To: AntiGuv
Liberal moonbat Dem primary voters couldn't even propel Howard Dean to victory over a Frankenstein-looking goofball in 2004.
18 posted on
01/27/2007 8:51:17 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: Alberta's Child
Dean hardly had a monopoly on liberal moonbats, which is of course why he lost. In 2004 the virtually sole criteria of liberal moonbats was 'electability' and that's how Kerry ultimately won the nomination. Of course, Kerry was unelectable anyhow, but he was probably less unelectable than any of the others.
22 posted on
01/27/2007 8:53:57 PM PST by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: Alberta's Child
Liberal moonbat Dem primary voters couldn't even propel Howard Dean to victory over a Frankenstein-looking goofball in 2004.![](http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c2/Davis1950/Kerry/kerry_herman_munster.jpg)
48 posted on
01/27/2007 11:59:41 PM PST by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: Alberta's Child
Liberal moonbat Dem primary voters couldn't even propel Howard Dean to victory over a Frankenstein-looking goofball in 2004.I was lurking over at DU off an on during the 2004 election cycle and many of them threatened to renounce their registered status as Democrats because some "Frankenstein-looking goofball" was "their guy". Some of those dopeheads were diehard Kucinich supporters and leftwinged clowns who supported Edwards. (they were the more ticked off of the bunch because Edwards got tapped as the VP nominee).
70 posted on
01/28/2007 10:28:39 AM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson