Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Program would give farmers ‘carbon credit’
AP ^ | January 6, 2006

Posted on 01/08/2007 3:58:11 PM PST by Shermy

BILLINGS (AP) — A Butte-based coalition is predicting farmers in Montana, Wyoming and Colorado are on their way to getting paid for conservation practices such as no-till farming that keep carbon dioxide in the ground Ted Dodge of the National Carbon Offset Coalition believes the Chicago Climate Exchange will soon allow farmers in the three states to bundle their ‘‘carbon credits’’ for sale. The private agency trades greenhouse gases and pollutants much like other exchanges trade commodities.

A spokesman for the Chicago Climate Exchange was out of the office Friday and did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Supporters of the plan say it’s a way to reward farmers who want to help cut down on global warming.

The practice will set the stage for the day when the United States places a cap on carbon dioxide emissions and more corporations seek ways to buy credits to offset emissions, Dodge said.

‘‘We’re trying to get ahead of the curve,’’ he said. ‘‘We think it’s going to be the largest commodity market in the world when it takes off.’’

So far, about 20 Montana farmers have shown an interest in the program, Dodge said.

Most are wheat farmers who already are planting crops without tilling the soil, which can be more labor-intensive and sometimes involves cutting slots in the field and dropping in seeds.

‘‘Many of them are doing this from a conservation standpoint, but now there’s an opportunity for some remuneration for it,’’ said Jane Holzer, director of the Montana Salinity Control Program in Conrad, who has been helping farmers sign up for carbon trading.

Obstacles include relatively low and fluctuating prices, and the fact that describing exactly what a carbon credit is — a unit equal to 1 metric ton of carbon — can seem a little abstract.

Holzer estimated that, under current prices, a farmer could get $250 to $350 a year for 100 acres that meet carbon sequestration standards.

‘‘It’s not big money, but it’s $250 you didn’t have if you didn’t sign up,’’ Holzer said.

More than 200 corporations, cities and other entities buy carbon credits at Chicago Climate Exchange, which has been operating since 2003. Most use the credits to offset emissions in countries operating under the Kyoto Protocol, which set mandatory limits on carbon dioxide.

Dodge and the Butte-based coalition, which is made up of seven Montana non-profits, are organizing interested farmers and hoping to aggregate their carbon credits and sell them in bulk.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3cardmonte; carboncredits; flimflam; globaloney; globalwarming; scam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 01/08/2007 3:58:12 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shermy

What a joke.


2 posted on 01/08/2007 4:00:44 PM PST by Jaysun (I've never paid for sex in my life. And that's really pissed off a lot of prostitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Lets get really creative. How many ways can we find to give farmers presents. How about $10,000 silo bonus. Why only give them money when it's too hot, too cold, too wet or too dry. How about "Everthing's Just Right" insurance?


3 posted on 01/08/2007 4:00:47 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

I'm thinking the Chicago Climate Exchange should least pay me a couple hundred dollars a week.


4 posted on 01/08/2007 4:01:05 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

...for not mowing my grass.


5 posted on 01/08/2007 4:01:29 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
largest commodity market--based on human willpower?

If any Christian freeper here is also a Wikipedian, would you look at this Operation Auca Wikipedia article, and help the primary author on the discussion page? Two apparent atheist/unChristians have extreme views, including a German who is attempting to explain nuances in the English language to the (apparently) American author.

Not a Wikipedian, only a Wookieepedian (and other Wikia), and they take the IP address.

6 posted on 01/08/2007 4:01:33 PM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( WND, NewsMax, Townhall.com, Brietbart.com, and Drudge Report are not valid news sources.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

this is how the Dems "pay off" another constituency. in the meantime, US industry moves to china where they won't face having to buy these stupid "credits". who will buy them you ask? we will be forced to, if you want to buy a car/SUV that gets below a certain MPG - you'll have to buy one of these credits if the left gets its way.


7 posted on 01/08/2007 4:04:07 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary; USFRIENDINVICTORIA; pierrem15; No.6; Allan
The scams of carbon trading are several. Here's one example of earning money for something you are already doing do to choice or soil management regulation. This is like the European nations like Britain who due to new emissions standards must close coal plants--so they accord themselves "carbon credits" for doing what they otherwise must do, and seek to earn money off them on the soon to be realized carbon markets in states like California.

As for the private carbon exchange in Chicago, it's not well publicized. I can't see why foreign nations would buy American carbon credits unless the trading partners are the same companies and interests trying to launder money into the United States, or avoid some tax. Perhaps overseas earnings can be taken more cheaply into the USA if they are laundered as a Carbon Credit??

Earlier story:

China Cashes In on Global Warming

8 posted on 01/08/2007 4:07:30 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

stupid is as stupid does..........


9 posted on 01/08/2007 4:07:43 PM PST by PeterPrinciple (Seeking the Truth here Folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Chicago Climate Exchange

LMFAO

Three card monte dealers with delusions of grandeur.


10 posted on 01/08/2007 4:08:12 PM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

"...for not mowing my grass."

Everyone with a lawn should be able to get a check also. And something for every tree that we have in our yard...


11 posted on 01/08/2007 4:11:33 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Carbon dioxide is an important plant nutrient (really), so it may be just a little silly to be talking about sequestering it from the atmosphere. If that is the objective, there are easier way to take the fraction of CO2 out of the air than some complicated scheme involving subsidies and compliance with dictated guidelines.

Carbon dioxide is an important industrial compound, used for a number of processes and as a feedstock for other product synthesis. Simply cooling air down to -109.3 °F or -78.5 °C causes CO2 to fall out of the air like snow, and in fact, it is called "dry ice". Pressurization causes the CO2 to condense as a liquid at about 5.1 atm, (about 75 lbs/square inch). Carbon dioxide forms a clear liquid, much like water, and releasing it from pressure causes a great uptake of heat, enough so that it is used to put out fires of electrical origin. Plus all the oxygen is driven away from the fire.


12 posted on 01/08/2007 4:22:51 PM PST by alloysteel (Character is a private trait. Reputation is the public aspect that is revealed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

Its absurd.


13 posted on 01/08/2007 4:36:08 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

How much crap is enough?
Where will the line FINALLY get drawn?
By whom?
And how will they make it STICK?

Until that is known, everything else is just jaw jackin'.


14 posted on 01/08/2007 6:47:47 PM PST by HKMk23 (PRO-LIFE: Because a Person's a Person, no matter how small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Won;'t be long before they start fining farmers for tilling- the huge cash cow known as global warming begins to rear it;'s ugly head.

The following link does not relate to this thread http://sacredscoop.com


15 posted on 01/08/2007 7:20:58 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Something I just learned today
from a local radio station.
The idea of "carbon credits" is not new.
Apparently it was tried earlier
with phosphorous
in order to reduce pollution.
I don't know if Maurice Strong was involved
I don't have more details
perhaps someone else does
but anyway
the plan failed miserably.


16 posted on 01/08/2007 7:57:27 PM PST by Allan (*-O)):~{>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

btw I hear Maurice
along with Jean
(the guy who brought Kyoto to Canada)
currently are spending a lot of time in China.
(To assess the human rights situation
no doubt)


17 posted on 01/08/2007 8:07:03 PM PST by Allan (*-O)):~{>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; Calpernia

Ping


18 posted on 01/08/2007 10:01:11 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Wait until you have to buy exhale credits for having a certain number of people in your family.


19 posted on 01/09/2007 5:18:15 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Allan

Why is Maurice still walking around? Did his investigation just fade away?

I'm shocked.


Not really.


20 posted on 01/09/2007 5:19:27 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson