Posted on 01/04/2007 6:18:01 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
President George W Bush is to change his military operations chief for Iraq and Afghanistan, US media reports say. Adm William Fallon will replace Gen John Abizaid as head of US Central Command and there will be a new ground commander in Iraq, ABC News reported.
It also said that US ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad is to replace John Bolton as US ambassador to the UN. The reports come days before Mr Bush unveils a new strategy for Iraq that could include thousands more US troops. The Pentagon has declined to comment on the reports. New troops Adm Fallon is the top military commander in the Pacific. If confirmed, the move would put an admiral in charge of two land wars. ABC said Lt Gen David Petraeus was expected to replace Gen George Casey as the leading ground commander in Iraq. In a teleconference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki on Thursday Mr Bush agreed there should be "sufficient" security forces in Baghdad, the White House said.
The BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says there could be perhaps as many as 18,000 extra troops, a policy that is likely to bring gasps of disbelief from many of the president's supporters. The Democrats, newly installed in power in both houses of Congress, will not be supportive, our correspondent says. Mr Bush's new approach is expected to be laid out in a speech as early as the middle of next week. A senior White House official said Mr Bush might make the official announcement on Mr Khalilzad as early as Friday. Mr Khalilzad would have to be confirmed by the Senate, but analysts say he has maintained good relations with the Democrats. Reports say Ryan Crocker, US ambassador to Pakistan, may replace Mr Khalilzad in Baghdad. John Negroponte is set to move from director of national intelligence to deputy secretary of state. Retired vice admiral and intelligence official Michael McConnell is expected to replace Mr Negroponte.
|
Then make John Bolton Iraqi ambassador. That'll speed things up in Baghdad.
"The BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says there could be perhaps as many as 18,000 extra troops, a policy that is likely to bring gasps of disbelief from many of the president's supporters."
Um, only in that I was expecting more like 30,000 to 40,000.
I wont believe it until I hear Bush say it, but by gum Bush is TRYING TO WIN IN IRAQ - after a bad year in Iraq, what a novel concept... "Bush, you Magnificent Bastard, you've outflanked them all!".
Silly rabbits, Bush trix are for suckers. Don't fall for the wild gesticulations happening here. It's all a distraction from the fact that no one has the balls to execute a real war in Iraq, which would also include action against Iran.
If we still had men like this, we would have won and gone home years ago.
Musical chairs so that everybody has to go back to square one?
It doesn't look good.
And Syria. And Saudi Arabia. And Pakistan. And any other dirt hole collection of Jihadis that even look at us funny.
bump!
Even though my neighbors will hate me... this man got results, too.
william-tecumseh-sherman......
Thought that might be a picture of Custer,,,,
Your words are powerful, and true.
Wonder what the body count is that's attributable to the negative MSM and the 'rats and fainthearted pubs who have given hope to the enemy.
Over the long haul, BBC have been more credible than our own press. What's that tell you?
No, Custer was a vain pretty boy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.