Skip to comments.
Conservatives target Rudy
Newsday ^
| Feb 8 2007
| CRAIG GORDON
Posted on 02/08/2007 9:16:33 PM PST by Reagan Man
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 301-312 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Don't believe the lying polls. They're meaningless this far out. A simple expression of name identification. Nothing more. Rudy Giuliani will not be the nominee of the GOP. But if he is, it's far worse than you think. The GOP will cease to exist as a viable national political party. Actually it will become stronger as Rudy brings back areas of the country that have left the Republican Party and some of the extreme elements on the Right go off and support Tancredo or Paul or some other wingnut.
To: IslandJeff
Good post - - thanks for that.
Regards,
LH
To: Blackirish
Hunter as Chairman of the Armed Services Comm is not the backbencher.
Also when you can't write his name correctly it tells me you as a purist and unappeaseable will not support the republican candidate.
Grow up.
143
posted on
02/09/2007 12:18:45 AM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
To: television is just wrong
It happens. The perfect is not the enemy of the good (Arnold, however, is making me somewhat circumspect), and half a loaf is still better than none, regardless.
Hang in there.
144
posted on
02/09/2007 12:19:06 AM PST
by
IslandJeff
(that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
To: upsdriver
It's fairly sad that a British person has to point this out to you, but there are several obstacles to overturning Roe vs. Wade. Firstly, the Supreme Court hasn't overturned it yet; note, it's the Supreme Court, not the President, who does that. Second, even if it is overturned, the Constitution is specific - the powers not enumerated in it are reserved for the states or the people, namely, it would come down to a state by state vote on the subject, unless, of course, you could get an anti-abortion amendment to the constitution.
Unless a Supreme Court justice dies, Rudy has no effect on the first item - he has already said he would appoint judges like Roberts and Alito. The second item, he has no effect on at all.
The President is not a King. But then again, strange a British person has to remind you of that...but obviously the spleen is not an organ for thinking.
Ivan
145
posted on
02/09/2007 12:19:23 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
You really are full of so many wrong assumptions that I don't always know where to start. So, I'll ask you a question: Where did you get the idea that I support Duncan Hunter?
146
posted on
02/09/2007 12:19:41 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: EternalVigilance
Fine, who do you support then?
Ivan
147
posted on
02/09/2007 12:20:37 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: SoCalPol
What is it? Huntin or Dunkin...sorry no one even knows his name.
To: MadIvan
After losing the House and having two Republican members go to jail I cannot think of a worse position from which to run for President in 2008 than a long-term Republican Congresscritter who was never in the leadership. Duncan Hunter has about as much chance of winning the nomination as Rachel Hunter.
To: BonnieJ
Yes, I was here and somehow managed to live through that WAR.
Yes, it was THAT divided and vile and nasty; just a bit later into everything, than now. The garbage, posted against now President Bush and his supporters began in '99. The same people who are against Rudy, who survived the very late in the day purges, were virulently against W back then.
There were several factions...those who favored Pat Buchanan, those for Alan Keyes, and the Libertarians............all ganging up against now President Bush and his supporters.
And there were NO Mods here in '99, so you can only try to imagine what THAT was like; you'll never come close to really being able to imagine that!
To: MadIvan
Second, even if it is overturned, the Constitution is specific - the powers not enumerated in it are reserved for the states or the people, namely, it would come down to a state by state vote on the subject, unless, of course, you could get an anti-abortion amendment to the constitution. Oh Lord. Being preached to by a Brit on the American Constitution. It's really too late at night for this. But, here's your answer anyway: The Court could rule that the child in the womb is a person (which they are, of course) leaving them protected by the words of the Preamble and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Bingo. Problem solved.
151
posted on
02/09/2007 12:22:43 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: EternalVigilance
Don't believe the lying polls. They're meaningless this far out. A simple expression of name identification. Nothing more.
Whistling by the graveyard.....EV and you know it.
To: SoCalPol
Hunter is still Chairman? Really? I thought he was replaced by a 'rat.
To: MadIvan
None of your business. But I assure you, it won't be someone who supports all of the immoral positions of the Democrat Party, and none of the important provisions of the Reagan platform of the GOP, like Rudy Giuliani.
154
posted on
02/09/2007 12:24:40 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: EternalVigilance
Santorum is a RINO?
Allen is a RINO?
I guess that Graf is a RINO too?
Should I continue? And yes, I know that I'm not naming all House members. :-)
To: nopardons
You're drinking again, aren't you.
156
posted on
02/09/2007 12:25:48 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: EternalVigilance
The Court could rule that the child in the womb is a person (which they are, of course) leaving them protected by the words of the Preamble and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Bingo. Problem solved."My dear guests, I am Mr. Roark, your host. Welcome to Fantasy Island!!"
To: Reagan Man
You blame President Bush?
Oh never mind, you always blame him for EVERYTHING!
To: Blackirish
Whistling by the graveyard.....EV and you know it. If I am, it's where RINOs like you want to bury the Grand Old Party.
159
posted on
02/09/2007 12:26:34 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: epow
"I would dearly love to vote for a conservative, pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment, anti-illegal immigration Republican nominee"
I'm a lost cause. I have reached the point where I don't give a hoot what party the candidates claim. I want a president that embraces all you expressed, and would be pleased as heck to see a well deserved A for American tacked to his name. Tom Tancredo would fit the bill, but he is little known across the nation.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 301-312 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson