Posted on 01/26/2007 12:19:00 PM PST by RedRover
Edited on 01/27/2007 2:28:48 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
CAMP PENDLETON ---- The credibility of three Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents and three enlisted men will be at issue today when a hearing for a Marine officer accused of assaulting Iraqi civilians resumes at Camp Pendleton.
The issue arose earlier this month when a lawyer for 2nd Lt. Nathan Phan alleged that statements prepared by the agents based on interviews with the three enlisted men included fabricated material that implicated his client.
The contention from attorney David Sheldon prompted Lt. Col. William Pigott, who is presiding over Phan's Article 32 hearing, to halt the proceedings until the agents could be present to testify.
The hearing will lead to a recommendation from Pigott as to whether he believes the convening authority, Lt. Gen. James N. Mattis, should order Phan to face court-martial.
Sheldon and Phan's two military attorneys contend they have sworn, signed affidavits from the three enlisted Marines stating they never told the Navy and Marine Corps' law enforcement agency that they saw the lieutenant strike anyone.
Phan was charged in August with assaulting three Iraqi men in the village of Hamdania last year and placing an unloaded pistol in the mouth of one of the alleged victims. He also is accused of making a false official statement.
The hearing is to resume at 8 a.m. today and continue into Saturday. Mattis can either accept or reject the ultimate recommendation from the hearing officer, and he has the same sort of discretion when it comes to a judicial finding and sentence should Phan be ordered to trial and convicted.
Sheldon said this week that he planned an "aggressive examination" of agents who took the enlisted men's statements during interview sessions in Iraq last spring. He also said he expects to call two of the three enlisted Marines to the stand. The third has already testified that he never told agents he saw Phan commit an assault.
An issue that has arisen from Sheldon's assertion is the Naval Criminal Investigative Service's practice of not taping its interviews. Agents instead prepare a typewritten document based on their interviews and then present it to the witness or suspect interviewed to review and to sign as a sworn statement.
Sheldon said he also wants to know why the agency typically tapes drug or stolen property buys conducted by undercover agents, but does not employ the practice in its interview sessions.
Agency officials at its headquarters in Washington say the methodology is under review, with consideration being given to taping statements.
Phan's attorneys maintain that the 26-year-old Sacramento area native is innocent and that Marine Corps prosecutors have failed to submit any evidence that he made a false statement. They also contend that evidence being used to prosecute the assault charge does not establish that he ever struck any Iraqi.
Prosecutors, however, point to the statements the enlisted men made in Iraq and the guilty plea by a Marine corporal last week in an unrelated homicide case as sufficient evidence of wrongdoing.
On Jan. 18, Cpl. Trent Thomas pleaded guilty to murder and related charges in the April 26 shooting death of a 52-year-old Iraqi man in Hamdania. Thomas also pleaded guilty to assaulting one of the men that Phan also is accused of beating, and made reference while being questioned by the judge presiding over his case to seeing the lieutenant place a pistol in the mouth of an Iraqi detainee.
The assault case arose out of the investigation of the homicide. Five of the eight men from Camp Pendleton's Kilo Company from the 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment charged in that case have pleaded guilty to offenses related to the slaying.
Phan was the platoon commander over the men charged in the homicide case but was not present when the killing took place and is not implicated in it in any way.
A pretrial hearing for the squad leader in the homicide case, Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins III, was on the Camp Pendleton court calendar for Monday but it was not immediately clear whether that session will take place.
Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.
BUMP!!
A Nifong agent?
Also these fine threads:
NCIS investigative methods come under fire over prosecution of Marine lieutenant [Hamdania Marines]
NCIS Exposed:Criminals, Thugs, and Liars Bringing Down Marines
Where is Gibbs when you need him?
(reference to NCIS tv show)
Let me or jazusamo know if you want on the Haditha Marine Ping List--also used to alert Freepers to misconduct by military investigators and the prosecution in cases arising out of Iraq.
I am SO disappointed in what is happening in this trial..it is bad enough that the charges were even brought...but now this??
Thanks for keeping us up to date!
I don't think Gibbs, D'Anozzo, McGee or Ziva David would have made such mistakes.
Damn! You beat me to it.
But I guarantee Jenny is going to make those agents pay.
squids..........
Well it dosent matter if he is acquitted or not his career is RUINED!
I'm curious to know why the typed statement wasn't based on what was in his notes, was the difference intentional?
Hopefully they will get more detail this afternoon and tomorrow. It sounds like the pucker factor has just been elevated for the NCIS.
Let's hope so....between these guys and the Senators....why would any soldier put his life on the line for an ungrateful public.
Don't forget, this is an article 32 hearing, not a court martial. if they are having this much trouble with the hearing, think what the defense lawyers are going to do with it, IF IT GOES TO COURT MARTIAL.
Watching for the cross over!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.