Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: LibWhacker
Maybe we will be lucky, and cancer will go the way of many other diseases......
brought low by a shot in the butt.
2 posted on
01/17/2007 5:30:57 PM PST by
Dreagon
To: LibWhacker
Another cure for cancer - where are my smokes!
3 posted on
01/17/2007 5:31:03 PM PST by
spanalot
To: LibWhacker
4 posted on
01/17/2007 5:33:38 PM PST by
Kevmo
(Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
To: LibWhacker
7 posted on
01/17/2007 5:35:10 PM PST by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: LibWhacker
9 posted on
01/17/2007 5:35:52 PM PST by
aculeus
To: LibWhacker
11 posted on
01/17/2007 5:39:59 PM PST by
AFreeBird
(If American "cowboy diplomacy" did not exist, it would be necessary to invent it.)
To: LibWhacker
Unless the FDA fast-tracks it, it will be years before US patients see it...
12 posted on
01/17/2007 5:41:48 PM PST by
GoldCountryRedneck
("Idiocy - Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers" - despair.com)
To: LibWhacker
Yawn. Bird flu and third world cancer cures suppressed by the evil military industrial complex.
Heard it all in the 70s when it was swine flu and apricot pit extract.
13 posted on
01/17/2007 5:43:54 PM PST by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: LibWhacker
Wow, this is incredible.
Sure hope it proves true.
14 posted on
01/17/2007 5:44:35 PM PST by
upchuck
(The American coup de grâce is well under way. Thus far, the Donks haven't had to fire a shot.)
To: LibWhacker
22 years too late in my husband's case.
17 posted on
01/17/2007 5:48:59 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: LibWhacker
No Patent?
Nobody will ever credibly promote it, because if a company can't protect it's profitablity, they'd rather undermine it.
And the Doctor's will join the drug companies in undermining it for the same reason.
Do you have any idea how HUGE the cancer treatment industry is???
I only truly learned after going through radiation at one facility and chemo at another, during combined treatment.
It's amazing how many patients they crank through there in any given week!
18 posted on
01/17/2007 5:49:30 PM PST by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: LibWhacker
Since the drug is already used to treat a disease (I assume with FDA approval), why should any drug company that wants to sell it need to re-prove its safety, at least at approved dosage? The risks should already be documented. Drug companies can't market the drug as a 'cancer killer', but doctors can prescribe a drug for anything they want.
To: LibWhacker
Here's a related article and summary by the same group of Canadian researchers cited in the journal
Cancer Cell (complete article requires purchase).
A Mitochondria-K+ Channel Axis Is Suppressed in Cancer and Its Normalization Promotes Apoptosis and Inhibits Cancer Growth
Summary
The unique metabolic profile of cancer (aerobic glycolysis) might confer apoptosis resistance and be therapeutically targeted. Compared to normal cells, several human cancers have high mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) and low expression of the K+ channel Kv1.5, both contributing to apoptosis resistance. Dichloroacetate (DCA) inhibits mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK), shifts metabolism from glycolysis to glucose oxidation, decreases ΔΨm, increases mitochondrial H2O2, and activates Kv channels in all cancer, but not normal, cells; DCA upregulates Kv1.5 by an NFAT1-dependent mechanism. DCA induces apoptosis, decreases proliferation, and inhibits tumor growth, without apparent toxicity. Molecular inhibition of PDK2 by siRNA mimics DCA. The mitochondria-NFAT-Kv axis and PDK are important therapeutic targets in cancer; the orally available DCA is a promising selective anticancer agent.
24 posted on
01/17/2007 5:59:02 PM PST by
SpaceBar
To: LibWhacker
Reportedly the Acai berry from the Amazon kills cancer cells and is the number 1 antioxidant in the world by ten fold.
To: LibWhacker
Could this be true?
To: Running On Empty
To: LibWhacker
31 posted on
01/17/2007 6:19:01 PM PST by
DocRock
To: LibWhacker
32 posted on
01/17/2007 6:23:43 PM PST by
Bender2
("Come back with your shield, or on it." Later on, this custom declined. So did Rome. So may we...)
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
37 posted on
01/17/2007 8:31:10 PM PST by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson