Posted on 01/08/2007 11:53:22 AM PST by rellimpank
The First Hundred Hours have begun. (Lest anyone wonder why they arent already over, new Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi meant congressional working hours, not real hours.) Weve seen Pelosi show exactly how much her own wonderfulness needs to be celebratedand her grandiose tendency to think of herself as Mangog-like living embodiment of all the glories and splendors of her entire gender.
But what of the Democrats 100 Hours agenda, past celebrating Pelosi-hood? It's not worth the cannoli with which it was launched.
The ethics reform stuff deserves at least a half-hearted cheer, if only because its nice to see bipartisanship work at its best: not in allowing government to act more swiftly, but in generating internal tensions that drive congressmen to act against their general interest as politicians in favor of their particular interests as party members.
(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...
Someone's dreaming.
House chambers are empty this "first day as speaker".
There should also be no secret holds on bills or nominations. If a Congressman feels strongly enough to put a stop to something, he should proudly go to the podium and tell the world what he is doing and why.
"100 Hours" Ping.
Depends. In normal business billing each employee's hours are billed, even when they're working together. The 100 hours would get knocked off in less than an hour if we werre talking real business hours.
This usually happens in Korea for the Super Bowl. The military knows lots of military personnel will be up at an insane hour to watch the game and will not be productive the next day.
I wouldn't recommend it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.