax Reform - 0% Support
ACLU - 83% Support
NEA - 100% Support
NOW Hags - 100% Support
Citizens Against Government Waste - 13% Support
Gun Owners of America - 0% Support
NRA - "F" Rating
Federation for American Immigration Reform - 0% Support
US Border Patrol - 8% Support
Unions - 82% - 100% Support
Population Connection - 100% Support (These are the 'Zero Growth' freaks)

http://vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=BS030017

[Barrack Hussein Obama's record in the Illinois senate:]

- Opposed the Defense of Marriage Act; would work to repeal it in the U.S. Senate; would not vote for any legislation that would restrict the ability of gays and lesbians to marry.
- Opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act four times in Illinois. A similar bill passed the U.S. Senate 98-0. The Born Alive bill would have prohibited a baby from being born alive but left to die according to the mother's wishes. Obama inexplicably opposed this bill not once, twice, or three times, but four times.
- Obama took almost $90,000 in bundled contributions from the Council for a Livable World. The council is a well-known anti-defense organization.
- Obama puts rigid ideology before what's best for the people of Illinois, and presumably he would do that as President as well. He has on several occasions made public his opposition to the NAFTA trade agreement and his belief that it must be negotiated. All the while thanks to NAFTA, Illinois exports $1.3 billion in agricultural goods to Canada.
- Obama refused to vote for a bill in the Illinois State Senate that would have increased penalties for drug traffickers.
- Obama voted against a bill that would have delivered the death penalty to gang members who murder first responders.
- Finally, just in case you thought it couldn't get any worse, Obama was the only member of the Illinois State Senate to vote against a bill that prohibited early release for sexual predators.

Can’t kill the innocent fast enough, can’t free the guilty soon enough!


11 posted on 02/12/2007 5:39:58 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

I think this article goes a littl too far in blaming Obama for being just another liberal. Unless we say that they are all evil.

These things Obama stands for are nothing more or less than other liberals stand for.

Do we want this liberal in the White House.? No
We dont want any liberal in the White House.


12 posted on 02/12/2007 5:40:20 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Obama, worse than you think...but not worse than Hillary.

She has the political power, perniciousness, and people to carry out her evil designs. She can "make" others do things for her. That alone makes her more dangerous than Obama.

Obama may be the media's "darling of the month," but he won't be there for long. Hillary will see to that.

13 posted on 02/12/2007 5:42:02 AM PST by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Nothing like calling a Spade a Spade.

http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19970115


14 posted on 02/12/2007 5:42:39 AM PST by deathrace2000 ("I regret that I have but one life to give for my country", Nathan Hale before execution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
He stands out in a party of evil people as one of its most dangerous members... Barack Hussein Obama voted for a bill that would allow abortionists to cover their "mistakes" in a most gruesome manner. According to the record, the bill would allow doctors to kill babies born alive after a botched abortion. Think about that.

In contrast, he has the most polished manner of anyone in the Democrat field. Because of this, and the fact that he has received fawning media coverage despite the fact that he has achieved little, I believe him to be the devil's candidate.

Don't take this guy lightly. He has hell's backing.

16 posted on 02/12/2007 5:45:14 AM PST by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Above and beyond all that...he's a smoker.


21 posted on 02/12/2007 6:05:42 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Voted Free Republic's Most Eligible Bachelor: 2006. Love them Diebold machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Liberal Democrats are, for the most part, silly, naïve little minded people.

My vote for Free Republic quote of the month!

23 posted on 02/12/2007 6:14:40 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
A baby is born in spite of a monster’s attempt to kill him/her in an abortion and the doctor can cover up this “mistake” by killing the baby there in the operating room.

Seriously, how is this different from allowing late term abortions at all?

25 posted on 02/12/2007 6:30:57 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Barack Obama is vastly overrated. People are generating this huge hype over a guy who has virtually no experience. I can understand why people got excited about Colin Powell (though I think he's too liberal) or Condi Rice, but Obama remains a mystery to me, except for the fact that he's a bit of an orator and can be humorous. But that's not what makes a President. The man's resume is liberal and paper-thin. The liberals are trying to convince as that they're supporting, in spite of the fact that he's black. The truth is, though, I think many are supporting him BECAUSE he is black and it makes them feel good in their little liberal milieu. But electing a black President proves nothing if the black man is useless.

Barack Obama is all style and no substance, or shall I say no good substance. In the end, though, the joke may be on the Democrats if they plow ahead and nominate someone of Obama's caliber. Is America ready to elect a black President? Just have a look at how well the the high profile black candidates for governor and US Senate did in 2006. That should help answer the question.


28 posted on 02/12/2007 8:58:16 AM PST by Princip. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Obraham Lib-con: The Other Dark Meat!
29 posted on 02/12/2007 8:58:52 AM PST by Bommer (Global Warming: The only warming phenomena that occurs in the Summer and ends in the Winter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Never mind all that. He's good-looking and knows how to turn a phrase or two. When you hear him, you'll forget the fact he's an extreme Leftist, even by Democrat standards. Obamagasm is about choosing image over substance.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

30 posted on 02/12/2007 9:02:38 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Liberal Democrats are, for the most part, silly, naïve little minded people

I like how he puts that :)

40 posted on 02/12/2007 12:29:10 PM PST by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson