Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2007 12:58:11 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: aculeus

bump


2 posted on 02/08/2007 12:59:47 PM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

Bookmark to see what I can learn from FReeper engineers and scientists.


3 posted on 02/08/2007 1:01:46 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

---ah so--from the hydrogen hoax to the ethanol hoax---


4 posted on 02/08/2007 1:01:50 PM PST by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

Zubrin has had a remarkable insight at least once. He better stay on the Mars campaign trail since that project is flagging.


5 posted on 02/08/2007 1:01:51 PM PST by RightWhale (300 miles north of Big Wild Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shuttle Shucker; KevinDavis; Red Badger

Hydrogen ping


6 posted on 02/08/2007 1:04:20 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave; sully777; Fierce Allegiance; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; ..

Hydrogen Fuel PING!......


7 posted on 02/08/2007 1:06:14 PM PST by Red Badger (Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
If you want to get plentiful unbound hydrogen, the closest place it can be found is on the surface of the Sun; mining this hydrogen supply would be quite a trick.

We would have to work at night. ;o)

8 posted on 02/08/2007 1:07:13 PM PST by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

Yes. The science in this article is accurate. Essentially all the hydrogen is combined with oxygen in water.
Separating the two takes energy, more energy than is obtained when the hydrogen and oxygen are recombined in the burning process.

There is no easy solution to the energy problem. Whatever the solution is, I don't know of any politician able to say anything sensible about the subject. Eventually the free market will solve the problem.


10 posted on 02/08/2007 1:13:35 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

A paerfect example of lying with the truth.

Small, safer, boilerplate nuclear
plants, designed for the task,
can produce hydrogen in abundant
supply, without breaking a sweat.


11 posted on 02/08/2007 1:15:24 PM PST by NickatNite2003 (From the Man from Hope" to the wife who snarls "Abandon All Hope!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
What is needed is government action to break the vertical monopoly on the automobile fuel supply currently held by the petroleum cartel.

And this guy accuses others of being charlatans? LOL. What a crock. Yes, there's a petroleum cartel, but it's not a virtical monoply. The only thing that has been cartelized has been crude production (OPEC). The refining and distribution businesses are highly competitive. This guy needs to study some economics.

This could most efficiently be done simply by mandating that all new cars—whether of foreign or domestic manufacture—sold in the United States be “flex-fueled.”

This idiot is pushing ethanol? Obviously his skills for identifying hoaxes aren't very good.

13 posted on 02/08/2007 1:17:36 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

We'll have to use vegetable oil....


14 posted on 02/08/2007 1:17:47 PM PST by Irish_Thatcherite (Apathy is one of the most dangerous ideologies in existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
The whale oil salesmen talking about how crude oil will never be better than whale oil.

The laughing crowd says man will never fly.

It's impossible for man to reach the moon, too, didn't you hear?
15 posted on 02/08/2007 1:17:57 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

Hydrogen would work as a fuel IF the government subsidized a nation-wide network of monorails!

Also, has anyone considered re-visiting Swift's idea of distilling sunbeams from cucumbers - that would be a great cottage industry!

Surely, the US government can afford to invest a few paltry dollars pried from the grasping fingers of Republicans to save planet Earth and all who sail on her!

uh.../sarc.


17 posted on 02/08/2007 1:20:11 PM PST by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

bump


20 posted on 02/08/2007 1:22:17 PM PST by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

ALL LIES! We don't have hydrogen because of Bush & Cheney! Ok, I'm kidding. Interesteing science stuff


22 posted on 02/08/2007 1:23:06 PM PST by StoneColdTaxHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

later bump


27 posted on 02/08/2007 1:28:29 PM PST by Edgerunner (Better RED state than DEAD state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

Actually, Bush & co. have been in contact with a time traveler from the future who has explained to them how it and other things can easily and cheaply be done. Believe that? Good as globle warming I hear. Oh, he explained that too. Says, algorejr is a hopeless nut.


31 posted on 02/08/2007 1:35:57 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Hydrogen, therefore, is not a source of energy. It simply is a carrier of energy.

Yeah, but if we're to get rid of gasoline, an energy carrier the one thing we really need. We already have ways of generating large amounts of relatively cheap energy (fission). We don't have good ways of running cars with it, however. Hydrogen is not as good as gasoline, true, but it has the potential for much denser energy storage than chemical batteries.

Ethanol is a more practical fuel for vehicles than hydrogen is right now, but I think the problems with hydrogen are more likely to yield to technological advances. Give it ten years of serious effort, then we'll see.

36 posted on 02/08/2007 1:43:48 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Bump
To read later
43 posted on 02/08/2007 1:48:24 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus

BTTT


45 posted on 02/08/2007 1:53:57 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson