Could your source have any more popups? Sheezzzz
I am beginning to think that the 2006 victory of the Dims is the best thing that could happen for the Republicans in '08.
Clinton, Pelosi, Boxer, Cantwell, Murray, Snow, etc.
As for Boxer, it's hard to grasp the exact direction her pointed and unnecessary attack on Condoleeza Rice was going.
Obviously not here...the following are childless women who Boxer forgot to mention.
Baroness White, Former UK Labour Government Minister
Sally Ride, First American Female Astronaut
Judith Resnick, Astronaut
Janet Reno, Former U.S. Attorney-General
Jeanette Rankin, 1st Female US Representative
Florence Nightingale, Nurse
Queen Liliuokalani, Queen of Hawaii
Joan of Arc, Christian Saint
Patricia Ireland, President of the National Organization for Women/ NOW
Emma Goldman, Activist, Feminist
Elizabeth I, Queen of England
Maureen Dowd, Columnist
Elizabeth Dole, Reagan's Secretary of Transportation
Charlotte Curtis, First woman on the masthead of The New York Times
Helen Clark, New Zealand Prime Minister
Helen Gurley Brown, Feminist, Editor
Susan B. Anthony, Womans' Suffragist
Rosa Parks,activist.
bump for later
LOL great article. Thanks for posting.
Democrat Hags and Nags.
They produce nothing but misery.
These people are simply the consequences of the doctrines of inclusion, equal rights, empowerment, the big tent, room at the table, tolerance, debate, discussion; the expression of different points of view, all people have worth, human dignity, democracy etc. In actuality their conduct is simply an expression of what they are. To deal with them members of our society must relearn the concepts of exclusion, the outcast, those who do not belong. Relearn the ability to command instead of bothering to learn how to attempt discussion with trash.
These people are totally useless. They have no clue which makes matters much worse.
.
It was clear throughout his presidency, to me at least, that she often wished she could push him off the stage and take the microphone. The more adoring she acted, the more suspicious it looked.
ROFLOL Nailed her!
Bump!
And the women seem to be leading the pack.
Any bets on how long it will be before there are major cat fights.
(Female) Democrats seem to relate everything to their nurturing role as mothers. Pelosi had children join her at the podium, Boxer criticizes Rice's capacities based on a lack of motherhood experience, Edwards talks about sending "boys and girls" to die. A whole contingent accompanies Cindy Sheehan using her grief as a mother as a legitimate platform on which to base public policy decisions regarding the war. Democrats seem to feel that this is a perfectly legitimate, if not preferable, basis on which to make foreign policy decisions.
They say that there is a difference in the way women will typically fight in comparison to men. Women will wait until the confrontation crosses their threshold. Men will take the battle away from their home. Maggie Thatcher was supposed to have been a great strategist in that she took the battle away from home.
In my opinion, Republicans need to identify, isolate and discredit emotional rhetoric and insist that public policy be made on robust, clean fact with assumptions closely examined and logic and consistency used to make decisions. The media and the Pubs. seem to buy into the emitional rationale as a credible basis for decision. We need to name it and expose it for what it is.
haha!
Just call them: The Bitch Squad.