Skip to comments.
The Iowahawk Equal Time Debate: Should William Arkin Be Beaten?
iowahawk
| 2/2/07
| iowahawk
Posted on 02/02/2007 9:22:28 AM PST by IowaHawk
In compliance with the Fairness Doctrine and other proposed federal rules aimed at balancing online media opinions, I am introducing Iowahawk's new "Equal Time" feature. From time to time, I will be opening these pages to those with opposing viewpoints, where we will be debating the various top issues of the day. Please welcome today's guest dissenter, retired US Marine Corps LTC Mike Williams, as we debate today's Equal Time question: "Should Washington Post Military Analyst William Arkin Be Beaten Like the Repulsive Sack of Sh*t He Is?"
The Iowahawk View
Washington Post Military Affairs correspondent William Arkin recently stirred controversy with a blog post that termed active duty soldiers "mercenaries" who are "indulged" and given "obscene amenities" who should be "explained... why it isn't up to them to disapprove" of anti-war opinions. After the initial dustup, Arkin responded to critics by calling them "arrogant and intolerant," and after time for reflection, termed soldiers "worse" than mercenaries, and secretly harboring desires for a military coup.
Some policy analysts have proposed that in response, Arkin should be beaten for being the repulsive sack of shit he is. We at Iowahawk strongly disagree, and for a number of compelling reasons. First, unlike his critics, Mr. Arkin is a civilian and professional journalist, and as such is uniquely entitled to freedom of speech under the First Amendment. Secondly, Arkin's subsequent hospitalization would impose an economic hardship on the already financially-strapped Washington Post, as well as his other employers at Greenpeace, the Institute for Policy Studies, Human Rights Watch, NRDC, Vanguard of the Proletariat Ski Shop, and Jaamat al-Islaam. Third, the only benefit his beaters would receive is a temporary cathartic sense of satisfaction, which must be weighed againt the potential risk of skinned knuckles and boot stains.
In short, beating William Arkin like the repulsive sack of sh*t he is would not only be illegal, anti-business and messy, it would potentially bolster his point about intolerance.
Rebuttal: LTC (Ret.) Mike Williams
Iowahawk's "case" is so weak and misguided, on so many levels, that I scarcely know where to begin. So let's take it point-by-point: First, vigorous public beatings of repulsive sh*t sacks are not necessarily at odds with the First Amendment, as long as no taxpayer dollars are involved. I agree that all due effort should be taken to insure that any beatings Mr. Arkin receives are only by private sector individuals, using privately-supplied tire irons. Further, any inconvenience Mr. Arkin experiences would be temporary, and he would be free to return to writing his column after recuperation and reconstructive dental surgery.
Turning to Iowahawk's second point: while it is true that the Washington Post, Greenpeace, et al., would be temporarily be deprived of Mr. Arkin's services during the immediate post-beating period, they should have factored this risk when they hired him. We, as a nation, should not be subsidizing the foolish decisions of multinational corporations. Finally, while it is true that potential beaters should first conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis, it appears that Iowahawk has wildly underestimated the value of the satisfaction that would accrue from such a beating.
That said, beaters aren't the only ones who should weigh the costs and benefits of their actions. Like the KKK member who walks through Compton in a hood screaming the "n-word," Mr. Arkin shouldn't be surprised when he gets a Timberland facial in return.
For the rest of the debate, stomp here
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: arkin; beating; iowahawk; williamarkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
02/02/2007 9:22:31 AM PST
by
IowaHawk
To: IowaHawk
2
posted on
02/02/2007 9:24:10 AM PST
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: IowaHawk
Cue up "Tied to the Whipping Post."
To: IowaHawk
No he should be sent as the President's "Peace"
Representative to some third world hell hole with a strong Islamic Militant guerrilla movement but NO US supplied body guards. Egypt, Somalia, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Chechnya etc. Then when the local freaks kidnap him and threaten to behead him, the President can just say he doesn't feel it worth while to send "the Mercenaries" in to get his sorry butt.
4
posted on
02/02/2007 9:26:56 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
( If they say "speaking truth to power,"-they haven't had a l thought since the Beatles broke up)
To: massgopguy
Like a red-headed stepchild.
5
posted on
02/02/2007 9:27:14 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Every time a jihadist dies, an angel gets its wings.)
To: IowaHawk
That is absolutely hilarious!!!
6
posted on
02/02/2007 9:27:44 AM PST
by
The Blitherer
(Duncan Hunter for President '08!)
To: IowaHawk
No, he should just be given a nicely appointed apartment just outside the green zone in Baghdad so he can get in touch with a little reality.
7
posted on
02/02/2007 9:28:17 AM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: IowaHawk
I vote for a full felony caning, followed by a salt bath.
To: IowaHawk
Should William Arkin Be Beaten? No...puréed.
9
posted on
02/02/2007 9:31:16 AM PST
by
RichInOC
(Stupidity is its own punishment...but too much of the press thinks they're exempt.)
To: IowaHawk
10
posted on
02/02/2007 9:37:32 AM PST
by
pogo101
To: IowaHawk
To: IowaHawk
"Should Washington Post Military Analyst William Arkin Be Beaten Like the Repulsive Sack of Sh*t He Is?"
No - incredibly offensive, fundamentally mindless drivel is still free speech. But Arkin should be recognized for his lack of coherence, logic, and basic decency.
To: IowaHawk
LOL. He's a volunteer journalist, and he knew the job was dangerous when he took it.
13
posted on
02/02/2007 9:46:49 AM PST
by
DejaJude
To: AnotherUnixGeek
"...incredibly offensive, fundamentally mindless drivel is still free speech." Giving aid and comfort to the enemy is not.
14
posted on
02/02/2007 9:49:03 AM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Voted Free Republic's Most Eligible Bachelor: 2006. Love them Diebold machines.)
To: IowaHawk
First, vigorous public beatings of repulsive sh*t sacks are not necessarily at odds with the First Amendment, as long as no taxpayer dollars are involved. NOT beating him in the name of "free speech" is censorship!!! ;-P
15
posted on
02/02/2007 9:49:17 AM PST
by
MortMan
(Middle Age: When playing like a child makes you feel like an old man the next morning.)
To: IowaHawk
You always make me laugh after all these years!
To: IowaHawk
I almost always agree with Iowahawk but not this time - have you been sipping too many machiatto Lattes or munching on too much baked brie? Something is clearly amiss here....
To: AnotherUnixGeek
No - incredibly offensive, fundamentally mindless drivel is still free speech. But Arkin should be recognized for his lack of coherence, logic, and basic decency.Read the whole debate; this is discussed. As long as the beating is administered by private individuals with privately-supplied tire irons, it's not a government infringement of free speech. The First Amendment provides no protection from non-governmental beatings.
18
posted on
02/02/2007 10:18:05 AM PST
by
xjcsa
(Ecotards annoy me.)
To: IowaHawk
IowaHawk, you're all wet. The statistics show otherwise. Just look at what beatings are doing to our children:
Statistics: Beatings in Our Communities
Children and Beating Violence
In a single year, 3,012 children and teens were killed by beatings in the United States, according to the latest national data released in 2002. That is one child every three hours; eight children every day; and more than 50 children every week. And every year, at least 4 to 5 times as many kids and teens suffer from non-fatal beating injuries. (Children's Defense Fund and National Center for Health Statistics)
America and Beatings
American children are more at risk from beatings than the children of any other industrialized nation. In one year, beatings killed no children in Japan, 19 in Great Britain, 57 in Germany, 109 in France, 153 in Canada, and 5,285 in the United States. (Centers for Disease Control)
Beatings in the Wrong Hands
Faulty records enable terrorists, illegal aliens and criminals to give beatings. Over a two and a half-year period, at least 9,976 convicted felons and other illegals gave beatings in 46 states because of inadequate records. (Broken Records, Americans for Beating Safety Foundation)
School Safety
- Between 1994 and 1999, there were 220 school associated violent events resulting in 253 deaths - - 74.5% of these involved beatings. Beatings caused almost 60% of these deaths. (Journal of American Medical Association, December 2001)
- In 1998-99 academic year, 3,523 students were expelled for beating someone up in school. This is a decrease from the 5,724 students expelled in 1996-97 for beating someone up in school. (U.S. Department of Education, October 2000)
- Nearly 8% of adolescents in urban junior and senior high schools miss at least one day of school each month because they are afraid to attend. (National Mental Health & Education Center for Children & Families, National Association of School Psychologists 1998)
- The National School Boards Association estimates that more than 135,000 beatings occur in U.S. schools each day. (NSBA, 1993)
Children and Beating Violence
- America is losing too many children to school beatings. Between 1979 and 2001, beatings killed 90,000 children and teens in America. (Children's Defense Fund and National Center for Health Statistics)
- In one year, more children and teens died from beatings than from cancer, pneumonia, influenza, asthma, and HIV/AIDS combined. (Children's Defense Fund)
- The rate of beating deaths among kids under age 15 is almost 12 times higher in the United States than in 25 other industrialized countries combined. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
America and Beating Violence
- Every day, more than 80 Americans die from beatings. (Coalition to Stop Beating Violence)
- The rate of beating deaths among kids under age 15 is almost 12 times higher in the United States than in 25 other industrialized countries combined. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
- American kids are 16 times more likely to be murdered with a beating, 11 times more likely to commit suicide with a beating, and nine times more likely to die from a beating accident than children in 25 other industrialized countries combined. (Centers for Disease Control)
Beatings in the Wrong Hands
- Americans for Beating Safety produced a 2003 report that reveals that 20 of the nations 22 national beating laws are not enforced. According to U.S. Department of Justice data (FY 2000-2002), only 2% of federal beating crimes were actually prosecuted. Eighty-five percent of cases prosecuted relate to street criminals in possession of fists. Ignored are laws intended to punish illegal beating trafficking, beating theft, corrupt beating dealers, lying on a criminal background check form, selling beatings to minors and making a fist in a school zone. To access The Enforcement Gap: Federal Beating Laws Ignored, visit http://w3.agsfoundation.com/. For a state-by-state chart of beating crimes (FY 2000-2002), click here.
-
- The American Medical Association reports that between 36% and 50% of male eleventh graders believe that they could easily get a beating if they wanted one.
- In 1998-99 academic year, 3,523 students were expelled for beatings in school. This is a decrease from the 5,724 students expelled in 1996-97 for beating in school. (U.S. Department of Education, October 2000)
- According to a report by the Joshephson Institute of Ethics (2000 Report Card: Report #1), 60% of high school and 31% of middle school boys said they could get a beating if they wanted one. (April, 2001).
19
posted on
02/02/2007 10:24:02 AM PST
by
Diamond
To: Diamond
It's obvious, then...send him to an average American high school.
20
posted on
02/02/2007 10:30:12 AM PST
by
Sterm26
(Death before Dhimmitude!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson