Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women Shun 'The Man Who Has It All'
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2-9-2007 | Roger Highfield

Posted on 02/08/2007 6:02:58 PM PST by blam

Women shun 'the man who has it all'

By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
Last Updated: 1:23am GMT 09/02/2007

Some men are just too good to be true, according to a study published today by psychologists.

Men who are good-looking, single, and earn a fortune are not as attractive as good-looking men who have an average kind of job, according to the research.

Simon Chu of the University of Central Lancashire and colleagues studied how women weigh up male physical attractiveness and socio-economic status when considering a long-term relationship.

They collected data from 186 female university students in the UK, with an average age of 23, asking them to look at personal ads of various men and rank them in terms of attractiveness as a long-term partner. Each advertisement showed a "mug shot" and provided basic information about his age, occupation and what he is seeking in a partner.

Images of the men ranged from those who were previously measured to be highly attractive, attractive and unattractive. Eighteen different occupations were also randomly assigned, from architect and company director to waiter, postman and gardener.

Surprisingly, researchers found that highly attractive men of medium status scored better than highly attractive men of high status.

The team, whose work is published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences, speculates that women perceive highly attractive men of increasing status to be less faithful and "too good to be true".


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: man; psychology; shun; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 next last
To: Defiant

"Simple. They want to mold someone they can control."

I watched my sister chase after handsome wealthy men for 10 years.
She eventually learned that where there is one of these men...there are at least five? ten? women around him with the same goal in mind.
Even if the wealthy boyfriend seemed perfect for a little while, eventually he was "distracted" by a newcomer - there is always someone younger and prettier coming along.

She wound up marrying a handsome man with a middle class job.
And no....she doesn't "mold" him.


141 posted on 02/08/2007 9:14:36 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marie
I think that it is your head was following your heart. Many women go Blink, Blink a hero, my man. To not repeat the past is is a sign of maturity sorely lacking in this day and age.
142 posted on 02/08/2007 9:15:35 PM PST by Little Bill (Welcome to the Newly Socialist State of New Hampshire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Marie

You have FReep Mail.


143 posted on 02/08/2007 9:20:52 PM PST by Little Bill (Welcome to the Newly Socialist State of New Hampshire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: blam
From personal experience as someone who was always told I "had it all"; model, actor, politician, executive, I had it all. I can say I agree with this report. It took me half a lifetime to get married.

I never tried to present myself as anything other than who I was. My marketing message to women was "what you see today is what you'll see everyday". Perhaps that is a message that runs fundamentally against nature. I don't know. I really rejected the notion of putting ones best foot foreward as I didn't want to deceive her into thinking I was something I wasn't. While I love my wife and children, there were several others who I thought were my dream come true only to wake up to the sounds of sirens going by in the night.

Nothing ever worked out and I have little idea why. Women can speak of jerks but the number of times I was stood up on a date and the resulting pain I can't count. I tried to be kind, supportive, encouraging and trustworthy in every respect only to repeatedly suffer the anguish of having who I thought was "Mrs Right" fall for someone else who always put his best foot foreward and more times than not had loser tatooed across his forehead.

Interestingly enough, after falling for someone else, every one of them became uncomfortably warm and irritatingly friendly after they got married... and subsequently divorced. I actually stay in contact (somewhat resentfully) with most but am not sure why. They do nothing for me and it's me who has to help them. Perhaps in my mind, I wish i could get in a time capsule and go back.

There is no chance of me being unfaithfull to my wife but there were others in the past who I had far, far stronger feelings for. So, say I settled for my wife. Perhaps i did but it doesn't change the fact that my promise to her was until "death do us part". Of course, it takes two to tango and if they didn't want to dance, what was there to do? The call for last dance was years ago.

I'm sure some will try to psychoanalyze me and have at it.

144 posted on 02/08/2007 9:23:32 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Or wealthy, highly attractive men would be hard to "keep". Too much competition.


145 posted on 02/08/2007 9:25:08 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fso301

"There is no chance of me being unfaithfull to my wife but there were others in the past who I had far, far stronger feelings for. So, say I settled for my wife."

How sad.
I hope as time passes your memories of other women will fade away and you will come to appreciate your wife for the gift that she is.
She deserves better than to be considered 2nd (or 3rd) best.


146 posted on 02/08/2007 9:29:42 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
Nope. The *heart* needs to follow the head.

1. Know thyself. And I mean *serious* soul searching.
2. Using *logic* and wisdom gleaned from past experience, make a list of qualities *required* for your ideal mate and a second list of qualities that are absolute no-no's.
3. Begin dating people you find attractive. After *every* date, check your list. If they have one quality on the "no" list or if you can tell they are missing a quality on the other side, *DUMP THEM IMMEDIATELY* and move on.
4. When you find a person who fits your list to a "T" you allow yourself to grow closer and to get to know them better. Sometimes it works out at this point, sometimes you get to add things to your "NO" list. Sometimes you find that you aren't the one *they're* looking for and you have to let them go.

As a woman, my heart is directly connected to my body. Both will short-circuit my brain.

I'd seen too many women caught in relationships with obviously bad men because they let their heart lead. I didn't know what to do to get a different result. (Hadn't seen an example of it done any other way.) Seeing this pattern over and over again, I decided to try the opposite tactic. I'm a human. I've got a big brain. What if I used that instead of my emotions? Heck, it was worth a try. I did it and it worked. The only time it doesn't work is when someone *thinks* they're using their brain and they're really deluding themselves into seeing what isn't there.

So where did love come into the picture? Well, when I saw that this great guy fit my list (and he was "into" me) I decided to trust him (and to trust the logical reasoning that led me to him). And I fell in love.

I've fallen in love with this man a thousand times. Every time he makes me laugh or I over-hear him talking on the phone, every time he grumbles about the lights being left on or lets me win an argument, every day of my life I fall in love with him all over again. (Heck, I'm in love with the way he laces his boots.) It's easy to love the right person.

147 posted on 02/08/2007 9:34:45 PM PST by Marie (Unintended consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
I have a stainless & gold Rolex that is over thirty years old and has only been in the shop only for cleaning, new face every once in awhile and the links tightened. It has been run over and buried by a tractor, dunked in many kinds of chemicals(one reason I bought it) and suffered many other abuses. It is semi-retired now.

I bought gold Sieko last year year on a cruise for a great price, women spot it as being a real gold watch( they ask is that a Rolex) and not gold toned,plated or anything less than gold. Men as rule don't notice. I was planing on buying a Tag Heuer, when I saw the Sieko. With so many fake Rolexs around, plus so copies of the stainless and gold model, no one plays any attention to it.

I had a gold Rolex which as a woman magnet is better than a Porsche. Hence my comment.

I share your pain, it seems that all the good ones are married or committed. I have found cruises are the best place to meet nice women, unfortunately they have all lived in places far from West Texas(which is easy).

I'm not talking of a hurried night
A frantic tumble then a shy goodbye
Creeping home before it gets too light

148 posted on 02/08/2007 9:41:53 PM PST by razorback-bert (Posted by Time's Man of the Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife; fso301
I think (hope) that it's common to look back on old romances with fondness, and perhaps even regret when compared to the everyday struggles of life and marriage and kids, etc.

However, whenever I have thoughts like this I just think of how lucky I am to have married someone that is able to look past all my faults and STILL love me after all these years. The girls/ women I dated were all just fun and games compared to the real love (ups and downs) I have now.
149 posted on 02/08/2007 9:45:47 PM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: blam

I think the key here is that they were evaluating for a *long-term* relationship. Any man who is good-looking, high status, and rich is much more likely to dump you when someone better comes along, than someone who is still quite acceptable but not both gorgeous and rich. It's been a long time since I was looking, but back in the day, it quickly became apparent that the combo of gorgeous + rich was not a good one. Men who were both were inevitably quite full of themselves.


150 posted on 02/08/2007 11:18:03 PM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert (Kelo must GO!! ..... http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

You can't walk on him if he's too perfect. They need somebody with a few 'holes' in him so they can rip some more.


151 posted on 02/09/2007 12:11:54 AM PST by Bon mots (What does 24,000 gallons of jet fuel cost?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krunkygirl
Yes, in Japan. I came here for the Crunky...

Had I signed up to FR after coming to Japan, my nickname would have been crunkyboy.

152 posted on 02/09/2007 12:41:25 AM PST by OwenKellogg (Owen Newt Kellogg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
How sad. I hope as time passes your memories of other women will fade away and you will come to appreciate your wife for the gift that she is. She deserves better than to be considered 2nd (or 3rd) best.

As with anything, there will always be something or someone better. Like interviewing job candidates, rarely to never do you come across the "perfect candidate". Instead, you collect resumes, filter them, bring in candidates for an interview and then extend an offer to the "best available".

Sometimes, a "best available" will come along who stands out from all the other "best availables". For some reason, they tend to get away. Perhaps my sincerity in communicating to them comes across as fake flattery. I'm not sure but there's something about me that I still don't fully understand.

153 posted on 02/09/2007 7:00:12 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: paulat; krunkygirl
I want my very own Newt. ...just don't get cancer, honey....

OUCH!

154 posted on 02/09/2007 7:03:13 AM PST by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg

Let's see: Owen Newt "crunkyboy" Kellogg...that's getting to be a mighty long handle ;)

Now, Owen, when you come stateside bring a Crunky bar with you. Perhaps we'll share it a`la the Snickers Super Bowl ad...with a twist...you being a crunkyboy and me being a krunkygirl, there won't be any of the "ick factor"!

Yum yum! chocolate almond, mmmmmm!


155 posted on 02/09/2007 7:06:43 AM PST by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; paulat

Oh, poo, I'm going to let Newt 'splain that to me himself.

I don't believe the media spin.


156 posted on 02/09/2007 7:08:13 AM PST by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
Women may say that because they don't want to seem shallow, desperate, grasping, and (worst of all) inferior. Saying they aspire to the man who "has it all" goes against 50+ years of feminist indoctrination. When it comes to people in general, watch what they do--not what they say.

Yes, I think you detected a flaw in this study. The study should have asked single unattached females to choose which male they would select for a chance at a "real" date. They should have been informed that all these men were looking for a serious relationship leading to marriage. Then interested women could fill out a ticket for their choice. All choices for a particular man would be put in a drum and a winner selected at random. The winning ticket would get a "real" date with the man. You could then count up the tickets for each man and get a feel for what women want. JMHO.

157 posted on 02/09/2007 7:27:15 AM PST by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

I have no problem admitting you are wrong. :?


158 posted on 02/09/2007 7:51:05 AM PST by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

The 89 Taurus has 400 thousand on it. I put in a MP3 player and I have trouble keeping the speedometer from pegging out with the right music. It omly goes to 85 on the dial. Love that car.


159 posted on 02/09/2007 9:11:19 AM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: fso301

"As with anything, there will always be something or someone better. Like interviewing job candidates, rarely to never do you come across the "perfect candidate". Instead, you collect resumes, filter them, bring in candidates for an interview and then extend an offer to the "best available"."

I appreciate your honesty, but again I have to think "how sad". The mindset that one would keep comparing one individual against others as if they are a commodity is foreign to me.
I too had "loves" previous to my husband.
At the time I thought they were "it" - and one them particularly broke my heart.
But looking back I can see that things happen for a reason, and when people are meant to be together, then they stay together.
When they drift apart - there is a darn good reason for it.

I don't compare my husband to them - every person is unique with their own God-given beauty and should be appreciated as such.
My exes wound up with partners better suited for them - and I wound up with the man best suited for me.
He is the best gift ever given to me and I hope I never take it for granted.


"Sometimes, a "best available" will come along who stands out from all the other "best availables". "

You do understand, don't you? That if you told your wife she was "best available" chances are she would be heartbroken?
Would you want to be considered "best available"?
Would you stand for it?

If I thought I was considered "best available" I would leave.


160 posted on 02/09/2007 9:33:25 AM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson