Skip to comments.
The Stars Align: Al Gore, Democrat Nominee
MND ^
| January 27, 2007
| Doug Powers
Posted on 01/27/2007 8:26:51 PM PST by Nasty McPhilthy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Gore is boring and a sore loser. I can't believe they would run him again.
2
posted on
01/27/2007 8:28:06 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (We are going to win!))
To: bnelson44
He'll get an academy award....and be all shiny and new!
3
posted on
01/27/2007 8:28:58 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(We need to cure Academentia)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
If we're stuck with a Democrat in 2008, better Gore than Hillary.
4
posted on
01/27/2007 8:31:19 PM PST
by
gonewt
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Richardson for the Dems is looking like a dark horse.
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Nasty McPhilthy
His daddy always promised he'd be president. He's entitled.
7
posted on
01/27/2007 8:34:11 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: bnelson44
Gore is boring and a sore loser. I can't believe they would run him again. If you're a liberal, history began this morning. And you can rewrite it however it suits you.
It's conceivable that the Democrats could convince themselves to back Franklin Delano Roosevelt for a fifth term.
8
posted on
01/27/2007 8:35:57 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: gonewt
better Gore than Hillary.Like firing squad is better than lethal injection.
To: Nasty McPhilthy
I wouldn't be surprised if Gore announces his presidential run during his Oscar acceptance speech..
10
posted on
01/27/2007 8:40:16 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: bnelson44
Nixon's stars/planets are lining up for Gore:
Nixon: Twice VP, defeated for the presidency, sat out two terms then was elected President.
Gore: Twice VP, defeated for the presidency, sat out two terms....
11
posted on
01/27/2007 8:42:09 PM PST
by
Rb ver. 2.0
(A Muslim soldier can never be loyal to a non-Muslim commander.)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
If you look at credentials and qualifications, Edwards and Obama don't have any and Hillary is not much better. Gore, with eight years as VP, and Bill Richardson--Congress, energy secretary, ambassador, governor--make more sense. Also, Democrats worship celebrities and Gore has become one.
12
posted on
01/27/2007 8:42:09 PM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Ain't gonna happen.
Gore's biggest problem is that he's gone too far out on a limb on the issue of global warming -- which most people really don't give a flying sh!t about at all.
If you have presidential aspirations, at least make up a bunch of lies about an issue that concerns people.
13
posted on
01/27/2007 8:42:13 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: All
Correct me if I am wrong but did'nt Edwards earn his fortune on a junk science lawsuit that has since been disproven?
14
posted on
01/27/2007 8:43:03 PM PST
by
volunbeer
(Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Amusing article. I also suspect Clinton, Obama and Edwards will all fall short over the next year. Someone like Gore or Richardson looks pretty good compared to those three - relatively speaking.
15
posted on
01/27/2007 8:48:50 PM PST
by
You Dirty Rats
(I Love Free Republic!)
To: Alberta's Child
Most people may not really give a flying sh!t about global warming, but Gore does not need 'most people' to win the nomination. What he needs is liberal moonbat Dem primary voters and they certainly do give a flying sh!t about that.
16
posted on
01/27/2007 8:49:53 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: bnelson44
Al Gore's nomination as the Democrat candidate for President would be God's gift to Republicans.
Let's consider: who could he beat?
Mitt Romney? Nope
John McCain? Probably not
Rudy Guiliani? He's a nightmare candidate for the Republican conservative wing and would probably lose 20% of the Republican base in the general election. But he might pick up that many from the independent and Democrat side.
I can't see him losing either.
So, can anyone tell me how he could win? Only if the Iraq war goes from the current success to a disaster. What is more likely is we make headway against Iranian influence and knock them out by 2008.
17
posted on
01/27/2007 8:50:12 PM PST
by
Forgiven_Sinner
(Here's an experiment for God's existence: Ask Him to contact you.)
To: AntiGuv
Liberal moonbat Dem primary voters couldn't even propel Howard Dean to victory over a Frankenstein-looking goofball in 2004.
18
posted on
01/27/2007 8:51:17 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: Nasty McPhilthy
The stars are aligned perfectly for Al Gore to get the nomination...Then again, the 'rats could do nationally what they did in Connecticut when their energized rabid leftwing antiwar-antiAmerica core turned out to nominate someone to their liking like Edwards, but someone so far out of the mainstream that he never had a chance against more rational and realistic candidates......
To: Nasty McPhilthy
Maybe a little liposuction, some green pants and a lumberjack shirt?
20
posted on
01/27/2007 8:52:05 PM PST
by
bannie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson