Thank you for your assistance.
But I will name the ones with whom I disagree.
In general, a candidate must have been one of the many young, arrogant anti-Goldwater, "anti-war/pro-Ho" commie-dupe jerks of the 1960s and 1970s who were praised by the MSM as the brightest young ever produced by America.
I cannot say that Mr. Medved meets all the criteria, I cannot say that he advocated for a North Viet Nam Communist victory (pro-Ho) but he meets all other criteria -- and has, to the best of my knowledge done little more than say, "I've changed since then."
John Kerry meets all the criteria and lots more besides.
So does David Horowitz.