Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guiliani on Abortion: His Record Not as Bad as You Might Think
National Review ^ | January 22, 2007 | Deroy Murdock

Posted on 01/27/2007 3:06:21 PM PST by Senator Goldwater

As pro-lifers mark the 34th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision, many wonder whether they could support Rudolph W. Giuliani for president despite his pro-choice views. While Giuliani’s statements on abortion make pro-lifers fret, they should find his record surprisingly reassuring.

“I don’t like abortion,” Giuliani said last November. “I don’t think abortion is a good thing. I think we ought to find some alternative to abortion, and that there ought to be as few as possible.”

But did Giuliani’s mayoral deeds match such words?

According to the state Office of Vital Statistics, total abortions performed in New York City between 1993 (just before Giuliani arrived) and 2001 (as he departed) fell from 103,997 to 86,466 — a 16.86 percent decrease. This upended a 10.32 percent increase over the course of the eight years before Giuliani, with 1985 witnessing 94,270 abortions.

What about Medicaid-financed abortions? Under Giuliani, such taxpayer-funded feticides dropped 22.85 percent, from 45,006 in 1993 to 34,722 in 2001.

The abortion ratio also slid from 890 terminations per 1,000 live births in 1993 to 767 in 2001, a 13.82 percent tail-off. This far outpaced the 2.84 percent reduction from 1985’s ratio of 916 to 1993’s 890. While abortions remained far more common in Gotham than across America (2001’s U.S. abortion ratio was 246), they diminished during Giuliani’s tenure, as they did nationally.

The Centers for Disease Control reports that U.S. abortions fell from 1,330,414 in 1993 to 853,485 in 2001, a 35.85 percent decrease. Professor New finds that 1993’s 1,001,769 abortions waned to 853,485 in 2001, a 14.8 percent fall-off.

“So, in percentage terms,” New adds, “the decline in abortions in New York City under Giuliani was greater than the national decline.”

(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; abortion; deroymurdock; guiliani; liesdamnlies; president; rudy; statistics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
The numbers don't lie.
1 posted on 01/27/2007 3:06:25 PM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater
I’m pro-choice. I’m pro-gay rights, Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. “No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing,” he responded. Source: CNN.com, “Inside Politics” Dec 2, 1999 http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Rudy_Giuliani_Abortion.htm

ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES (November 14, 2006)

RUDY GIULIANI (R), FORMER MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY: I'm pro- choice. I'm pro-gay rights.

KING: Giuliani supports a woman's right to an abortion, and back in 1999, he opposed a federal ban on late-term abortions.

GIULIANI: No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing.

KING: Immigration could be another presidential landmine. Back in 1996, Mayor Giuliani went to federal court to challenge new federal laws requiring the city to inform the federal government about illegal immigrants.

JEFFREY: He took the side of illegal immigrants in New York City against the Republican Congress.

KING: Giuliani opposes same-sex marriage but as mayor, he supported civil unions and extending health and other benefits to gay couples. He also supported the assault weapons ban and other gun control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association.

GIULIANI: I'm in favor of gun control. I'm pro-choice.

Republican Big-Wigs Support Pro-Abortion Event in NY

Pro-abortion Governor George Pataki and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who also supports unrestricted abortion, are co-chairs of the 2000 Choice Award Presentation to be held on May 30 at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City. The event is sponsored by the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition, a group that is campaigning for the removal of the pro-life plank from the Republican National Platform.


http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200503010743.asp


2 posted on 01/27/2007 3:07:10 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

3 posted on 01/27/2007 3:07:39 PM PST by BunnySlippers (SAY YES TO RUDY !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

4 posted on 01/27/2007 3:08:16 PM PST by BunnySlippers (SAY YES TO RUDY !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

He certainly leads all the Republican candidates in numbers of disgusting vagrants arrested and taken to jail under his orders.

Whether that will appeal to voters in the presidential race, I cannot say.


5 posted on 01/27/2007 3:08:55 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater
This is at least the third time the pro-Rudy supporters have run this article on FR.

Giuliani supports partial birth abortion. Enough said.
6 posted on 01/27/2007 3:09:55 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

It must be election season. We are being told that despite what we see with our own eyes all the liberal Republicans are actually conservative.


7 posted on 01/27/2007 3:10:07 PM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

8 posted on 01/27/2007 3:11:23 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

Bill Clinton was also supposed to reduce abortions in America while still being prochoice.

I don't buy it. As a mayor in New York, Giuliani didn't assign judges. As POTUS, he may have to. And when he does, I don't see how his record on social issues would lead him to appoint a constructionist.


9 posted on 01/27/2007 3:12:14 PM PST by Nevernow ("No one has the right to choose to do what is wrong." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

ba da bump

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1687307/posts?page=4#4

Thru

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1687307/posts?page=37#37


10 posted on 01/27/2007 3:14:56 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Let's vote for the most Democratic-like candidate who the polls say has the best chance of winning ... even though the victory will be meaningless for conservatives and will return control of the GOP to "Rockefeller Republicans."

Makes a lot of sense to me/ sarc.
11 posted on 01/27/2007 3:17:09 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

Obviously you think we're stupid. That's boring. Rude, too.


12 posted on 01/27/2007 3:17:57 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Let all your thinks be thanks." ~ W.H. Auden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

What, Julie Annie didn't have an abortion herself?


13 posted on 01/27/2007 3:18:46 PM PST by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trek
It must be election season. We are being told that despite what we see with our own eyes all the liberal Republicans are actually conservative.

I was just thinking exactly the same thing.

14 posted on 01/27/2007 3:20:15 PM PST by BearArms (Arm yourself because no one else here will save you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

MMmmmmm... Softsoap.

My mother once washed out my mouth with Softsoap after I said a bad word. I would have preferred the bar soap. The Softsoap was terrible.

APf


15 posted on 01/27/2007 3:20:34 PM PST by APFel (Regnum Nostrum Crescit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

What do you think he did with all the homeless people?


:)


16 posted on 01/27/2007 3:27:10 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nevernow

I would rather have Giuliani than Clinton. My choice in the primary will probably be Gingrich or Hunter. I will support any Republican nominee against any Democrat nominee. We will wistfully remember when we had George W. Bush in the WH.


17 posted on 01/27/2007 3:33:50 PM PST by af_vet_1981 (Waiting for Samson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

I would rather Giuliani too...

But I refuse to believe that it's either one or the other. If it is...I'll lose all faith in the American people.


18 posted on 01/27/2007 3:37:17 PM PST by Nevernow ("No one has the right to choose to do what is wrong." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

Doesn't matter. Obama will be president in 2008.


19 posted on 01/27/2007 3:38:36 PM PST by Washi (Support the country you live in, or go live in the country you support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Washi

I'ld rather have the evil elf then Obama.


20 posted on 01/27/2007 3:45:58 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson