Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford's Future May Rest on 2 Redesigns
ap ^ | 1/7/06 | Tom Krisher, AP Business Writer

Posted on 01/07/2007 7:50:16 AM PST by Flavius

DEARBORN, Mich. (AP) -- The challenge from Ford Motor Co.'s top brass was daunting: Take an old car and a bland one and make them better. Don't change their basic frames and footprints, but make them look and feel new. And by the way, the future of the company is at stake, because if they don't sell, the automaker could run out of money.

hat's what Ford designers and engineers faced when they set out to update the aging Focus small car and the slow-selling Five Hundred full-sized sedan.

The company will unveil new versions of both models this week at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. A lot is riding on them when they hit the showrooms later this year as 2008 models, especially if consumers continue to shift from trucks and sport utility vehicles to cars.

"Certainly there's pressure," Lon Zaback, chief designer of the Focus, said recently as he walked around the car explaining its new features. "I don't feel any anxiety about it at all because I think we've done a terrific job."

Ford has mortgaged its assets to borrow up to $23.4 billion to fund a massive restructuring plan and cover billions in losses expected until 2009. The company, which lost $7 billion in the first nine months of last year, expects to burn up $17 billion in cash during the next two years.

Analysts say the company desperately needs sales to raise cash if it hopes to survive.

The compact Focus, first introduced in 1999, now looks old and clunky. The Five Hundred generally is perceived as good but underpowered and pedestrian.

First the company did market research to figure out what needed to change.

With the Focus, Zaback and the redesign team knew they would be limited by the car's current architecture in their efforts to modernize the company's entry in the small car market.

They raised the sheet metal on the sides, shrinking the window size to give it a sloping, sportier look, with horizontal creases in the sheet metal. There's more chrome on the grille, mimicking Ford's successful Fusion mid-sized car, and the hood became more rounded.

"The car appears to be a little bit shorter and have shorter overhangs. It has a much more sporty appearance because of some of the proportional things we did with it," Zaback said.

The interior is simple but modern with nicer seats, lighted cupholders and more expensive materials including a brushed aluminum look for the dashboard and blue instrument lighting.

The new Focus also is among the models to get the optional Ford-Microsoft "Sync" system that integrates cell phones and personal music players into the car's electronics, something Ford hopes will appeal to younger buyers.

"There's a night-and-day difference between today's Focus and the new one. We really improved it," said Greg Burgess, the vehicle development manager.

While the designers were at work, engineers were busy going over all the existing car's parts, refining the two-liter four-cylinder engine, steering and suspension. Although horsepower figures weren't released, Ford said they made the car more powerful while reducing its weight by about 100 pounds. It will be at least as fuel efficient as the current model, which gets 37 miles per gallon on the highway, said Marcio Alfonso, the chief engineer.

The Five Hundred got a less-radical redesign with changes in the front grille and rear lights and fenders to make it look more sporty and more like the Fusion.

The body didn't change much, but the car gets a modernized interior and a new 3.5-liter V6 engine with 60 more horsepower and a six-speed automatic transmission. It should be as fuel efficient and much quieter than the old one even though its zero-to-60 acceleration time is 1.5 seconds faster, Ford said. Market research showed that buyers thought the old versions were underpowered, Ford said.

It also will get optional electronic stability control, something that should get it back on the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's list of safest cars, said Killol Bhuta, the car's marketing manager.

"It was always good. We just made it better," Bhuta said.

The Five Hundred, built on Volvo architecture, sold moderately well in 2005, its first full year on the market, but sales nose-dived last year from almost 108,000 to about 84,000, something Ford hopes the redesign will reverse. Focus also saw its sales drop last year to just over 177,000, down more than 100,000 from a peak of around 286,000 in 2000.

Ford said it hasn't set prices on either the Five Hundred, which hits showrooms in the summer, or the Focus, which comes in the fall.

Several analysts who have seen the new Fords say the changes are good steps but may not be enough to fend off sharper, newer designs from the competition.

Erich Merkle, director of forecasting for the auto consulting company IRN Inc. in Grand Rapids, said the new Focus, for instance, still doesn't look as modern as Honda's Civic, which he considers to be the gold standard for small cars.

"It's a step forward, but it's not a dramatic leap," he said. "Unfortunately the competition is really moving forward in that segment."

He and Rebecca Lindland, an auto analyst at Global Insight, an economic research and consulting company, said Ford may not have had the cash to redo the Focus completely, a charge that Ford denies.

Merkle said Ford could have brought the superior European Focus to America instead of remaking the U.S. version.

"Ford does a lot of things that sometimes I just scratch my head over," he said.

Lindland likes the new Focus but said the Five Hundred still is too conservative to set it apart from competitors.

"In order to attract people into a showroom, you need to have something that's going to turn people's heads," she said. "It's not cutting edge at all."

The people working on the new cars, though, think otherwise.

"Our mind-set hasn't changed regardless of what our financial position is," said Beth Donovan, Ford's small car marketing manager. "We want to win."

On the Net: http://www.ford.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: autoindustry; ford; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: IOWAfan

The Taurus started slipping with that peculiar re-style, with all the ovals, everywhere, on the dash, the back window, the headlights ... it looked sort of like a catfish from the front. The car my folks traded was a 95 Taurus, which was a good car for them, for the entire time they owned it, no problems to speak of. It was just about to turn 100K, and the headliner was starting to let go, so they went shopping for a new car. They didn't care for the last iteration of the Taurus at all, the Fusion was too small, and the Five Hundred was too big. They were looking for something about the size of their 95 Taurus, which could seat five in reasonable comfort, but got good mileage and was easy to maneuver and park. The only domestic that fit the bill was the Impala. They like it well enough, but they're not elated with it, as they were with the Taurus when they got it new.


41 posted on 01/07/2007 9:09:22 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
"union workers"

Ten barefoot boys with shoes on, stood sitting on the grass.


42 posted on 01/07/2007 9:10:01 AM PST by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

Oh, the reference to unions didn't include the union workers? Nice try.


43 posted on 01/07/2007 9:10:56 AM PST by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Re the Taurus--What was Ford thinking? And what were they thinking with a $40,000 T-bird?


44 posted on 01/07/2007 9:14:55 AM PST by zook (America going insane - "Do you read Sutter Caine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GaryMontana

What model of Ford was this?


45 posted on 01/07/2007 9:15:12 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

Keep looking at them.


46 posted on 01/07/2007 9:17:00 AM PST by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

Most of the people who sell and service union made cars are not in unions either. Also there are many shops that make parts for these cars that are non-union. So, people can support overseas makers if they want, but it does affect all Americans in some way.


47 posted on 01/07/2007 9:17:19 AM PST by westmichman (The will of God always trumps the will of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Yeah, because all of the successful companies are run by blue collared six sigma brains (/sarcasm)


48 posted on 01/07/2007 9:18:12 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blastdad51

Speaking of CAD design, I think you should look at the new Caddies. CTS and XLR look pretty good to me especially the turbo models.


49 posted on 01/07/2007 9:20:32 AM PST by westmichman (The will of God always trumps the will of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dirtbiker

Ford trucks are good.


50 posted on 01/07/2007 9:21:02 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son

OK buy a Kia and support Korea. There happen to be many hard working patriotic family men ho happen to be in the UAW. (Many sloths as well)


51 posted on 01/07/2007 9:21:09 AM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Too late, Ford.

If you'd only pulled your heads back into the light a couple of
years earlier, you might of sold my mom a new car last week.

She liked the new Fusion. She doesn't like the instability of the
company that makes it.
And since she doesn't like the current Malibu...

she got a 2007 Toyota Corrolla.


52 posted on 01/07/2007 9:27:21 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
There already is a superior Focus, in the European market.

You get the feeling the Ford managers don't read any automotive magazines.
Because those mags (and anybody with an IQ over room temp, including
myself) has been telling them:
"Just build the cars you make in Europe, Australia and Japan here
and sell them here, ya morons!"
53 posted on 01/07/2007 9:30:03 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VOA

That is so true... Ford Europe is so much better... I think the Irony is that most of the Ford built around the world are actually designed here in the states... Correct me if I am wrong..


54 posted on 01/07/2007 9:31:37 AM PST by ARA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: zook
And what were they thinking with a $40,000 T-bird?

Let me add my further complaint:
And what were they thinking with a
neutered, metrosexual $40,000 T-bird?

When I heard a new Thunderbird was coming out, I thought
"Great, a retro, stylish pocket-rocket!".

What a freakin' disappointment Ford delivered!
55 posted on 01/07/2007 9:34:28 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
Blue collar people actually have brains? ;-)

Between the managerial midgets at one end and the fat guys on the assembly line, you have one sh-t company. Alan Mullaly is a smart man, but even he won't be able to put lipstick on this pig.

56 posted on 01/07/2007 9:36:55 AM PST by Clemenza (Put down that coffee! Coffee is for closers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: westmichman
CTS and XLR look pretty good to me especially the turbo models

Yeah, if you have an extra $80-$90,000 to drop on a car (XLR).

57 posted on 01/07/2007 9:37:32 AM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: flada
Ford isn't quite as bad as GM, but they do seem to be in the business of creating one debacle after another. I have an 1997 F150 with a 4.2L. Look up "Ford 4.2L Hydro-locking" on google--there are literally thousands of people with this engine problem. And it's just one of many for Ford How can you say that?
I have a 1990 GMC Sierra with a 5.7L with 210,000 mi. It runs like a top even after being rolled over on it's side about three years ago.
I've owned Toyota and Nissan trucks and neither could hold up to a days work like a GM or Ford truck.
58 posted on 01/07/2007 9:38:17 AM PST by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Meanwhile, across town for GM, the Chevrolet Silverado was selected as Truck of the Year and Saturn Aura was selected as Car of the Year by automotive journalists. Last year Honda took honors in both categories.
59 posted on 01/07/2007 9:39:40 AM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
Every time you buy a Ford, you're subsidizing the UAW.

Everytime you buy a Ford you subsidize the Democratic Party. I think I'll walk.

60 posted on 01/07/2007 9:40:47 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson