Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Future power : pond scum to biodiesel; renewable fuels from algae
http://www.thecherrycreeknews.com/content/view/997/2/ ^ | Tuesday, 23 January 2007

Posted on 01/24/2007 12:18:48 PM PST by WestTexasWend

Pond scum may be an important component of the world's energy future.

Solix Biofuels Inc., a startup company based in Boulder, is working with Colorado State University engineers to commercialize technology that can cheaply mass produce oil derived from algae and turn it into biodiesel - an environmentally friendly solution to high gas prices, greenhouse gas emissions and volatile global energy markets.

Solix officials plan to commercialize the technology over the next two years. After ramping up to widespread production, the company expects to eventually compete commercially with the wholesale price of crude petroleum.

“We’re facing two global challenges: depletion of our petroleum reserves and a buildup of greenhouse gases,” said Bryan Willson, director of Colorado State's Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory, which is helping Colorado State achieve its goal to lead the nation in developing and commercializing environmentally sustainable solutions to global problems. “This process harnesses photosynthesis to turn carbon dioxide and energy captured from the sun into an economical petroleum substitute.”

“Algae are the fastest growing organisms on the planet, and can produce 100 times more oil per acre than conventional soil-tilled crops that are now being grown for biofuel use,” said Solix founder Jim Sears.

Solix officials estimate that widespread construction of its photo-bioreactor system could meet the demand for the U.S. consumption of diesel fuel - about 4 million barrels a day - by growing algae on less than 0.5 percent of the U.S. land area, which is otherwise unused land adjacent to power plants and ethanol plants. The plants produce excess carbon dioxide, which is necessary to turn algae into oil. In addition to producing biodiesel, the process would prevent a large portion of the greenhouse gases produced by coal-burning power plants from being expelled directly into the atmosphere.

“Algae to biofuel technologies are still being developed, yet a strong case can be made for global domestication of algae as an energy crop,” said Doug Henston, chief executive officer of Solix. “We want to manage this technology to create a business that will serve current and future energy stakeholders.”

Colorado State and Solix officials are collaborating with New Belgium Brewing Co. to use excess carbon dioxide from the brewery’s plant to test the algae-based biodiesel process.

Solix is one of many companies doing business in northern Colorado because of its leadership in attracting clean and renewable energy companies and technology.

This spring, Colorado State and Solix participated in the creation of the Northern Colorado Clean Energy Cluster, a clearinghouse that connects entrepreneurs and major power users with researchers and government officials, encouraging innovation, new job creation and investment in the region. The Clean Energy Cluster has already produced several technology transfer opportunities including a new collaboration between Colorado State University's Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory in the College of Engineering and Spirae Inc., a privately held company based in Fort Collins.

A majority of Colorado State’s eight colleges host faculty who are researching clean and renewable energy alternatives including Willson, who is a mechanical engineering professor in the College of Engineering. Also reinforcing the major role of Colorado State in the clean-energy arena is the recent formation of the Clean Energy Collaboratory between the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado State, Colorado School of Mines and the University of Colorado.

"Commercialization partners such as Solix are critical to the successful transfer of laboratory innovations to the marketplace, and with the tremendous entrepreneurial interest in the Northern Colorado region, we expect to see Colorado State participating in many more startups,” said Mark Wdowik, vice president for Technology Transfer at Colorado State University Research Foundation - a private, non-profit foundation that aids the university in its research and educational efforts including the responsibility to protect and manage the intellectual property resulting from that research.

“We have already seen evidence of earlier commercialization successes from the engines lab, including Envirofit, a not-for-profit corporation created to commercialize reduced emissions technologies created by Dr. Willson and his colleagues, and we expect more to come,” Wdowik said.

The Solix collaboration is one example of Colorado State's emphasis, as stated in the university's Strategic Plan, to develop closer ties to the community and foster economic development via expeditious technology transfer and commercialization.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: apoliticalpondscum; biodiesel; energy; renewableenergy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: WestTexasWend
Interesting, but I have one big question: won't this cut into our supply of fertilizer? You have to put some biological waste back into the soil or else you deplete it of its nutrients. What happens if we burn all our waste in our cars? Doesn't seem very sustainable to me.
21 posted on 01/24/2007 1:16:09 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
If you had the proper permits, anyone with lets say 5 or more achers of land , could they build a pond with a small dam and use a small hydroelectric generator ?
22 posted on 01/24/2007 1:21:21 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

"Algae are the fastest growing organisms on the planet, and can produce 100 times more oil per acre than conventional soil-tilled crops"

Farmers can only work with the the top 6 inches of soil. How deep are the tanks for that 1 acre of alge? 10, 12 feet? How about using one of the tanks they now use to store oil? You can fit a lot more alge in 1 acre because you can work vertically.


23 posted on 01/24/2007 1:40:29 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
If they can create energy sources from pond scum, can you just imagine what we could power with Democrats?

That depends on which has a higher energy content... pond scum or Democrats.

I think that Democrats used as fuel would be a non-starter. Democrats are negative energy content.

24 posted on 01/24/2007 1:42:32 PM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Sounds like someone finally found a use for Rhode Island.

It says pond scum, not @$$holes.

25 posted on 01/24/2007 1:43:53 PM PST by Fierce Allegiance ("Campers laugh at clowns behind closed doors.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

"If you had the proper permits, anyone with lets say 5 or more achers of land , could they build a pond with a small dam and use a small hydroelectric generator ?"

Probably. But you would need running water. A pond is stagnant and your paddle wheel would just sit there thinking about the mighty Colorado river!

:0)


26 posted on 01/24/2007 1:44:09 PM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

"It says pond scum, not @$$holes."

Yep.

Now, if they were talking 'methane' that would be a different story!


27 posted on 01/24/2007 1:48:45 PM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
Not unless the generator is located on the other side of a small dam were there is some running water.
The only problem I see in this, is when the water dries up.
28 posted on 01/24/2007 1:49:39 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

It's still widely used (and actually in short supply) in Africa and less developed countries, but there's not much demand for manure as fertilizer in the US anymore. It brings in too many weed seeds, and chemical fertilizers are easier to put down and provide more uniform in coverage.

If it were feasible to use it as gasoline replacement it could lead to shortages, but they're using it to power an ethanol plant, and the TX panhandle's produces plenty for that...and then some.



29 posted on 01/24/2007 2:01:52 PM PST by WestTexasWend (NO OIL FOR APPEASERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

The poster had stated could they 'build' a pond.

You don't need running water to 'build' a pond because if you hit the 'water table' the pond would eventually fill up, although not completely.

Now if the pond were built at the end of a running stream, then yes, a water paddle with a generator would work.

"The only problem I see in this, is when the water dries up."

Yep. Unless you build it on a mountain stream that is feed from either a glacier or permanent (semi?) snow cap.


30 posted on 01/24/2007 2:03:43 PM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
Is there ongoing research on liquifying democrats?

Put a Traitor in Your Tank!

Now we're cooking with gasbags!
31 posted on 01/24/2007 2:31:22 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

"Algae are the fastest growing organisms on the planet, and can produce 100 times more oil per acre than conventional soil-tilled crops"
Farmers can only work with the the top 6 inches of soil. How deep are the tanks for that 1 acre of alge? 10, 12 feet? How about using one of the tanks they now use to store oil? You can fit a lot more alge in 1 acre because you can work vertically


Actually these ponds are very shallow, typically about 12 inches deep. One of the most interesting facts that nobody talks about is that not only would the algae absorb carbon dioxide but it would give off as a product of growth, oxygen. Talk about clean.


32 posted on 01/24/2007 2:41:57 PM PST by JAKraig (Joseph Kraig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

"Algae are the fastest growing organisms on the planet, and can produce 100 times more oil per acre than conventional soil-tilled crops"
Farmers can only work with the the top 6 inches of soil. How deep are the tanks for that 1 acre of alge? 10, 12 feet? How about using one of the tanks they now use to store oil? You can fit a lot more alge in 1 acre because you can work vertically


Actually these ponds are very shallow, typically about 12 inches deep. One of the most interesting facts that nobody talks about is that not only would the algae absorb carbon dioxide but it would give off as a product of growth, oxygen. Talk about clean.


33 posted on 01/24/2007 2:42:11 PM PST by JAKraig (Joseph Kraig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

The same amount of sunlight per acre hits the top 1" of soil as hits a tank 100 feet deep full of algae. If {corn, soybeans, sugar cane, sugar beets, oil palms, etc} successfully converted 10% of the incident solar energy to useable fuel energy, how could the same area of algea ponds possibly do 100x better? There's only a factor of 10 left to reach 100% efficiency. One of two things is mistaken, either my recollection of 10% solar input: energy output with respect to food crops, or that algae is 100x energetically better than food crops are.


34 posted on 01/24/2007 3:30:04 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

Congress generates a lot of hot air from pond scum, so if we could just harness that hot air....


35 posted on 01/24/2007 4:11:34 PM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

If they get to 20% efficiency, that would be 100% more than before.


36 posted on 01/24/2007 4:50:18 PM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

Pond scum?

What you hear is the sound of a shark jumping. The fuel diversity fad has reached critical mass. Willie Nelson is tipping over.


37 posted on 01/24/2007 6:34:28 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Doctor's appointment with my wife..........


38 posted on 01/24/2007 7:42:59 PM PST by Red Badger (Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

The claim I quoted above was that algae produced "100x" more oil per acre than food crops, not "100%" more, which I agree would be 2x more. If I'm right that food crops are ~10% efficient, then it would mean algae is 1000% efficient, or 990% more than food crops are. Except that's physically impossible, so something must be wrong - me, or the claim.


39 posted on 01/24/2007 8:44:17 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
What are you trying to say? Where are you getting this 1% efficiency nonsense? You're talking about solar cells and comparing electricity equivalent solar energy with fuel produced from crops. You're comparing seed crops with limited growing seasons to simple algae that can be grown year around. Whether we're talking about something like soybeans or rapeseed or sunflowers or whatever, these are plants that have to be spaced out and that have an awful lot of biomass that does not contain oil. The oil is in the seeds. Some of these algae strains they are working with are a good 50% oil and can be grown year around and be continually harvested. You aren't making valid comparisons and you aren't really making any sense.

All these people are saying is that they believe they'll get 100 times as much oil from an acre than current fuel crops. That's not very specific anyway, because our main biodiesel crop, soybeans, will only yield something like 40 or 50 gallons of biodiesel per acre, but there are other crops like rapeseed that we use for biodiesel that will yield a good bit over 100 gallons per acre, and oil palms grown in some parts of the world will yield better than 650 gallons per acre. I don't know what plants they are referring to when they say they'll be able to get 100 times more oil than "conventional soil-tilled crops."

Researchers gung ho about biodiesel from algae believe they'll be able to get many thousands of gallons per acre. I've even heard estimates as optimistic as 50,000 gallons per acre, but most seem to think it will be closer to 10,000 or less. They've already gotten some pretty fantastic yields but it's been too expensive and too hit or miss so far. They haven't been able to get consistent yields on large scale yet. Open ponds haven't worked out well because they are too easily contaminated with wild algae and other things that mess up their algae crops. They've also had problems with temperature sensitivity. They haven't settled on what particular types of algae they'll end up using, or whether they'll use a salt water or fresh or brackish water variety. We really won't know if any of this will work for large scale biodiesel production until it actually happens.

Could the produce several thousand gallons of biodiesel per acre from biodiesel? It actually looks promising. Could they do it at a low enough cost to compete with petro-diesel? That seems like the bigger problem, but maybe someday they'll succeed. There are about 43,560 square feet in an acre, just a hair under 4047 square meters. That's an awful lot of room to play with. Algae is a simple plant that is extremely efficient at photosynthesis. It eats up carbon dioxide and sunlight. It doesn't have a lot of excess parts not dedicated to photosynthesis. It grows quickly and like I said can be continuously harvested, year around if conditions are right. Oil content can be very high and extracting oil from algae has to be easier and take less energy than extracting it from hard seeds they have to crush up after stripping them from the rest of the plant material. Algae can be grown several inches thick, thicker if they have a way of agitating or otherwise moving it such that that farther below the surface will get enough light. Some of it grows fine in the shade. There seems to be a lot of potential.
40 posted on 01/24/2007 11:33:55 PM PST by TKDietz (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson