Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy on gun control: "You've got to REGULATE consistent with the Second Amendment"
FOX News ^ | Feb 6, 2007 | Hanity and Colmes

Posted on 02/07/2007 2:40:44 PM PST by Jim Robinson

HANNITY: Let me move on. And the issue of guns has come up a lot. When people talk about Mayor Giuliani, New York City had some of the toughest gun laws in the entire country. Do you support the right of people to carry handguns?

GIULIANI: I understand the Second Amendment. I support it. People have the right to bear arms. When I was mayor of New York, I took over at a very, very difficult time. We were averaging about 2,000 murders a year, 10,000...

HANNITY: You inherited those laws, the gun laws in New York?

GIULIANI: Yes, and I used them. I used them to help bring down homicide. We reduced homicide, I think, by 65-70 percent. And some of it was by taking guns out of the streets of New York City.

So if you're talking about a city like New York, a densely populated area like New York, I think it's appropriate. You might have different laws other places, and maybe a lot of this gets resolved based on different states, different communities making decisions. After all, we do have a federal system of government in which you have the ability to accomplish that.

HANNITY: So you would support the state's rights to choose on specific gun laws?

GIULIANI: Yes, I mean, a place like New York that is densely populated, or maybe a place that is experiencing a serious crime problem, like a few cities are now, kind of coming back, thank goodness not New York, but some other cities, maybe you have one solution there and in another place, more rural, more suburban, other issues, you have a different set of rules.

HANNITY: But generally speaking, do you think it's acceptable if citizens have the right to carry a handgun?

GIULIANI: It's not only -- I mean, it's part of the Constitution. People have the right to bear arms. Then the restrictions of it have to be reasonable and sensible. You can't just remove that right. You've got to regulate, consistent with the Second Amendment.

HANNITY: How do you feel about the Brady bill and assault ban?

GIULIANI: I was in favor of that as part of the crime bill. I was in favor of it because I thought that it was necessary both to get the crime bill passed and also necessary with the 2,000 murders or so that we were looking at, 1,800, 1,900, to 2,000 murders, that I could use that in a tactical way to reduce crime. And I did.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; bang; banglist; electionpresident; elections; giulian; giuliani; gop; guncontrol; leo; regulatethis; republicans; rkba; rudygiulian; rudyonguns; rudytranscript; voteduncanhunter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,501-1,511 next last
To: Dog Gone
Our own silence can and will be used against us.

Maybe. Just make sure you keep it locked & loaded.

661 posted on 02/07/2007 6:40:28 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; EternalVigilance

Wow!! Then why did you appear to be so pro-Rudy? I thought you were after Eternal Vigilance who (I could be mistaken??) is also pro-conservative Duncan Hunter. Ok, time to go back and re-read!


662 posted on 02/07/2007 6:41:04 PM PST by ozarkgirl (Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Great points. Rudy is definitely not a red stater

Heck, he was polling BEHIND HILLARY in the 2000 NYC Senate race when he withdrew.

Yet his supporters tell us he's the one to beat the Hildabeast?

I'd be better off betting on the Washington Generals against the spread.

663 posted on 02/07/2007 6:42:26 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
" But redneck as in Huron, an interesting characterization. If a Republican politician said that, they'd get hung."

Well, I'm a conservative Republican, who happens to be American native ( American comes first for me) Huron with some Scottish blood mixed in.

Neither the Scot or Huron in me cares much for any puke running for office that wants to try to disarm me or limit my rights.
664 posted on 02/07/2007 6:42:37 PM PST by Beagle8U (Fred Thompson......Your party needs you !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Would you trust any of them with your life?


665 posted on 02/07/2007 6:42:40 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Giuliani is a phoney, an egotist and liar.

I don't know that he's a liar. I think he's rather brazenly signaling that he's going to stuff a social liberal, anti-Second Amendment agenda down our throats.

666 posted on 02/07/2007 6:43:28 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

I have the same problem.


667 posted on 02/07/2007 6:43:42 PM PST by Stonewall Jackson (I see storms on the horizon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Hildy
I think some of these people are insane. Literally.

And why is that? Because they don't agree with you?

Some friendly advice: you might want to get your emotions under wraps. You both seem a bit brittle.

668 posted on 02/07/2007 6:44:23 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

LOL regarding the pictures.

I do have a question. As someone who has been on a lot of Rudy thread, I didn't get your comment about Rudy's connections to the Middle East. What am I missing?


669 posted on 02/07/2007 6:44:46 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150
How do we keep firearms out of the hands of convicted felons...

If it's a non-violent felony, we shouldn't.

Cheating on your income taxes is a felony. Should someone lose their freedom to maintain the means to protect themselves against someone bigger and meaner because they falsified an income-tax return?

670 posted on 02/07/2007 6:44:50 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

And I meant to say, I like our field too.


671 posted on 02/07/2007 6:45:04 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It's sad to see Sean jeopardize his credibility by aligning with a pro-abortion, open borders, gay loving gun grabber in his Stop Hillary campaign.


672 posted on 02/07/2007 6:46:16 PM PST by Nephi (Open borders is the other side of the globalist free trade coin. W and Rudy are globalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles; EternalVigilance
I think he's rather brazenly signaling that he's going to stuff a social liberal, anti-Second Amendment agenda down our throats.

Well, I think he can be both. He can be brazen, and then he can claim he will appoint strict constructionists when he appointed upwards of two pubbies out of sixty judicial appointments as mayor of NYC.

Don't underestimate Rudy. He can multitask against the interests of the base.

673 posted on 02/07/2007 6:46:23 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
It's sad to see Sean jeopardize his credibility by aligning with a pro-abortion, open borders, gay loving gun grabber in his Stop Hillary campaign.

Makes you wonder just how sincere Sean's reporting along the border was.

674 posted on 02/07/2007 6:47:07 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

The dreaded 666 post. :-)


675 posted on 02/07/2007 6:47:39 PM PST by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I'm still opposed to slandering Rudy, and he's still my last Republican choice.

I'm against slandering him, but what about the truth? After all he is running for President of the United States.
676 posted on 02/07/2007 6:48:47 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: pissant; Peach
Did someone say California and concealed carry? We discussed terrorism earlier. A favorite quote.

Because less than twenty years ago I was the target of a terrorist group...I know the sense of helplessness that people feel. I know the urge to arm yourself because that's what I did. I was trained in firearms...I carried a concealed weapon. I made the determination that if somebody was going to try to take me out, I was going to take them with me."
Senator Dianne Feinstein

I guess Senators have the right to bear arms to protect themselves.

And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms


677 posted on 02/07/2007 6:49:05 PM PST by SJackson (Let a thousand flowers bloom and let all our rifles be aimed at the occupation, Abu Mazen 1/11/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
I think that pretty much takes care of the "the bill of rights only restricts the federal government" line of argument, don't you?

Are you trying to be stupid on purpose? The interpretation of the Supreme Court is that the 14th Amendment "incorporates" the restrictions of the federal government onto the individual state governments depending on case law. That's a different argument than arguing how those restrictions applied prior to the 14th's passage. It is also different depending on which amendments have received the "incorporation" blessing from the Supreme Court.

The passage you cited about "the supreme Law of the Land" has no bearing on whether or not an amendment is "incorporated" by the USSC.

678 posted on 02/07/2007 6:49:17 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: freemike

Hillary would galvanize Republicans, Rudy would give us more of '92 & '06.


679 posted on 02/07/2007 6:50:01 PM PST by Nephi (Open borders is the other side of the globalist free trade coin. W and Rudy are globalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Rudy can outwordsmith Bill Clinton, too. As I've studied Rudy's various statements I have seen escape holes in the text large enough to drag an 18-wheeler through.


680 posted on 02/07/2007 6:50:58 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,501-1,511 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson