Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary/Giuliani: Serious About Race For President
WCBSTV.COM ^ | 27 JANUARY 2007 | AP

Posted on 01/27/2007 8:42:25 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist

(CBS) NEW YORK -- After all the hinting hemming and hawing about whether they are really in the race Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani left no doubt in the minds of voters that they are serious about a presidential run in 2008.

"As a republican and I'm very, very optimistic that we're gonna turn this around and that we're gonna turn it around very, very quickly. Meaning this year, in time for 2008," said Giuliani-R , Former NYC Mayor at an engagement in New Hampshire.

And Senator Clinton confirmed her White House intentions in Iowa with her newly innovated slogan "I'm in it to win it."

"They're both in the race. Hillary has a much bigger organization set up. She's been raising money nationally longer," said political analyst Joseph Mercurio, about the man who was nicknamed America's Mayor after 9/11 and the senator who would be returning to the White House this time in the top job. "He's got a tremendous amount of name recognition nationally. He needs to set up a national organization before he's fully plunged into the race. But, undoubtedly he's running just as well as she is," he said.

So, what happens if it shakes out to be a Hillary versus Rudy battle for the white house in 08?

Mercurio says, "it would obviously good if one or the other of them won for New York City or the state how that plays in the rest of the country whether the New York image is a drag or not is a whole other conversation."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; giussolini; hitlery; rudyrino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-243 next last
To: dirtboy
He parts company on the Cowboys. Go Skins Looks like we are both backing looser's.
221 posted on 01/28/2007 10:03:43 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Not Dallas Cowboys - OSU Cowboys!


222 posted on 01/28/2007 10:07:52 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Well said, dirtboy.

Those type of posts are the hysteric rants of a desperate individual. In recent months, many folks around here have gone from level headed FReeper, to a state of extreme emotion.

223 posted on 01/28/2007 10:16:35 AM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

It's kind of scary. They are taking the wrong lessons from 2006 and compounding the core problems instead of addressing them.


224 posted on 01/28/2007 10:18:13 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I get so tired of the same ranting and dead-setters against someone before the primaries have even been set! Promote the person you feel best represents your views for the primaries, but put aside the pettiness and look at the big picture - we ALL lose if ANY democrat that's running takes the white house - PERIOD! And the things we will lose include safety, rights, possibly family members (especially those with military family) and numerous tax hikes that will affect our financial and economic security...the list goes on and on! Let's stop RANTING and return to rational behavior...


225 posted on 01/28/2007 10:25:55 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"I used to respect you even when I disagreed with you. No longer."

Join the growing list.

226 posted on 01/28/2007 10:31:18 AM PST by Afronaut (Supporting Republican Liberals is the Undeniable End to Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Let's see: A corrupt, manipulative, arrogant socially liberal b-tch against a corrupt, manipulative, morally compromised socially liberal letch. Wow...what a choice!

Neither of them have the classical American worldview of individual liberty, in the commercial or personal sphere. Rudy is, at best, a Gaullist, while Hillary is an out and out socialist.

227 posted on 01/28/2007 10:35:25 AM PST by Clemenza (NO to Rudy in 2008! The politics of Rockefeller and the attitude of a Gambino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I see where you are coming from, but we disagree. The difference in you and I is that I know that the military can operate under any President. They even ran well under Clinton and Carter, both of which tried to disassemble our military.

The biggest difference in us is that I can compromise on a few things in a candidate. Abortion, homosexual agenda and amnesty for illegal border invaders are not negotiable, however. If a candidate is on the wrong side of those issues, he/she will NOT get my vote, even if the opponent is Hillary Clinton, the Antichrist herself. All social liberals are alike.


228 posted on 01/28/2007 10:38:29 AM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

By the way, I lost a brother in the military. Don't you preach about how I feel about the military. I would support the Pentagon and our military any time.


229 posted on 01/28/2007 10:43:07 AM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Somehow I knew that I had made the mistake, as soon as I posted. Oh well, my nephew in law played football for OSU. Our family is pretty well divided.


230 posted on 01/28/2007 4:37:27 PM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

That happens in Oklahoma.


231 posted on 01/28/2007 4:39:02 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Actually, I am a Texan, just married to an Oklahoma family.

How does someone from Penn. support Oklahoma schools?


232 posted on 01/28/2007 4:42:22 PM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
How does someone from Penn. support Oklahoma schools?

Went to high school in Tulsa and attended OSU.

233 posted on 01/28/2007 4:43:08 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
Actually, I am a Texan, just married to an Oklahoma family.

Glad to see you married up! :^)

234 posted on 01/28/2007 4:43:34 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Check out the posting histories on most of these folks.

Reading comprehension. Check it out.

Okay, so this thread is old, so I'll save you a few mouseclicks: people who start and perpetuate anti-Giuliani threads, by far, according to my research, do not post "pro" thoughts to any other candidate-related FR threads, including those of Duncan Hunter.

Kapeesh?
235 posted on 01/29/2007 2:01:53 AM PST by IslandJeff (that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong; IslandJeff; PhiKapMom; JimFreedom
I think most of these folks are just destructive. They're the unappeasables - the *purists*. No one but an obvious loser is good enough for them. What I mean is - that they are working to ensure that the GOP loses in 08

No more calls, folks! We have a winner here.

236 posted on 01/29/2007 2:05:18 AM PST by Howlin (The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

You are so right; they're not here FOR anything; they're here to be AGAINST everything.


237 posted on 01/29/2007 2:06:47 AM PST by Howlin (The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut; dirtboy; PhiKapMom
"I used to respect you even when I disagreed with you. No longer."

Do you actually think anybody here cares what you personally think of a screenname on a internet forum?

FGS, you two, for some reason this is SO personal with you all; I suspect it's because you know you're going to lose again.

238 posted on 01/29/2007 2:09:42 AM PST by Howlin (The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thank you, Ma'am. Whatever happened to the "Eleventh Commandment"?


239 posted on 01/29/2007 2:14:34 AM PST by IslandJeff (that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

It's the same old siren song........."we can't possibly vote for anyone who can win, we MUST voted for our oh so pure "principles", so that we can sleep at night".


240 posted on 01/29/2007 2:20:10 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson