Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toward a 21st Century Contract with America
Newt.org ^ | February 1, 2007 | Newt Gingrich

Posted on 02/04/2007 10:33:24 PM PST by Jim Robinson

GulfCoastNews.com February 1 2007

In 1994, the Republicans gained a majority in Congress for the first time in 40 years by offering a set of reforms contained in the Contract with America. Those common sense reforms cleaned up the way the House did its business including making Congress subject to the very laws it passes where they had routinely exempted themselves before. It also contained the first tax cuts in 16 years and provided for the child tax credit we have today. It increased intelligence and defense spending. The Contract led to the first balanced budget in a generation by actually cutting spending in real terms that created surpluses used to pay down the national debt. Of all the reforms, however, the most positive and powerful change for America was welfare reform which moved people off of welfare and into work or school.

In the 1996 election, when the Republican Party was reelected to the majority for the first time since 1928, we knew we had the approval of the American people. It would be hard to argue that the Contract with America was anything but a great success.

However, today we face even greater challenges than the ones we dealt with in 1994, and many of those challenges are indeed a threat to our survival.

In a rapidly changing world with new threats and new competitors, we must implement policies that will ensure America’s leadership, safety, and prosperity. And we must reinvigorate the core values that have made America an exceptional civilization.

The traditional instruments of government will not reform themselves fast enough and thoroughly enough for the information age.

The entrenched lobbyists and bureaucracies will do all they can to minimize the changes no matter how vital those changes are to America’s future. Self interest has and will continue to dominate the national interest if the normal political system operates in its business as usual style. The pressure of daily events will keep both the news media and most politicians focused on the immediate and the trivial rather than the long-term and the profoundly important.

Only a grassroots citizens’ movement can insist on the level of change that is needed for our children and grandchildren to have a successful future. Real change requires real change.

What is needed today more than in 1994 is a comprehensive set of solutions for the 21st Century. We must fight to win the future for the next generation of Americans with the same intensity previous generations fought for ours. We need a generation of solutions big enough to ensure the future for our children and grandchildren. I wrote Winning the Future to begin to chart a path toward meeting the challenges we face and to offer an outline of a 21st Century Contract with America.

Outline of a 21st Century Contract with America

I. To keep Americans safe both home and abroad, we will defend America and her allies from those who would destroy us. To achieve this, we will develop the intelligence, diplomatic, information, defense, and homeland security systems and resources necessary to defeat our enemies and defend our shores.

II. Consistent with our founding document – the Declaration of Independence, we will seek to re-center America on the Creator from Whom all our liberties come. We will insist on a judiciary that understands the centrality of God in American history and reasserts the legitimacy of recognizing the Creator in public life.

III. To strengthen our American culture, we will establish patriotic education for our children and patriotic immigration for new Americans. To achieve this, we will renew our commitment to education about American citizenship based on American history and an understanding of the Founding Fathers and the core values of American civilization. We will insist that both our children and immigrants learn the key values and key facts of American history as the foundation of their growth as citizens. And we will make English the official language of government to ensure a unified American culture.

IV. To meet the triple economic challenges of an explosion in scientific and technological knowledge, an increasingly competitive world market, and the rise of China and India we will implement:

1. A dramatically simplified tax code that favors savings, entrepreneurship, investment, and constant modernization of equipment and technology.

2. Investment in the scientific revolutions that are going to transform our world—particularly in energy, space, and the environment.

3. Math and science learning equal to any in the world and educating enough young Americans to both discover the science of the future and to compete successfully in national security and the economy with other well-educated societies.

4. Transform health care into a 21st Century Intelligent Health System that improves our health while lowering costs dramatically. In the process, American health care will become our highest value export and foreign exchange earning sector.

5. A new system of civil justice to reduce the burden of lawsuits.

V. To ensure that no American retires into poverty, we will transform the Social Security system starting with younger workers who should have the right to choose a personal Social Security Savings Retirement Accounts that will enable them to accumulate the wealth needed for a prosperous retirement while preserving Social Security for today’s retirees and near-retirees.

VI. In order to permit every American the opportunity to pursue happiness their entire life, we will:

1. Develop a system in which those who wish to stay economically active are encouraged and incentivized to do so because active people live longer and healthier and have a greater opportunity to pursue happiness;

2. Develop a system of independent living and assisted living that increases the years in which people can be on their own and in most cases enables people to live their entire lives with freedom and dignity;

3. Develop a new model of quality long-term care in which both the care and the quality of life are compatible with a twenty-first century American expectation of progress and innovation.

4. Use the new technologies and new scientific knowledge to turn disabilities into capabilities and change government regulations and programs to help every American achieve the fullest possible ability to pursue happiness.

VII. To change the mindset of big government in Washington, we will insist upon replacing bureaucratic public administration with entrepreneurial public management so government can operate with the speed, effectiveness, and efficiency of the information age.

VIII. To balance the federal budget, we will insist on the economic policies that foster a lean government, low taxes, and a low interest rate economy to maximize growth in a competitive world.

IX. To create a citizen-centered government, we will insist on congressional reform including the repeal of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance censorship law to make the legislative branch responsive to its voters and not Washington’s entrenched special interests.

X. To protect and ensure the integrity of the election process, we will insist that it is honest, accountable, accurate, and free from the threat of illegal votes or gratuitous litigation.

There is a lot to be done and every American can play an active role in winning the future for the next generation. I invite you to become involved and share your ideas for solutions to our great challenges by visiting and joining American Solutions for Winning the Future. (www.americansolutions.com)

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is author of Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract with America and chairman of American Solutions for Winning the Future.

Editor's Note: GCN requested an article by Gingrich for our readers on the subject of a new Contract for America. Gingrich was largely the architect of the first Contract for America in the 1990's when he was in Congress. He was kind enough to respond with the article above.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; elections; grassroots; mccainfeingold; newt; newtgingrich; republicanparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: Jim Robinson; WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

BFLR. PING!


101 posted on 02/05/2007 6:40:19 AM PST by cgk (Republicanism didn't make Conservatives a majority. Conservatism made Republicans a majority. [NEWT])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Does he seriously want the Feds involved in our retirement homes more than they already are? Geez, that's downright frightening.

I don't think that's really what he's proposing. I think he's proposing some changes to Social Security to incentivize people who are so inclined to work later in life.

102 posted on 02/05/2007 6:40:30 AM PST by B Knotts (Newt '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
I was referring to this section:

2. Develop a system of independent living and assisted living that increases the years in which people can be on their own and in most cases enables people to live their entire lives with freedom and dignity;

The last thing I want is the Feds doing any more assisting in my life.

L

103 posted on 02/05/2007 6:57:29 AM PST by Lurker (Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I agree. But he doesn't actually say he wants a federal program for that. But, yeah...it's not really a matter for the federal government, and we need to keep the feds (and government at all levels, for that matter) from interfering in any more areas of our lives.


104 posted on 02/05/2007 7:00:39 AM PST by B Knotts (Newt '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Here's my answer:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

( Article I of the Amendments to the US Constitution. )


105 posted on 02/05/2007 7:13:14 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Interesting, isn't it?


106 posted on 02/05/2007 7:14:01 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

What, you don't want a civil servant dropping by to make sure you've taken the correct pills and are keeping their property up the way they want you to?

Troublemaking ingrate!


107 posted on 02/05/2007 7:16:20 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Troublemaking ingrate!

I wonder how that would look on a T-shirt.

Have a good day. I'm off to bed.

Stay warm.

L

108 posted on 02/05/2007 7:20:14 AM PST by Lurker (Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Stay warm!


109 posted on 02/05/2007 7:25:38 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Excellent! Kudos!


110 posted on 02/05/2007 8:33:54 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

A friend of mine, Ray harbin, was deeply disapointed by Newt being a closet Greenie. Ray met Newt when he was a member of the same river board in the Atlanta area.

Under Newt, not one bill attempting to reform (much less 'sunset') the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was allowed onto the floor.

For those who have not followed the adverse impacts of the
ESA, please note that ESA is the justification of the nationalization of land ownership throughout America. Just as an example, Florida has already socialized 15,000 square miles of its approx. 60,000 square miles of land.

Please note that Newt has included health care and "the environment" in his wish list. Green once, Green always. And, Newt is green.

Newt, and the Republican Revolution, was a good idea that was never actualized. And, it propbably won't be if Newt is involved.


America can do better. America must do better, and very quickly - before the nexus of events from the Chinese and/or Muslim challenge, the results of generations of deliberate public school education system dumbing down, and the prevasve Marxism of the Academented, overwhelms what is left of the American culture.

I left the Mexiforming of America to the last, because if we do not remain true to the Founding Documents, not one of which is copied in any way in the Mexican "way of life", we are also doomed to the dust bin of history.

Better that any of a number of FReeper occupy the Oval Office than Newtie Kazootie.


111 posted on 02/05/2007 8:35:53 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principles, - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Here's my answer:

That it an answer. But you didn't answer the question:

Would you feel uncomfortable being part of a political party whose platform calls for the return of prayer in schools, calls for more official religious involvement in government programs, calls for preserving the "sanctity" of life and opposing abortion for that reason, calls for the preservation of the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, and even mentions God, one of the teachings of Jesus Christ, and the power of prayer on its first page?

112 posted on 02/05/2007 8:37:00 AM PST by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

I gave you my answer; I support the First Amendment, word for word.

And I won't support any party that wants to change the First Amendment.


113 posted on 02/05/2007 8:38:35 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
And I won't support any party that wants to change the First Amendment.

Do you support a political party that states and believes in the things that I described?

114 posted on 02/05/2007 8:41:26 AM PST by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Is this the Inquisition?

I've read the platform, dimbulb.

I don't know what your point is, as usual.


115 posted on 02/05/2007 8:59:34 AM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

~ ping ~


116 posted on 02/05/2007 10:56:30 AM PST by b9 ("America is great because America is good." ~ Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I like Newt's outline and his ambitious proposals. I would like to see a FR poll to gauge member and non member support.
117 posted on 02/05/2007 11:15:29 AM PST by afnamvet (It is what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Great set of ideals. Glad Newt is putting these out for public discussion and seeking solutions to help attain them. The next president may be the candidate that has the best organization interacting with the public, not simply sharing a message. The site, www.americansolutions.com may push Newt to the forefront as a presidential candidate.
118 posted on 02/05/2007 11:23:54 AM PST by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"I hestiate on II because I just am not comfortable with trying to legislate religion in any way, shape, or form."

I understand your hesitation. Most Americans are not old enough to remember when government legislated religion. It has only been since 1943 that states have been stripped of this right through a series of Supreme Court rulings. In extending the prohibitions placed upon Congress in the First Amendment to the states, the Supreme Court created a moral vacuum.

Although legislating religion seems troublesome, there is no history of states abusing this right in the first 150+ years of our nation. Lacking this we have a federal government very active in attacking religion.
119 posted on 02/05/2007 11:45:48 AM PST by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I agree with you 100% Jim! We've discussed this so you know my thoughts on this. Government once had the right to legislate religion, speech, press and assembly, but it was state governments as the First Amendment only restricted the federal government (Congress) from making such laws.

The First Amendment must be restored as written if the nation is to regain morals. During our lifetimes, we seen states prohibited from tackling flag burning as a form of protest, obscenity laced speech, pornography, prayer in public school, non-citizens protesting against our nation on our streets, and a slew of other social issues the states could once legislate.
120 posted on 02/05/2007 12:02:24 PM PST by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson