Posted on 01/09/2007 8:27:45 AM PST by jmc813
Screw Medved
Screw Horowitz
Screw Reagan
Screw Heston
It's a long list, screw them all.
It's the conspiracy charge.
If he's right, and the White House is involved, Charlie Rangel might be right about impeachment.
If you're conspiracy minded today, consider Corsi's role.
There's nothing new here.
He was a factor in GWBs re-election.
Why did he support a conspirator?
"Say what you want about Medved, he doesn't shy from debate."
Actually he does sometimes. Saw it right here in Minnesota at the State Fair.
Amazing how easy to avoid debate when one has their hand on the microphone. I've seen it even with talk show hosts I agree with.
In one variant of definition yes. But "opinion" can also mean "a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter". As it is obvious from the context the word "opinion" was used in the later meaning. At least it is what I meant and presumably Hugin meant as well.
I agree. And sometimes it makes me laugh; other times... I decide to pick up a newer reading hobby.
Equally annoying is the corollary, debate the needle by pointing at a haystack.
Yes, it IS indisputable that Mexicans spend more on American made goods, than American spend on Mexican made ones. But there are some here, to whom facts just don't matter at all.
Why should Medved offer crazy Corsi FREE airtime?
Then I guess Ronald Reagan was a "phony" all along too. Right?
I mean, Reagan was a DEM far longer and loved FDR, until his dying day. :-)
Yes, I've had this happen before with pulled posts, too. The mods will pull any post for even the mildest profanity if someone complains. I got a post pulled for "attacking someone personally" in a hypothetical. I don't blame the mods for it, but it's a pretty pathetic tactic.
FDR was a Socialist and he surrounded himself with card carrying Commies and KGB agents; Alger Hiss in particular.
LOL
"Of course, we want Mexico and Canada to work hard to defend our borders from criminals, terrorists, and illegals while making it easier for our law-abiding citizens and their law abiding citizens to cross the borders..."
As soon as Hawkins said that I knew everything.
"We (who is this "we"? I assume his pet ferret is in his pocket) want Mexico and Canada to work hard to defend OUR borders...etc"
Isn't the US supposed to defend its borders? Not depend on other countries to defend them? This doens't make a pinch of sense. And anyone who doesn't see the horrible danger and destruction of the open borders situation is either (a) blind, deaf, dumb and illiterate or (b) has an ulterior reason for wanting open borders.
The debate (if you can call it that) is highly enlightening. Hawkins is so amazingly transparent that I wonder he's not too ashamed to put pen to paper (metaphorically speaking). People who never argue facts but merely use the typical straw man, ad hominem, and insults are never to be trusted.
I know what you mean. LOL
And it's a sure and certain sign that some here, who pretend to be just oh so much better than the rest of us, can't stand factual refutation, nor even anyone not agreeing completely with them. Poor widdle babies, that they are.........
Thank you for your assistance.
But I will name the ones with whom I disagree.
In general, a candidate must have been one of the many young, arrogant anti-Goldwater, "anti-war/pro-Ho" commie-dupe jerks of the 1960s and 1970s who were praised by the MSM as the brightest young ever produced by America.
I cannot say that Mr. Medved meets all the criteria, I cannot say that he advocated for a North Viet Nam Communist victory (pro-Ho) but he meets all other criteria -- and has, to the best of my knowledge done little more than say, "I've changed since then."
John Kerry meets all the criteria and lots more besides.
They don't cut me a lot of slack, but I'd say that that was exceedingly lame on the part of Paul Ross, wouldn't you? I embarassed him with the truth, and he chose the weasel's way out.
On the other hand, Medved has time to write thousands of words shrilly denouncing what Corsi has to say. He can't really have it both ways. Either Corsi's thesis doesn't deserve the dignity of a response, or it merits a normal invitation to appear on the show.
After all, he was willing to do as much for Noam Chomsky...
So does David Horowitz.
Oh yes, I agree with you completely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.